Tenpai Dragon Deck #771061 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG
53 Main, 17 Extra, incl. Dark End Evaporation Dragon x3, Dracotail Faimena x3, Dracotail Urgula x3. Created Oct 21, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/21/2026
Main Deck (53)
- Bystial Magnamhut x1
- Dark End Evaporation Dragon x3
- Dracotail Faimena x3
- Dracotail Lukias x2
- Dracotail Mululu x1
- Dracotail Pan x1
- Dracotail Urgula x3
- Fantastical Dragon Phantazmay x3
- Mulcharmy Fuwalos x1
- Mulcharmy Purulia x3
- Nibiru, the Primal Being x1
- Tenpai Dragon Fadra x1
- Tenpai Dragon Genroku x3
- Tenpai Dragon Paidra x3
- Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3
- Ghost Belle & Haunted Mansion x3
- Tenpai Dragon Chundra x1
- Harpie's Feather Duster x1
- Ketu Dracotail x1
- Lightning Storm x2
- Rahu Dracotail x1
- Sangen Kaimen x1
- Sangen Summoning x1
- Super Polymerization x3
- Terraforming x1
- Triple Tactics Thrust x3
- Dracotail Flame x1
- Dracotail Sting x2
Extra Deck (17)
- Blue-Eyes Tyrant Dragon x1
- Dracotail Arthalion x2
- Dracotail Gulamel x1
- Favorite HERO Flame Wingman x1
- Favorite HERO Shining Flare Wingman x1
- Filia Regis x1
- Garura, Wings of Resonant Life x1
- Khaos Starsource Dragon x1
- Millennium-Eyes Restrict x1
- Mudragon of the Swamp x1
- Mysterion the Dragon Crown x1
- Secreterion Dragon x1
- Hieratic Seal of the Heavenly Spheres x1
- Sangenpai Transcendent Dragion x1
- Sangenpai Bident Dragion x1
- Number 38: Hope Harbinger Dragon Titanic Galaxy x1
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 25/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 52 |
| Going First | 52 |
| Going Second | 50 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 40 |
- Primary strategy: Midrange
- Secondary strategies: Toolbox
- Format: ocg
Legality
Main 53 / Extra 17 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Tenpai Dragon / Dracotail fusion and synchro boards (Dracotail Arthalion, Blue-Eyes Tyrant Dragon, Filia Regis, Sangenpai Transcendent Dragion) pressuring through Dragon-based summons; Dracotail Gulamel and Favorite HERO Shining Flare Wingman as extra-deck closers after a Fusion line
- Turn 1 (going first): Open on the Tenpai/Sangen searchers (Paidra, Kaimen, Summoning, Genroku) to reach a Fusion line, using Dracotail recursion from the GY
- Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Belle, Nibiru) to answer the opening, then re-establish a Dragon board through Super Polymerization or Ketu/Rahu Dracotail
- Recovery: Dracotail Faimena, Urgula and Lukias return bottomed cards and GY Dracotails back to hand; Mulcharmy draws help refill when the hand is empty
- After siding: No side deck is registered, so no post-side plan can be assessed
Why it scores here
The deck's engine is reasonably accessible: the archetype core group gives about 87% odds of at least one core card in a 5-card opening hand, and the Tenpai/Sangen searchers provide redundant entry points. Its interaction suite (seven hand traps, Harpie's Feather Duster, Lightning Storm, Dracotail Sting and Flame) gives it a credible answer density, and its Extra Deck contains several high-ATK closers. Those strengths are offset by the lack of any recorded boards, so the median output and ceiling cannot be measured, and by a fragile Fusion-chain pilot burden. The deck is Illegal in OCG: two cards are over their Semi-Limited copy limit and the Extra Deck is over 15, so the score is capped at 25 and is theoretical/structural only. The structural read (about 52) comes from consistency, interaction and closing power on the system, not from averaging card scores, and archetype popularity earned no points.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 62 | Archetype core group P(≥1 in hand of 5) ≈ 0.87 with redundant Tenpai/Sangen searchers (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 55 | 28 distinct main cards with 14 singletons and 13 Fusion monsters; moderate brick risk from Fusion-only hands (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 55 | No parseable boards; ceiling inferred from text only (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 40 | No recorded boards; median output cannot be measured and is held low (Provisional) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 58 | Seven hand traps and Dracotail GY recursion give some route redundancy (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 55 | Mulcharmy draws and Dracotail GY recursion help refill, but Fusion spend is high (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 60 | Harpie's, Lightning Storm, Dracotail Sting/Flame and Mululu give layered interaction (Inferred) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 55 | Hand traps and Super Polymerization offer going-second answers; no board-breaking data (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 62 | Blue-Eyes Tyrant 3400 ATK and Arthalion 3000 ATK give high closing power (Verified card text) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 45 | 53 main cards with 11 triple copies and two over-limit cards reduce efficiency (Verified) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 40 | Extra Deck 17 exceeds the OCG limit of 15; 13 Fusion monsters need a Fusion line (Verified) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 15 | No side deck registered; post-side adaptability cannot be assessed (Provisional) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 45 | Archetype usage shows a 68.8% core present rate; no tournament or meta data (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 40 | Multi-step Fusion and Dracotail chains with many decision points; hard to pilot (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Midrange primary, Toolbox secondary (approx 80/20). Structural ≈ 52, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Illegal legality cap (-25); Banlist exposure (-3). Final formula: Theoretical 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability = 49.6 (Meta provisional), then capped to 25 because the deck is Illegal (copy-limit and Extra Deck size violations)
Probability & combo summary
- Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.87 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
- Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
- Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines
Strengths
- Archetype core is accessible (about 87% at least one core card in hand of 5)
- Layered interaction: seven hand traps plus Harpie's Feather Duster, Lightning Storm and Dracotail Sting/Flame
- High closing power from Blue-Eyes Tyrant Dragon, Dracotail Arthalion and Filia Regis
Weaknesses
- Illegal in OCG: copy-limit violations on Ash Blossom and Super Polymerization
- Extra Deck of 17 is over the 15-card limit
- No recorded boards, so consistency and conversion are unmeasured
- No side deck, so no post-side plan
Critical choke points
- Fusion line depends on Dracotail and Tenpai monsters being in hand
- Super Polymerization is the main Fusion enabler and is over its copy limit
Recommended changes
| Priority | Remove | Add | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | One copy of Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring and one copy of Super Polymerization | Legal-copy replacements (e.g., one Dracotail or Tenpai monster, or a non-Semi-Limited staple) | Restores legality so the deck can receive a normal Final Contextual score |
| 2 | Two Extra Deck cards (e.g., Mysterion or Secreterion Dragon) | Nothing; keep the Extra Deck at 15 | Brings the Extra Deck within the OCG size rule |
| 3 | Nothing | A 15-card side deck | Enables a post-side plan; D12 is currently 15 because no side is registered |
Evidence & confidence
- Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom and Super Polymerization exceed legal copies of 2; Extra Deck count of 17 exceeds the OCG limit of 15; Main Deck 53 is within 40–60; Archetype core group P(≥1 in hand of 5) ≈ 0.87
- Observed: Usage: 68.8% of the archetype's core cards are present in the list
- Inferred: Consistency and hand-trap odds estimated from hypergeometric draws and card text; Interaction density and closing power read from card text
- Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format-fit scores
- Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry; going-first and going-second splits are inferred No side deck registered Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample
Couldn't load the combos
