Mermail Deck #770258 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG
40 Main, 15 Extra, incl. First Penguin x3, Mulcharmy Purulia x3, Siren Vortex of Atlantis x3. Created Oct 20, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/20/2026
Main Deck (40)
- Atlantean Dragoons x2
- Coralianectes, the Luminous Cradle Dragon x1
- Droll & Lock Bird x1
- Electric Jellyfish x1
- First Penguin x3
- Levia-Dragon of Atlantis - Daedalus x1
- Maxx "C" x1
- Monster Arms of Atlantis x1
- Mulcharmy Purulia x3
- Neptabyss, the Atlantean Prince x2
- Poseidra, the Storming Atlantean x1
- Siren Vortex of Atlantis x3
- Warchief of Atlantis x3
- Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x2
- Advent of Atlantis x2
- Atlantis, City of the Sea Dragon x1
- Call of Atlantis x1
- Fish Sonar x3
- Instant Fusion x1
- One for One x1
- Ultimate Sky x1
- Dominus Impulse x2
- Infinite Impermanence x2
- Virtue Stream x1
Extra Deck (15)
- Elder Entity Norden x1
- Azure Ocean Dragon Lord - Neo-Daedalus Rage x2
- Levia-Dragoon - Daedalus x2
- Marincess Coral Anemone x1
- Brionac, Dragon of the Ice Barrier x1
- Sea Dragon Lord Gishilnodon x1
- Abysstrite, the Atlantean Spirit x1
- Bahamut Shark x2
- Full Armored Utopic Ray Lancer x1
- LeVirtue Dragon x1
- Number 101: Silent Honor ARK - Soul Asylum x1
- Toadally Awesome x1
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Medium)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 58 |
| Going First | 62 |
| Going Second | 60 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 55 |
- Primary strategy: Midrange
- Secondary strategies: Stun, Combo
- Format: ocg
Legality
Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 1 violation(s).
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Atlantis/Umi board of WATER monsters (Neptabyss, Dragoons, Poseidra, Levia-Dragon) converting into Link and Xyz pressure, with Azure Ocean Dragon Lord - Neo-Daedalus Rage as the closer; Hand-trap and negation-backed disruption (Ash Blossom, Maxx C, Droll & Lock Bird, Dominus Impulse) that buys time for the Atlantis engine
- Turn 1 (going first): T1 Fish Sonar, Advent of Atlantis or Neptabyss to search a second Atlantean/Atlantis piece, then Atlantis, City of the Sea Dragon or Umi to turn on the Level-reduction and Umi effects
- Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Maxx C, Droll & Lock Bird or Dominus Impulse against the opponent's first summon or search, then rebuild with Warchief or Siren Vortex searches
- Recovery: Warchief and Neptabyss recursion from the GY, Atlantean Dragoons GY search, and Monster Arms of Atlantis GY revival of Atlantis-mentioning monsters
- After siding: No Side Deck is registered, so there is no post-side plan; the list cannot adapt between games
Why it scores here
The list is Illegal because it runs two copies of Bahamut Shark, a Forbidden card, so the score is a theoretical, structural-only read and is capped at 30 rather than given a normal Final Contextual score. Structurally the deck reliably opens a searcher (P(at least one searcher in a 5-card opening hand) about 0.95 by the searcher-text group) and has a real Atlantis/Umi engine with a layered hand-trap and negation suite that rates well on end-board interaction (D7 70). Its weak points are the absence of a Side Deck (D12 25), no recorded combos to confirm a median or ceiling (D3 and D4 are inferred from text only), and an Extra Deck that spends two slots on a forbidden card. The deck is labelled Mermail, but none of its cards are Mermail; the score comes from its Atlantis/Umi/Atlantean/Daedalus system and its consistency, not from the archetype's popularity or from averaging card scores.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 68 | P(>=1 searcher in 5-card hand) about 0.95; Atlantis engine starters (Siren Vortex x3, Warchief x3, Neptabyss x2) with 3-copy redundancy (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 60 | Hypergeometric draw odds are reasonable for a 40-card main with 13 singletons, but Extra-Deck-dependent bricks and situational hand traps reduce functional hands (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 55 | No recorded boards; ceiling from card text only, via Atlantis/Umi chains, Link and Xyz summons, and Abysstrite/LeVirtue-style lines that are absent from the list (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 45 | No combo data; median output is unknown and is estimated low because the best payoffs are missing from the list (Inferred) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 62 | Six hand traps and two-copy searchers give multiple independent answers to one interruption (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 60 | GY recursion via Warchief, Neptabyss and Dragoons plus Monster Arms revival gives regeneration (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 70 | Ten negation-text cards and five removal-text cards, including Virtue Stream, Monster Arms and Dominus Impulse (Verified card text, Inferred quality) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 60 | Going-second disruption from Maxx C, Droll & Lock Bird and Dominus Impulse, with limited board-breaking beyond the engine (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 62 | Closers include Azure Ocean Dragon Lord x2 (ATK 2900), Poseidra (ATK 2800) and Levia-Dragon (ATK 2600); Bahamut Shark cannot be counted (Verified stats, Inferred) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 55 | 40 main cards with 24 distinct, a 17-searcher text load, and 55 of 40 main copies outside the exact Mermail name, which dilutes engine coherence (Verified composition) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 50 | Extra Deck of 15 includes 2 copies of Forbidden Bahamut Shark, so those slots are dead in a legal build; other Link and Xyz picks are on-plan (Verified) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 25 | No Side Deck is registered, so there is no post-side adaptability to score (Verified; scored low) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 50 | No tournament link and no dated metagame sample; Mermail archetype share is not applicable to this Atlantis build (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 50 | Multi-step Atlantis and Umi triggers with the Level-reduction and Umi interactions, plus many once-per-turn names, make it a mid-difficulty deck to pilot (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 58, Going First ≈ 62, Going Second ≈ 60, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 55. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-8). Final formula: Uncapped: 0.80*Structural(57.7) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(55) + ContextModifiers(-8) = 49; capped to 30 because the deck is Illegal (theoretical/structural-only)
Probability & combo summary
- Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.95 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
- Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
- Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines
Strengths
- Strong searcher density (17 searcher-text cards) gives reliable early access to the engine
- Layered interaction: 6 hand traps, 10 negation-text cards and 5 removal-text cards
- Extra Deck link and Xyz closers (Azure Ocean Dragon Lord x2, Poseidra, Levia-Dragon) with real ATK
Weaknesses
- Illegal as built: 2 copies of Forbidden Bahamut Shark
- No Side Deck, so no post-side adaptation
- Archetype label Mermail does not match the list; 55 of 40 main copies are outside the Mermail name
Critical choke points
- Atlantis, City of the Sea Dragon x1 is the single field-spell enabler for the Umi/Level-reduction plan
- The Extra Deck's two Forbidden Bahamut Shark slots are dead, so the closer count is effectively 13 Extra cards
Recommended changes
| Priority | Remove | Add | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2x Bahamut Shark (440556) | Two legal Extra Deck options already in the archetype's pool (for example a second Levia-Dragoon - Daedalus or an Atlantis-named Xyz) | Makes the list legal so it can receive a normal Final Contextual score; the Forbidden card is the only violation. |
| 2 | None (main deck is 40/40 legal size) | A 1-5 card Side Deck | A zero-card Side Deck gives no way to answer a known matchup and drops D12 to its floor. |
Evidence & confidence
- Verified: Legality: 2x Bahamut Shark vs 0 legal copies (Forbidden); all other copy counts are within limits; Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 are within OCG size rules; Card text and stats for the listed cards
- Inferred: Consistency estimates from hypergeometric draws (searcher 0.95, hand-trap 0.65); Engine and interaction quality from card text; Structural score and dimension scores
- Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit (D13), no tournament link
- Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied No Side Deck registered Deck title is null and the Mermail archetype label does not match the card list
Couldn't load the combos





