Snake-Eyes Deck #770732 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 52 / Extra 18 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Synchro and Fusion boards from the White Forest / Diabell engine (Diabell Queen, Chaos Angel, Arms of Genex Return Zero, Snake-Eyes Doomed Dragon), with Diabellze and Curse of Diabell clearing the field; Diabellstar Vengeance recursion and Toy board-presence, with the Winged Dragon of Ra as a late-game tribute payoff
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a searcher (Elzette, Silvy, Toy Soldier, Filia Diabell) and convert into a White Forest Synchro with Woes or Tales, holding Ash Blossom and Nibiru for disruption
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the six-card hand's hand traps (Ash Blossom, Forbidden Droplet, Nibiru) to interrupt the opposing board, then rebuild through the Synchro recursion of Rucia, Astellar and Poplar
• Recovery: Recover from the Graveyard via Synchro-material recursion (Rucia, Astellar, Poplar) and Filia Diabell banish-to-buff, with Mulcharmy draws for hand refill
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no Side Deck, so no post-side plan is recorded

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens a searcher in most hands (P(at least one searcher-text card in a 5-card hand) is about 0.81, Inferred), which carries D1 and D6. Its interaction suite (three-copy Ash Blossom, Forbidden Droplet and Nibiru, plus Typhoon, Toy Box, Curse of Diabell and Solemn Judgment) gives it a layered end-board and a real going-second hand-trap plan, which lifts D7 and D8. Combo conversion and median output are not measured because the export has no recorded boards, so D3 and D4 rest on card-text reads (Inferred). The score comes from the system: searcher density, Synchro recursion and layered interaction, not from averaging card scores and not from Snake-Eyes popularity, which is absent here (only 2 of 9 core cards present). The list is Illegal (two copy-limit violations and an oversized Extra Deck), so the final score is capped at 30 and the result is structural and theoretical only.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary; Toolbox used as a secondary check only. Structural ≈ 55, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-6); extra_deck_overflow (-4); illegal_cap (-13). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural(55) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(45) = 53; modifiers -10 gives 43; Illegal legality caps the final score at 30 (theoretical/structural-only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.81 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher package (14 searcher-text cards) gives reliable starter access
• Layered interaction: three-copy hand traps plus Typhoon, Toy Box, Curse of Diabell and Solemn Judgment
• Synchro-material recursion from the GY gives multiple recovery lines

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: two copy-limit violations and an oversized Extra Deck
• Weak Snake-Eyes core identity: only 2 of 9 usage-core cards present, 0% exact-name purity
• No Side Deck, so post-side adaptability is unknown
• No recorded combos, so ceiling and median are text-only inference

Critical choke points

• Single Snake-Eyes Doomed Dragon Fusion line in the Extra Deck (2 copies) for the Snake-Eyes identity
• Synchro lines depend on Tuner availability; many Tuners are singletons

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom 3 copies vs 2 legal; Diabell Queen 4 copies vs 3 legal; Extra Deck 18 vs max 15; Main Deck 52 cards within the 40-60 range; 0 Side Deck cards; Searcher-text count 14; hand-trap group 6 copies; Usage core: 2 of 9 core cards present (22.2%)
• Inferred: P(at least one searcher in 5-card hand) ≈ 0.81 drives D1; Going-second hand-trap probability ≈ 0.54 drives D8; Interaction layering from card text drives D7; Recovery through Synchro-material recursion drives D5 and D6
• Provisional: Meta Power is null; no dated metagame sample; Matchup and format fit (D13) rest on no tournament data; Post-side plan (D12) cannot be assessed without a Side Deck
• Data gaps: No recorded combos: combo ceiling, median and floor are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry (going first/second, matchup, brick and starter rates) Deck title is null; the evaluation uses the Snake-Eyes archetype label No Side Deck recorded