Destiny HERO Deck #770524 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Fusion
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 5 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Summon Destiny HERO boss monsters (Destro-Dogma, Dusktopia, Dominance, Dystopia) from the Extra Deck and attack for lethal pressure; Link and Masked/Elemental HERO fusions for board presence and disruption
• Turn 1 (going first): Open on a Destiny HERO searcher or Polymerization/Fusion Destiny line, then fuse a boss monster with the Extra Deck Dreadnought Master or Cross Crusader route; hold Ash Blossom and Solemn for the first interaction
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the hand traps (Ash Blossom, Droll, Skull Meister, Ghost Ogre) to slow the opponent's first engine, then rebuild through Destiny HERO searchers and Dark City recursion
• Recovery: Recover through Destiny HERO monsters banished or in the GY (Malicious, Dark Angel, Dreadmaster) and Dark City at Midnight to re-add a monster
• After siding: No side deck is registered, so there is no post-side plan; the deck cannot adapt between games

Why it scores here

This list is Illegal: five cards exceed their copy limits (Called by the Grave and Albion the Branded Dragon are Forbidden, and Ash Blossom, Dominus Impulse and Droll & Lock Bird are over their Semi-Limited or Limited caps), so it receives only a structural read capped at 30. The structural score comes from the Destiny HERO core: a roughly 69% chance of opening at least one archetype core card in a 5-card hand and about 83% for at least one searcher, which supports the engine's consistency. Interaction is dense (Ash Blossom, Droll, Skull Meister, Solemn Judgment and Solemn Warning), and the Extra Deck carries high-ATK closers, which earn the closing-power score. The score is not an average of card scores, and archetype popularity did not earn any points because no tournament or win-rate data exists. The deck has no side deck, no combo records and no meta sample, so the side, matchup and median dimensions remain low-confidence.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 56, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-8); no_side_deck (-4). Final formula: Illegal cap: 0.80*Structural(56) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(45) + ContextModifiers(-12) = ~42 before the cap; capped at 30 because the list is Illegal (theoretical/structural only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.69 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher count (16) gives a high chance of finding an engine piece
• 11 hand traps and multiple negation effects provide real interaction on the opponent's turn
• Extra Deck bosses at 2700 to 3400 ATK give strong closing power

Weaknesses

• The list is illegal under the copy limits and cannot be played as built
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptability
• Low exact archetype purity (28.6%) with many generic and off-archetype slots

Critical choke points

• Forbidden cards (Albion, Called by the Grave) remove two lines from the list entirely
• Fusion lines depend on the Extra Deck staying intact after the first interruption

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Illegal with five copy-limit violations and Forbidden cards present; Main 55, Extra 15, Side 0; sizes are legal under TCG rules; Archetype purity 28.6% exact name, 22 generic slots (composition); Extra Deck: 12 Fusion + 3 Link, all with stat and text data
• Inferred: Opening-hand estimates from the hypergeometric table (archetype core ~0.69, searcher ~0.83, hand traps ~0.76 going second); Structural dimension scores and the Combo weight profile; Interaction density and closing power read from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format-fit dimension (no tournament data)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchup or brick/starter rates Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample No side deck registered, so post-side performance cannot be assessed