Horus Deck #770398 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Links

30 Main, 9 Extra, incl. D.D. Crow x3, Imsety, Glory of Horus x3, Lava Golem x3 - Skill: Precious Cards of the Dark. Created Oct 21, 2026 by YGO Mod.

Deck Horus Duel Links

Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)

Created On: 10/21/2026

Precious Cards of the Dark
 
 


Official AI Deck Power Analysis
ComboConfidence: MediumEvaluated Oct 21, 2026
53± 8/ 100
Power Score
Structural 57
Reliability 55
Going First 60
Going Second 57

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 53/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

Overall score Value
Structural Deck Power 57
Going First 60
Going Second 57
Meta Power provisional
Tournament Reliability 55
  • Primary strategy: Combo
  • Secondary strategies: Midrange, GY-revival engine
  • Format: duel-links

Legality

Main 30 / Extra 9 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

  • Win condition: Sarcophagus-enabled GY revival of Horus monsters (Imsety, Duamutef, Hapi, Qebehsenuef, Horus the Black Flame Deity) into a 3000-ATK board, plus Extra Deck XYZ/Link follow-up.; Extra Deck XYZ and Link threats (Number 90, Number 38, Number 68, TY-PHON, Dingirsu, Underworld Goddess) once material is in place.
  • Turn 1 (going first): Open with King's Sarcophagus or Walls of the Imperial Tomb, search a Horus monster, and use Mulcharmy Fuwalos and Imsety to draw and convert GY resources into a Horus board.
  • Turn 2 (going second): Use D.D. Crow to banish a key GY card and Canopic Protector in response to the opponent's first activation to Special Summon a Horus monster, then rebuild through the Sarcophagus GY revival.
  • Recovery: Rebuild from the GY: Sarcophagus revives Imsety, Duamutef, Hapi or Qebehsenuef once per turn each, and Walls can re-search a Horus monster.
  • After siding: Not applicable: side deck is 0 in this format, so no post-side plan is available.

Why it scores here

The score comes from the system: six Sarcophagus-named enablers (3 King's Sarcophagus and 3 Walls of the Imperial Tomb) give about a 70% chance of at least one in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred hypergeometric), and the Horus GY-revival loop gives a real ceiling of 3000-ATK boards. Interaction is layered across D.D. Crow, Canopic Protector, Powersink Stone and the Extra Deck negations (Number 90, Number 38), which supports the resilience and end-board scores. Floor and median output cannot be measured because the deck has no recorded boards, so D4 is held near the middle and carries a wide band. Penalties come from the single-gate dependence on Sarcophagus, Lava Golem's need for opponent-controlled monsters, and Number 90's dependence on Photon material. The score does not reflect Horus being a popular archetype, and it is not an average of the card scores. No meta sample exists, so Meta Power is provisional.

Dimension scores

# Dimension Score Evidence
D1 Engine Accessibility & Consistency 62 P(at least one of 6 Sarcophagus-named enablers in 5-card hand) ≈ 0.70; 3-copy single-card P ≈ 0.43 (Inferred)
D2 Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management 50 Lava Golem needs opponent monsters, Powersink and Canopic are situational, and 30 cards with 13 distinct (Inferred)
D3 Combo Conversion & Ceiling 60 No recorded boards; ceiling inferred from Sarcophagus GY revival plus 3000-ATK Horus monsters (Inferred)
D4 Combo Floor & Median Output 45 No combos supplied, so floor and median are unmeasured and held near neutral (Provisional)
D5 Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy 58 Canopic Protector GY and field recursion, D.D. Crow, Sarcophagus protection; two lines via Walls and Sarcophagus (Inferred)
D6 Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind 62 Sarcophagus sends 4 GY uses per turn, Walls searches, Mulcharmy and Imsety draw; resource regeneration from GY (Inferred)
D7 End-Board & Interaction Quality 64 Three hand traps, Powersink Stone, two negation effects in the Extra Deck, and removal text (Inferred semantic read)
D8 Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power 55 Three D.D. Crow and Canopic Protector answer going-second boards; no going-second data (Inferred)
D9 Offensive Pressure & Closing Power 62 Multiple 3000-ATK monsters (Horus the Black Flame Deity, Imsety, Lava Golem, Coach King-style XYZ) and Extra XYZ threats (Verified stats, Inferred closing)
D10 Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility 55 30 main cards, 13 distinct, 3 copies of 8 cards, exact-name Horus purity 17.9% with 22 generic cards (Verified composition)
D11 Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage 52 9/9 Extra slots used, 6 XYZ and 3 Link, with Number 90 needing Photon material (Verified composition, Inferred access)
D12 Side Deck Adaptability 50 Duel Links side deck is 0 in this format, so the dimension is neutral with no post-side data (Provisional)
D13 Matchup Coverage & Format Fit 50 Archetype share and tournament link absent, so format fit is unmeasured (Provisional)
D14 Pilotability & Error Tolerance 48 Multi-step GY revivals with once-per-turn gates and Sarcophagus dependency; moderate-to-high decision load (Inferred)

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 57, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 57, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 55. Modifiers: Sarcophagus single-gate dependence (-2); Lava Golem opponent-monster dependence (-1); Number 90 Photon material dependence (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional): 0.80*57 + 0.20*55 - 4 ≈ 53

Probability & combo summary

  • Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.7 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
  • Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
  • Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

  • Six Sarcophagus-named enablers give a high chance of a T1 engine
  • Layered interaction: 3 D.D. Crow, 3 Canopic Protector, 3 Powersink Stone and Extra Deck negations
  • Multiple 3000-ATK closers and a GY revival loop that refills the board
  • Legal list with no copy-limit or size violations

Weaknesses

  • No recorded boards, so the combo floor and median cannot be measured
  • Lava Golem and Powersink Stone are situational in hand
  • Exact-name Horus purity is 17.9%, so the engine relies on generic cards and Sarcophagus gating
  • Single gate: one Sarcophagus-named card carries most of the GY loop

Critical choke points

  • King's Sarcophagus or Walls of the Imperial Tomb on the field for every GY revival line
  • Photon material needed for Number 90 protection
  • Opponent-controlled monsters needed to Special Summon Lava Golem
Priority Remove Add Reason
1 1 Lava Golem 1 extra Sarcophagus-enabler or a non-conditional draw/search card Lava Golem is conditional on opponent monsters; a dead card lowers consistency
2 1 Powersink Stone 1 generic on-field interaction card that works without a counter build-up Powersink needs 2 monster effects to activate, which is slow in combo lines

Evidence & confidence

  • Verified: Legal status: Coach King Giantrainer 1/1 (Limited) and Photon Jumper 2/2 (Semi-Limited) under BanDuelLink; Main 30 and Extra 9 within size rules, Side 0 (Duel Links has no side deck); Composition: 13 distinct main, copy histogram 3x8 / 2x1 / 1x4, Extra breakdown 6 XYZ and 3 Link; Usage stat: Horus archetype present with 21 stat rows
  • Inferred: At least one Sarcophagus-named enabler in 5 cards ≈ 0.70; Interaction density is layered: 3 hand traps, removal and negation text; Engine ceiling from GY revival of 3000-ATK Horus monsters
  • Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated meta sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament link); Going-second board-breaking (no going-second data)
  • Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first, going-second, matchup and brick/starter rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Usage flag inconsistency: usage_statistics marks Extra Deck cards as in_this_deck=false (Number 90, Number 68, Underworld Goddess, Coach King, S:P Little Knight, Super Starslayer TY-PHON, Dingirsu) even though they appear in cards[] with zone extra. core_present_pct 47.4% likely undercounts; by card_id overlap, 16 of 19 core cards are present. This was not recomputed and needs a preprocessor check Guide 1490 has no usable sections (snippet is only  )

More Duel Links Info

Horus

Horus Breakdown

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
https://metaduelist.com/
Top