Purrely Deck #771232 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Purrely Xyz boss monsters (Expurrely Happiness, Super Starslayer TY-PHON, Divine Arsenal AA-ZEUS) built from Purrely Memory Quick-Play Spells and Level 1 Purrely monsters; Hand-trap and negation pressure (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Ghost Belle, Effect Veiler, Infinite Impermanence) to keep the opponent's board from interfering
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with an archetype starter (Purrely, Purrelyly, or a Purrely Memory) that Special Summons a Level 1 Purrely, then convert into an Xyz boss through the Extra Deck Xyz options
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold a hand trap (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Ghost Belle, Effect Veiler) to answer the opponent's first board, then continue the Xyz line from the GY and Extra Deck
• Recovery: Recover through the Purrely searchers (Purrely, Purrelyly, My Friend Purrely) and the excavate effects, plus recursive Xyz material from the GY
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no side deck, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The structural read is about 57 on the Combo profile, but the deck is Illegal (3 copies of Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring against an OCG limit of 2), so per the rubric it gets no normal Final Contextual score and the 35 is a capped figure. The engine is consistent on paper: the Purrely archetype core (29 copies) gives about a 98% chance of at least one core card in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred), and the 18 hand traps plus 16 negation-text cards give strong interaction density (Inferred from card text). Conversion and median output are not measured because no recorded boards exist, so the ceiling and floor are text-only inferences. The deck has no side deck and no tournament or meta context, so post-side adaptability and matchup fit are low or provisional. Popularity and archetype usage were not used to raise the score, and card scores were not averaged into it.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo primary, Midrange secondary (approximately 80/20 by weight, conceptual only). Structural ≈ 57, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 60, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-6); No side deck (-6). Final formula: Structural 57 and Tournament Reliability 45 give an uncapped 0.80*57 + 0.20*45 = 55 with Meta provisional; the deck is Illegal, so the final score is capped at 35 (theoretical/structural-only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.98 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is heavily represented (29 copies), so the engine is usually reachable on T1-T2 (Inferred)
• Strong hand-trap and negation density to answer the opponent's first board (Inferred from card text)
• Xyz bosses with high ATK and multiple Extra Deck options give closing power (Verified stats)

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring is over the OCG copy limit (Verified)
• No side deck, so no post-side plan and no adaptability (Verified)
• Spell-heavy main (26 Spells, 34 Level-0 cards) with few monster starters, which raises the brick and dead-draw risk (Inferred)
• No recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and floor are unknown (Verified gap)

Critical choke points

• Reliance on a Level 1 Purrely monster or Purrely Memory to start the Xyz engine
• Two-to-three Xyz-only boss copies, so losing Extra Deck materials removes the closing plan

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring 3 copies vs OCG limit 2; Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0, within size rules; Archetype core copies in deck: 29; Extra Deck composition: 14 Xyz, 1 Link
• Observed: Archetype usage: 21 stat rows; core cards present 11/21 (52.4%)
• Inferred: Opening-hand consistency estimates from the hypergeometric table; Hand-trap and negation density scores from card text; Going-second hand-trap coverage
• Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated meta sample); Matchup fit (no tournament context)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry in YGOVN: going-first/second, matchup, brick and OTK rates unknown Meta Power provisional without a dated metagame sample No side deck: post-side plan not evaluable