Purrely Deck #771314 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 41/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Level-1 Purrely starter opens a Purrely Xyz/Link line into a Rank 7 boss (Expurrely Noir / Expurrely Happiness), which needs a Rank 2 monster with 5+ materials.; Negation-heavy board control: hand traps and Quick Effect negations (Epurrely Beauty, Expurrely Happiness, Effect Veiler) protect the Xyz board.
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Level-1 Purrely or Purrelyly (4 copies, about 43% per hand of 5), use its Special Summon/search text into a Quick-Play Purrely memory, then build a Rank 2 Xyz. Hand traps are held for the opponent's first answer.
• Turn 2 (going second): Use a hand trap (18 copies, about 98% to hold at least one in 6) against the opponent's first summon or search, then follow up with a Quick-Play memory and the Purrely line.
• Recovery: Quick-Play memories and Purrely Xyz attach effects convert GY spells into material, and Purrelyeap! can re-Xyz a Purrely Xyz monster after removal.
• After siding: Not applicable: the deck runs no Side Deck (Side Deck size 0), so there is no post-side plan to evaluate.

Why it scores here

The score is set by the deck as a system, not by its card-level quality or by Purrely's popularity: it reliably gets hand traps into play (about 98% to hold one in a going-second six-card hand) and has strong interaction breadth, but its Level-1 starter access is only about 43% going first (Inferred, 4 copies in 40). Its Xyz routes are structurally awkward: the main deck has no Level-2 monster for the Rank 2 Xyz, and the Rank 7 bosses are reachable only through a Rank 2 monster with 5 or more materials. The deck has no side deck, which caps adaptability, and there is no combo, tournament, or win-rate data, so Meta Power is null and the uncertainty is wide. The deck is also illegal as submitted (three copies of Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring against a limit of two), so the score is capped as a theoretical, structural-only read.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 54.8, Going First ≈ 56, Going Second ≈ 62, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: Illegal copy overage (-10); Level-2 route gap (-2). Final formula: Illegal deck, so no normal Final Contextual score: Structural 54.8 x 0.80 + Tournament Reliability 45 x 0.20 = 52.8, then modifiers -12 (illegal copy overage -10, Level-2 route gap -2), capped low as theoretical/structural-only = 41 (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.43 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Hand-trap density (18 copies) gives strong going-second interaction
• Negation and removal breadth across hand traps and Xyz effects
• Compact 40-card main with 3-copy staples
• Purrely archetype core is fully present (exact-name purity 60%)

Weaknesses

• Illegal as submitted: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring runs 3 copies, limit 2
• Level-1 starters are only about 43% to appear going first
• No main-deck Level-2 monster for the seven Rank 2 Xyz
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptability
• Dead-card risk from 18 hand traps in 40 cards

Critical choke points

• Purrely or Purrelyly Level-1 starter access (4 copies)
• Rank 2 Xyz access, which needs Level-2 monsters the main deck does not supply
• Rank 7 bosses, reachable only through a Rank 2 monster with 5+ materials

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring at 3 copies, legal limit 2; Main 40 and Extra 15 counts are within size rules; Hand-trap count is 18 in the main deck; Purrely exact-name purity 60%; Side deck count is 0
• Inferred: P(at least one Level-1 Purrely starter going first) about 0.43; Hand-trap hold rate about 98% going second; Level-2 route gap for the Rank 2 Xyz; Interaction breadth from card text; Pilotability estimate
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit and archetype meta-share (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first, going-second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample Level-2 sources for Rank 2 Xyz were not in the evidence Deck title is null