Ojama Deck #771287 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 20/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Tempo
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 5 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Chip and grind damage through draw and disruption spells; the list has no reliable board-building engine or closing threat.; Piercing damage from Big Bang Shot and Ben Kei equipped with Equip Spells, if a monster ever lands.
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with draw spells and an Equip-based monster line, using Scapegoat or Ojama Trio for board presence where the hand allows.
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Solemn Judgment, Royal Decree or Heavy Storm to answer the opponent's setup, then draw out of it.
• Recovery: Jar of Greed, Upstart Goblin and Sangan to rebuild card flow after a bad exchange.
• After siding: Not evaluable: the export has no side deck, so no post-side plan can be assessed.

Why it scores here

The list has only 8 monsters in 55 main-deck cards, with 34 Spells and 13 Traps, so the deck rarely opens a working board; the Equip Spells (Axe of Despair, Big Bang Shot, Mask of Brutality) mostly need a monster that is absent. Draw and disruption cards (Jar of Greed, Upstart Goblin, Solemn Judgment, Royal Decree, Heavy Storm) give some grind and interaction, which is why the Structural score is not at the floor. The Ojama archetype is barely present (2 exact-name copies, 3.6% exact purity), so archetype popularity earned no points, and no points came from averaging individual card scores. Five cards are over their copy limit or Forbidden in OCG, which makes the list illegal and caps the score at a theoretical, structural-only read.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox. Structural ≈ 23, Going First ≈ 25, Going Second ≈ 20, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 20. Modifiers: illegal_list_cap (-3); banlist_exposure (0). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); Illegal cap applied, theoretical/structural-only

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Broad draw and disruption suite (Jar of Greed, Upstart Goblin, Solemn Judgment, Royal Decree, Heavy Storm)
• Several Equip Spells can make a single monster a piercing threat

Weaknesses

• Only 8 monsters in 55 cards, so most hands are dead or conflicting
• Five copy-limit or Forbidden violations make the list illegal in OCG
• Negligible Ojama archetype core (2 exact-name copies; core Ojama Yellow/Green/Black absent)

Critical choke points

• Any single Spell-dependent line needs one of 8 monsters to be drawn
• Forbidden draw cards cannot be legally played in OCG

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: 55 main cards, 5 copy-limit or Forbidden violations, OCG size range 40-60; Banlist: Giant Trunade, Pot of Greed and Graceful Charity are Forbidden; Solemn Judgment, Heavy Storm and Reinforcement of the Army are Limited; Archetype purity 3.6% (2 exact-name cards)
• Inferred: Starter access and brick rate estimated from monster count and hypergeometric odds; Interaction quality read from card text
• Provisional: Meta power and matchup fit need a dated metagame sample
• Data gaps: no combos supplied; combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent no side deck in export; post-side adaptability unassessable no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN