Rokket Deck #770651 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 41/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Combo
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion or Synchro/Xyz/Link boss (Dragonmaid Sheou, Chaos Angel, Lubellion, Filia Regis) backed by Dragon-heavy board presence; Bystial beatdown via Bystial Lubellion, Druiswurm, Baldrake and Saronir special summons from hand or GY
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a starter (Chamber Dragonmaid, Magnarokket Dragon or Bystial Lubellion), search a second Dragon, and extend into a 2500+ ATK boss; the plan is not reliably live on turn 1 (about 34% per 3-copy starter in a 5-card hand)
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the six-card hand for hand traps (Ash Blossom x2, Droll and Lock Bird x2, Maxx C, Nibiru) to stop the opponent's first summon, then rebuild through the Dragon search chain
• Recovery: Dragonmaid Hospitality, Dragonmaid Changeover and Chaos Space recover from the GY; Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon and Bystial revival effects re-field boss monsters
• After siding: No side deck is run (Side Deck size 0); there is no post-side plan. This is a gap, not a neutral reading.

Why it scores here

The list has no single coherent engine: exact-name Rokket purity is 9.3% (5 of 54 archetype-named copies), and the archetype spread runs across Dragonmaid, Bystial, Mulcharmy, Red-Eyes, Branded, Chaos, Hieratic and Albaz. Consistency is adequate at the searcher layer (P of at least one searcher in a 5-card hand is about 0.82, Inferred) but weak at the starter layer (about 0.34 for each 3-copy starter in hand). Interaction is the deck's real strength: six hand traps, two Droll and Lock Birds, Harpie's Feather Duster and Dragonmaid Tidying give it breadth, and the going-second split favours it. The closing power comes from several 2500-3500 ATK bosses, which lifts D9, but that score reflects the bosses, not an average of card scores. The deck lacks a side deck, has no recorded combos, and has a usage-stat core that does not match this list, so most of the structural read rests on inference; popularity and archetype share earned no points.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 48, Going First ≈ 46, Going Second ≈ 54, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 41. Modifiers: engine conflicts (-4); fusion_enabler_thinness (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers = 0.80*48 + 0.20*41 - 6 ≈ 41

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense hand-trap suite (Ash Blossom x2, Droll and Lock Bird x2, Maxx C, Nibiru) for going second
• Multiple 2500+ ATK bosses across Main and Extra Deck
• 11 searcher-text cards give a high chance of at least one search per opening hand
• Legal under the Master Duel ban list with no violations

Weaknesses

• No single engine: 9.3% exact-archetype purity across 15 named sub-archetypes
• Starter density is low: each 3-copy starter is in an opening 5-card hand only about 34% of the time
• Fusion enablers (about 3) are too few for 9 Fusion Monsters
• No side deck, so no post-side plan
• Heavy reliance on Dragon-race cards with no recorded combo or win-rate data

Critical choke points

• Single Fallen of Albaz gates three Albaz fusions (Mirrorjade, Lubellion Searing, Albion)
• Bystial Lubellion needs a DARK Dragon tribute from the field or hand to Special Summon
• Fusion enablers (Changeover, Super Polymerization, Fallen of Albaz) are the only route to most Fusion Monsters

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal under Master Duel ban list; no size or copy violations (legality); Exact-name archetype purity is 9.3% (composition); 9 Fusion, 1 Synchro, 2 Link and 2 Xyz Extra Deck cards (composition); Usage-statistics core is 3 of 25 present; the stat set does not match this list (usage statistics)
• Inferred: Starter and searcher hypergeometric estimates (probabilities); Going-second hand-trap value from card text; Engine conflicts and fusion-enabler thinness from composition and card text; All dimension scores D1–D11, D14 are structural reads without recorded boards
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and D13 matchup/format fit: no dated metagame sample or archetype share exists
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent usage statistics lists a Dracotail/Borreload core (25 cards, 3 present) that does not match this Rokket list; the stats may be mis-keyed to the archetype and were down-weighted No side deck is recorded (side 0), so D12 is scored from absence No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN: going-first/second split, matchup and brick rate are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied