Odd-Eyes Deck #769980 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 50 / Extra 21 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum-summoned Odd-Eyes and Supreme King Extra Deck monsters (Supreme King Z-ARC, Odd-Eyes Arcray Dragon) attacking for 4000 ATK; Link and Synchro beaters (Odd-Eyes Override Dragon, Draco Berserker of the Tenyi, Underworld Goddess) once the board is established
• Turn 1 (going first): Set Pendulum Zones with Magician/Performapal/Supreme King scales, search with Pendulum Call, Performapal Skullcrobat Joker and Majesty Pegasus, then Pendulum Summon into an Extra Deck boss; hand traps are held for the opponent's first activation
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ghost Ogre, Nibiru, Infinite Impermanence and Droll & Lock Bird to stop the opponent's 5+ monster summon or first Spell, then rebuild through Pendulum searches (Inferred from card text; no recorded boards)
• Recovery: Pendulum Monsters and Searchers in the 26-card searcher group re-fill the hand; Dark Ruler No More and Pot of Desires are the draw/reset backup
• After siding: No Side Deck is registered (side_count 0), so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The deck's Pendulum engine (22 Pendulum Effect Monsters and 26 searcher-text cards) gives a 98% chance of at least one searcher in a 5-card opening hand, so it reliably reaches a Pendulum board. The Extra Deck (Supreme King Z-ARC, Odd-Eyes Arcray Dragon at 4000 ATK) provides a real closing threat once that board is live. Interaction is the strongest part of the list: 9 hand traps and 17 negation-text cards give a 72% chance of at least one hand trap in a going-second 6-card hand. The score is pulled down by the list itself: 2 copies of a Limited card, a 21-card Extra Deck, and only 8.5% exact-name Odd-Eyes purity across Magician, Performapal, Supreme King and Dracoslayer engines. The evaluation is structural only and was not built from averaged card scores; popularity had no effect because no tournament or meta-share data was supplied.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 48.6, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-6); engine conflicts (-3). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers = 0.80*48.6 + 0.20*40 - 9 = 37.9; capped to 30 because the list is Illegal (over copy limit, Extra Deck over size). Structural only.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.28 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.35 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Searcher density: 26 searcher-text cards, P(at least one searcher in a 5-card hand) = 0.98
• Interaction layering: 9 hand traps and 17 negation-text cards, P(at least one hand trap going second) = 0.717
• Closing threats at 4000 ATK: Supreme King Z-ARC and Odd-Eyes Arcray Dragon

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: Droll & Lock Bird over the copy limit and 21 Extra Deck cards against a 15-card maximum
• Low archetype purity (8.5% exact Odd-Eyes); the list mixes four or more engines
• No Side Deck, so no post-side plan
• No recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and median are unmeasured

Critical choke points

• The Pendulum Zone is the single engine bottleneck: Odd-Eyes and Supreme King plays both need a legal scale pair
• The 21-card Extra Deck must be cut to 15 before the list can be played

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Droll & Lock Bird 2 copies against limit 1; Extra Deck 21 > 15; main 50 in [40,60]; Composition: 22 Pendulum monsters, 9 hand traps, exact-name purity 8.5%; Stat values: Supreme King Z-ARC 4000 ATK, Odd-Eyes Arcray Dragon 4000 ATK
• Observed: Usage stats: 5 of 19 archetype core cards present (26.3%)
• Inferred: Starter and searcher hypergeometric estimates (0.276 / 0.98 / 0.65); Going-second hand-trap coverage 0.717; Interaction density and closing read from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and matchup fit: no dated metagame sample or tournament link
• Data gaps: Deck title is null No combos supplied (total_combos 0), so combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot records are absent No win-rate telemetry; going-first/second and matchup signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample No Side Deck (side_count 0)