Blue-Eyes Deck #770192 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 59 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Blue-Eyes White Dragon and Blue-Eyes Jet Dragon boards, closed by Blue-Eyes Ultimate Spirit Dragon, Blue-Eyes Tyrant Dragon, Neo Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon and Blue-Eyes Chaos MAX Dragon (Inferred from card text); Blue-Eyes Chaos MAX Dragon via Chaos Form and Destructive Daruma/Burst Stream board wipes (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Opening Sage with Eyes of Blue or Maiden of White, searching the Blue-Eyes White Dragon line and building toward a Blue-Eyes Jet Dragon or Ultimate Fusion board (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler and Infinite Impermanence for the opponent's first starter, then recover through Sage/Maiden GY effects into Blue-Eyes boards (Inferred)
• Recovery: Recycle Blue-Eyes White Dragon and Blue-Eyes monsters from the GY through Sage, Maiden of White, Dragon Spirit of White and The White Stone of Legend (Inferred)
• After siding: Not applicable: the deck has no Side Deck, so no post-side plan exists

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens a Blue-Eyes starter: the core group of 29 archetype cards gives an estimated 97% chance of at least one in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred), and Sage, Maiden and Wishes provide searches and GY recursion. Conversion is credible on paper, with Blue-Eyes White Dragon boards feeding several 3000+ ATK Extra Deck closers, but no recorded boards exist, so the ceiling and median are text-only inference. Interaction is layered across Ash Blossom, Effect Veiler, Infinite Impermanence, Primite Scream/Drillbeam and Destined Rivals (Inferred from text), yet 62% of main-deck copies sit outside the exact Blue-Eyes name, and the Primite, Kaiju and Galaxy sub-engines compete for slots. Legality is the decisive constraint: Called by the Grave is Forbidden and Ash Blossom is over its limit, so the score is capped at theoretical only; no popularity or meta-share points were awarded, and card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 57, Going First ≈ 58, Going Second ≈ 62, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 50. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-8); Engine conflict and purity (-2). Final formula: Structural 57 → 0.80·57 + 0.20·50 = 45.6, then context modifiers −10 → 35.6; capped at 30 because the deck is Illegal (theoretical/structural-only score)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.97 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.03 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense Blue-Eyes core with about 97% opening access (Inferred)
• Several hand traps and negation-text cards in the Main Deck (Inferred from text)
• Full Extra Deck with high-ATK closers (Verified stats)

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: Called by the Grave is Forbidden and Ash Blossom is over its limit (Verified)
• No Side Deck, so no post-side adaptation (Verified)
• Low exact-name purity; sub-engines compete for slots (Verified counts)

Critical choke points

• Blue-Eyes White Dragon: 3 copies are needed for most lines and it is the target of the Sage and White Stone searches (Inferred)
• A single opponent Ash Blossom or Effect Veiler on the starter can stall the first turn (Inferred)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 59 and Extra 15 are legal sizes for OCG; Called by the Grave is Forbidden (1 copy run); Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring is Semi-Limited (3 copies run); Side Deck has 0 cards; Blue-Eyes card stats (ATK and DEF)
• Observed: Core-group inclusion percentages from usage statistics
• Inferred: Opening-hand access probabilities (hypergeometric); Brick and conflict estimate; Combo ceiling from card text; Interaction layering from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power is null (no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit (D13) is a neutral placeholder; Median output (D4) has no recorded boards
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN No Side Deck, so the post-side plan is absent Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied