Magistus Deck #771125 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

40 Main, 15 Extra, incl. Fairy Tail - Luna x3, Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3, Regulus, the Prince of Endymion x3. Created Oct 21, 2026 by YGO Mod.

Deck Magistus OCG

Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)

Created On: 10/21/2026

 
 


Official AI Deck Power Analysis
ComboConfidence: LowEvaluated Oct 22, 2026
25± 8/ 100
Power Score
Structural 49
Reliability 35
Going First 52
Going Second 45

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

Overall score Value
Structural Deck Power 49
Going First 52
Going Second 45
Meta Power provisional
Tournament Reliability 35
  • Primary strategy: Combo
  • Secondary strategies: Midrange
  • Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

  • Win condition: Magistus Fusion/Link boards (Zoroa, the Magistus Verethragna, Aiwass, Magistus Chorozo) built from Spellcaster and Magistus material, with Endymion and Fairy Tail as secondary engines; Endymion Link and Fairy Tail Xyz/Fusion pressure, which depends on Regulus and Fairy Tail Snow being drawn
  • Turn 1 (going first): Opening Magistus/Witchcrafter starters and Verre Magic or Crowley to reach a Link or Fusion board, with Ash Blossom and Droll & Lock Bird held up as interaction
  • Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Mulcharmy Fuwalos) to break the opponent's first board, then Fusion or Link through the surviving engine
  • Recovery: Mulcharmy draw and the GY-activated Fairy Tail effects (Tails of the Fairy Tails, Once Upon a Fairy Tail) to rebuild from the graveyard; no card-level recovery was measured
  • After siding: Not assessable: the deck runs no side deck, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens its archetype core: P(at least one of the 9 core copies in a 5-card opening hand) is about 0.74 and P(at least one searcher-text card) is about 0.95, which earns a moderate D1 (Inferred). Interaction density is real, with 4 hand traps and 13 negation-text cards, so D7 is moderate. Conversion and median output cannot be measured because the export has no recorded boards, so D3 and D4 are text-only inferences. Popularity did not earn points: the archetype core share and the 82% inclusion of Crowley and Mulcharmy were treated only as evidence that the list is real. The score was not built by averaging card scores. It is capped low because the list is illegal: 3 copies each of Ash Blossom and Super Polymerization exceed the OCG Semi-Limited limit of 2, so this is a theoretical, structural-only read.

Dimension scores

# Dimension Score Evidence
D1 Engine Accessibility & Consistency 60 P(at least one of 9 archetype-core copies in a 5-card opening hand) ≈ 0.74; P(at least one searcher-text card) ≈ 0.95 (Inferred)
D2 Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management 50 Copy histogram 11 singles, 1 double, 9 triples; several spell and extra-deck pieces need specific board states, so brick risk is moderate (Inferred)
D3 Combo Conversion & Ceiling 50 No recorded boards (combo data.total combos = 0); ceiling is a text-only read of Fusion/Link/Xyz enablers and Magistus material chains (Inferred)
D4 Combo Floor & Median Output 40 No recorded boards, so median output is unmeasured; estimated lower than the text-only ceiling because the deck mixes three sub-archetypes with 23.6% exact-name purity (Inferred)
D5 Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy 55 4 hand traps plus 13 negation-text cards and GY-activated recursion give multiple independent answers to one interruption (Inferred)
D6 Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind 50 Mulcharmy draw and GY Fairy Tail effects provide some card economy, but no resource profile data exists (Inferred)
D7 End-Board & Interaction Quality 60 average interaction density not available; negation and removal text across hand traps, Verre Magic, Zoroa and Mixousia suggests a layered end-board (Inferred)
D8 Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power 45 No going-second split available; hand traps help the going-second hand, but the Fusion and Link lines are slow without an established board (Inferred)
D9 Offensive Pressure & Closing Power 50 Boss-level end-board cards (Zoroa Verethragna 2900 ATK, Magistus Chorozo 2800 DEF, Aiwass 2800 DEF) provide closing power only if the engine reaches them (Inferred)
D10 Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility 45 21 distinct main-deck cards at 40 cards; exact-name Magistus purity is 23.6% with 42 off-archetype copies, so the list is not compact (Inferred)
D11 Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage 65 13 distinct Extra-Deck cards across Fusion, Link and Xyz with mostly mandatory enablers; flexibility is moderate (Verified struct; Inferred)
D12 Side Deck Adaptability 10 The deck runs 0 side-deck cards, so post-side adaptability is effectively absent (Verified)
D13 Matchup Coverage & Format Fit 40 Tournament context and meta-share are unavailable; no dated metagame sample was supplied (Provisional)
D14 Pilotability & Error Tolerance 40 Multi-engine sequencing across Magistus, Endymion and Fairy Tail with Fusion, Link and Xyz steps demands high decision density (Inferred)

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 49, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 45, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: Illegal copy-limit violation (-12). Final formula: Structural 49 (Combo profile) → Final 0.80*49 + 0.20*35 - 12 (illegal modifier) ≈ 34, then capped to 25 because the legality status is Illegal; theoretical/structural-only, Meta provisional

Probability & combo summary

  • Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.74 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
  • Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
  • Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

  • Archetype-core access is strong for a multi-engine deck: searcher text is present in 17 cards, giving P(at least one searcher-text card in 5 cards) ≈ 0.95
  • Layered interaction: 4 hand traps and 13 negation-text cards cover both the opening turn and the mid-game
  • Extra Deck coverage across Fusion, Link and Xyz gives several boss-level end-boards (Zoroa Verethragna, Aiwass, Magistus Chorozo)

Weaknesses

  • The list is illegal as submitted: 3 copies each of Ash Blossom and Super Polymerization exceed the OCG limit of 2
  • Low exact-name purity (23.6%) with three sub-archetypes weakens engine coherence and raises the chance of dead cards
  • No side deck: the deck has no post-side plan and no adaptability against a known matchup
  • Several key engine cards (Fairy Tail Snow, Instant Fusion, Droll & Lock Bird) are Limited, so only one copy each is allowed and their absence leaves a hole

Critical choke points

  • Super Polymerization and the Extra-Deck Fusion summons: a single successful Fusion Summon chain carries most of the Combo line
  • Ash Blossom and Droll & Lock Bird as the only hand-trap answers to an early board, which means one disruption can end the turn
Priority Remove Add Reason
1 1 copy of Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring and 1 copy of Super Polymerization No replacement required to be legal Brings both cards within OCG Semi-Limited limit of 2; the deck is illegal without this change
2 Off-archetype filler (e.g. 1 copy of Forbidden Droplet) A side deck of 0–15 cards covering the most common opposing engines The deck runs zero side cards, so post-side adaptability is effectively absent (D12 = 10)
3 A low-consistency off-archetype support card A second copy of a core Magistus or Fairy Tail engine card Raises exact-name purity and engine access; purity is 23.6% with 42 off-archetype copies

Evidence & confidence

  • Verified: Main 40 and Extra 15 are within OCG size rules; Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring and Super Polymerization each run 3 copies against a Semi-Limited limit of 2; Droll & Lock Bird, Fairy Tail - Snow, Instant Fusion and Summon Sorceress are each run at 1 copy, matching their Limited limit; The deck has 0 side-deck cards
  • Inferred: Archetype-core opening probability ≈ 0.74 and searcher-text opening probability ≈ 0.95; Hand-trap coverage going second ≈ 0.49 at least one; Engine and interaction quality based on card text; Floor and ceiling estimated from text, not from recorded boards
  • Provisional: Matchup and format fit (D13), since no dated metagame sample exists; Meta Power, left null
  • Data gaps: No recorded combo boards (combo data.total combos = 0): floor, median and ceiling are text-only inferences No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent No win-rate telemetry exists for this deck (going-first/second, matchup, brick and starter rates) Meta Power is provisional because no dated metagame sample was supplied The deck title is null, so the deck is identified by its id and archetype only No guides attached for the archetype (guide data.total guides = 0)

More OCG Info

Magistus

Magistus Breakdown

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
https://metaduelist.com/
Top