Tri-Brigade Deck #770745 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, FTK/Alternate-Win
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 51 / Extra 19 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon Level 8 boss monsters (Albion the Sanctifire Dragon, The Dragon that Devours the Dogma, Lubellion) through Fallen of Albaz as a Fusion material, per the card text read; Ecclesia/Despia Synchro and Fusion pressure via Blazing Cartesia, Guiding Quem and Dogmatika Fleurdelis
• Turn 1 (going first): Open Fallen of Albaz or a searcher (Nadir Servant, Aluber, Branded Opening) and convert it into a Level 8 Fusion Monster; Fallen of Albaz is live in about 27% of 5-card openings (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre and Ghost Belle for disruption on the 6-card hand, then convert through Fusion Deployment or Branded Fusion (Inferred)
• Recovery: Re-search Fallen of Albaz or a Branded Spell/Trap from the Deck through Aluber, Despian Tragedy and Mirrorjade-style recursion; the deck has 18 searcher-text cards (Inferred)
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no side deck (Side Deck size 0)

Why it scores here

This list is Illegal: the Extra Deck holds 19 cards against an OCG limit of 15, and three Semi-Limited cards (Ash Blossom, The Fallen & The Virtuous, Super Polymerization) are run at 3 copies against a limit of 2. The structural read is theoretical only. Fallen of Albaz is the central engine piece, with 18 searcher-text cards giving high Inferred access to a starter, and the boss Fusion Monsters and Ecclesia/Despia Synchros give real closing power. Consistency is held back by 24 singleton slots, 8 hand traps and several Level 0 spells that can brick. There is no side deck and no combo or tournament data, so no floor or median output can be claimed. The archetype label says Tri-Brigade, but only one exact Tri-Brigade card is run (about 1.4% exact-name purity). The score was not built by averaging card scores or by popularity; the Illegal legality status caps the final score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 52, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 52, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: Copy-limit and Extra Deck size violations (-10). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers = 0.80*52 + 0.20*45 - 10 ≈ 41; Illegal cap applied, final score 30 (theoretical/structural-only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.27 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Fallen of Albaz engine supports multiple searchers and Fusion lines
• Dense hand traps and removal-text cards give layered interaction
• Level 8 Fusion bosses at 3000 ATK provide closing power

Weaknesses

• Illegal: Extra Deck 19 over the 15 limit
• Illegal: three Semi-Limited cards run at 3 copies
• No side deck
• Archetype label (Tri-Brigade) does not match the list (1.4% exact-name purity)
• Many singleton slots and Level 0 spells raise brick risk

Critical choke points

• Fallen of Albaz is the single engine starter (3 copies)
• Extra Deck size must be cut to 15 before any line is playable

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 51 within 40–60; Extra 19 exceeds 15 (size violation); Ash Blossom, The Fallen & The Virtuous, Super Polymerization each at 3 copies over Semi-Limited limit of 2; Side deck is empty (Side Deck size 0); Card stats and card text as listed in evidence
• Inferred: Fallen of Albaz starter probability ≈ 0.27 (hypergeometric, 5-card hand); Searcher redundancy ≈ 0.90 for at least one searcher; Interaction layering from hand-trap and removal text
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated meta sample); Matchup fit (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: Deck is Illegal; no legal list was supplied to evaluate No combos supplied; combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates) No side deck, so post-side performance cannot be assessed Deck title is null