Floowandereeze Deck #769352 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 60/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Tribute and Normal Summon Winged Beast monsters into Floowandereeze & Empen (2700 ATK) and the Extra Deck boss monsters (Raiza, Mirrorjade, Garura, Mereologic Aggregator); Greed card advantage (Pot of Duality, Pot of Prosperity, Pot of Extravagance) and Extra Deck Link/Xyz beats
• Turn 1 (going first): Open on a Level 1 Floowandereeze monster (Robina, Eglen, Stri or Toccan), Normal Summon it, use the Floowandereeze Spell/Trap to search or set up Winged Beast chains, then extend to Empen or a Level 8 boss
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom, Ghost Belle and Evenly Matched to interrupt the opponent's first board, then rebuild with Floowandereeze Normal Summon chains and Pot draws
• Recovery: Recover through the banished Floowandereeze cards (Toccan's effect and Robina/Eglen banish-on-leave) and the Pot searches, which refill the hand after one interruption
• After siding: Not applicable: the deck registers 0 side cards, so there is no post-side plan. Best-of-3 play repeats the main-deck plan with no adjustment

Why it scores here

The deck scores as a connected Midrange system, not as an average of its cards. The archetype core is very likely to be live: the hypergeometric estimate gives P(>=1 core card in a 5-card opening hand) of about 0.98, and the Floowandereeze line is redundant across three starters at 3 copies each. Interaction is layered across Ash Blossom, Ghost Belle, Evenly Matched, D.D. Crow, Harpie's Feather Duster and Dimensional Fissure, which supports the endboard score. Conversion and median output could not be measured because no parseable boards were supplied, so those scores rest on text reads and are capped. The side deck is empty, which holds Side Deck Adaptability down to 20 and pulls the Final score down. Popularity and archetype usage stats confirm the list is real and accessible, but they did not earn points by themselves.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary, Combo secondary (about 80/20 by judgment; no profile was blended numerically). Structural ≈ 63, Going First ≈ 66, Going Second ≈ 56, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 58. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers = 0.80*62.6 + 0.20*58 - 2 = 59.7, rounded to 60

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.99 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.02 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is very likely to be live in the opening hand
• Layered interaction: 7 hand traps plus negation and floodgate cards
• Greed draw cards and recursion provide card advantage
• Empen and Raiza give high-ATK closing power

Weaknesses

• Zero side deck: no post-side adaptability in best-of-3
• Low exact-name purity (28.6%) with a wide Extra Deck spread
• No recorded boards, so conversion and median output cannot be verified
• Three Limited cards in the Main Deck restrict copy flexibility

Critical choke points

• Every line depends on Winged Beast Normal Summons, so a Winged Beast hand-trap or a Normal Summon lock would stall the opening
• Empen and the Level 8 bosses depend on Tribute Summons that Dimensional Fissure and the Floowandereeze Trap can disrupt

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 55, Extra 15, Side 0 within OCG size rules (40-60, 0-15, 0-15); All six Limited and Semi-Limited cards are run within their legal copy limits; Archetype core 30 copies with 100% inclusion in the usage stats; 17 of 22 core cards present; Exact-name purity 28.6% from the composition export
• Inferred: P(>=1 core card in a 5-card opening hand) ~0.98 from the hypergeometric table; Interaction density is high from text reads of the 7 hand traps and negation cards; Going-first and going-second plans are text-derived
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and matchup fit (D13), since no dated metagame sample exists; Median output (D4) without recorded boards
• Data gaps: no combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN: going-first, going-second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied deck title is null, so the deck is identified by id and archetype only