Dragonmaid Deck #769970 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion and Link boards: Dragonmaid Sheou, House Dragonmaid, Lady's Dragonmaid and Hieratic Seal of the Heavenly Spheres, backed by 2600-3500 ATK bodies that Dragonmaid text can protect and recur; Recurring Dragonmaid on-summon and Battle Phase loops (Chamber, Kitchen, Parlor, Nurse) to keep summoning Level 7+ Dragonmaid bodies
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Chamber, Kitchen or Parlor Dragonmaid, use the on-summon searches or GY sends to find a Dragonmaid Spell/Trap or monster, then convert into a Fusion or Link Summon
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom and Infinite Impermanence to stop the opponent's first board, then rebuild through Dragonmaid Changeover, Monster Reborn and the Level 7+ Dragonmaid recursion loop
• Recovery: Battle Phase return-to-hand effects on Chamber, Kitchen, Parlor and Laundry Dragonmaid to special summon Level 7+ Dragonmaid from hand or GY, plus Dragonmaid Welcome recovery from the GY
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has 0 side cards, so there is no post-side plan in the evidence

Why it scores here

The deck is Illegal in OCG as built: Chamber Dragonmaid is run at 4 copies against a limit of 3, and Striker Dragon at 3 copies against a limit of 1, so it receives the capped theoretical score and no normal Final Contextual score. Its Dragonmaid engine is real: 33 of 55 main and extra cards carry the exact Dragonmaid name, and the on-summon searches and Battle Phase return effects give it a plausible route from a single starter to a Fusion or Link board. Consistency is inferred from the hypergeometric estimates: about 74 percent for at least one core Dragonmaid in the opening five, with the first-turn starter at roughly 43 percent for the 4-copy Chamber. The deck has no combos, no side deck and no tournament data, so the combo floor, median, ceiling and post-side scores are low-confidence reads of the text. Archetype popularity earned no points, the usage data shows only 4 of 25 core cards present, and the card scores were not averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 51, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 48, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 48. Modifiers: copy-limit and banlist exposure (-4); no side deck (-4). Final formula: Illegal cap: uncapped 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + modifiers ≈ 42, capped at 30; theoretical/structural only. Meta provisional.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.74 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense Dragonmaid engine with on-summon searches and Battle Phase recursion
• Layered interaction from Infinite Impermanence, Ash Blossom, Forbidden Droplet and Crossout Designator
• Strong Level 7+ and Fusion bodies such as Sheou at 3500 ATK

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy counts for Chamber Dragonmaid and Striker Dragon
• No side deck
• No recorded boards or win-rate data to confirm the ceiling

Critical choke points

• Chamber Dragonmaid is the single most important starter; at 4 copies it is over limit
• Striker Dragon is the Link-1 bridge for Link Summons and only 1 copy is legal

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal: Chamber Dragonmaid 4 vs 3 legal copies, Striker Dragon 3 vs 1 legal copy; Main 40, Extra 15, Side 0; Extra breakdown 9 Fusion and 6 Link; 33 of 55 main and extra cards carry the exact Dragonmaid name (60 percent purity)
• Observed: No recorded boards exist (0 combos), so no floor, median or ceiling is observed
• Inferred: P(at least one core Dragonmaid in opening 5) ≈ 0.74; Chamber starter live about 43% of opening hands; Going-first and going-second plan read from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament context)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first/second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown No side deck: post-side adaptability cannot be evaluated Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Deck title is null in the export