Kaiju Deck #768676 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±6 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Midrange
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Synchro and Link beatsticks (Sangenpai Dragions, Dis Pater, Zealantis, Promethean Princess) after the Tenpai Dragon and Bystial lines get them onto the field; Bystial Dis Pater and Bystial recursion/removal grinding the opponent's board; Gameciel as a going-second board stopper
• Turn 1 (going first): Open Tenpai Dragon Paidra or Sangen Kaimen, search a Tenpai/Sangen card, and hold hand traps (Ash, Veiler, Droll) to protect the first engine turn
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (14 in the main deck) to strip the opponent's first summon or search, then rebuild through Tenpai Dragon Genroku and Chundra into a Synchro
• Recovery: Recover through Tenpai Dragon Fadra GY revival and Bystial banish-and-summon effects after a hand-trap-only turn
• After siding: Not evaluable: the side deck is empty (0 cards), so no post-side plan exists in the list

Why it scores here

The list is Illegal: Baronne de Fleur is Forbidden in OCG and is run once, so the deck gets only a structural read capped at 30. Its engine is spread across several sub-archetypes (Tenpai Dragon, Sangen, Bystial, Mulcharmy, Rose, Dragion Synchros), with only 2 of 53 archetype-tagged copies being Kaiju, which weakens engine coherence. The deck reliably carries hand traps: 14 hand traps and 15 negation texts give a 94% chance of at least one in a six-card going-second hand (Inferred). Its Synchro and Link beatsticks give offensive reach, but no combo boards are recorded, so conversion and median output are text-only inferences. No side deck, no tournament link and no win-rate data were supplied, so the post-side and format-fit scores stay low and provisional. Popularity and archetype naming contributed nothing, and card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox. Structural ≈ 46, Going First ≈ 45, Going Second ≈ 48, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-10). Final formula: Illegal theoretical cap: 0.80*Structural(46) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(40) = 45, minus 10 banlist modifier = 35, capped at 30 because the deck is Illegal (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense hand-trap and negation suite (14 hand traps, 15 negation texts) gives high chance of interaction on the opponent's first turn
• Multiple independent starters (Paidra, Genroku, Fadra, Sangen Kaimen, Dis Pater via banish) give some route redundancy
• High-ATK Synchro and Link closers (Dis Pater 3500, Sangenpai Dragion 3000, Zealantis 2500)

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: Baronne de Fleur (Forbidden) is run once, so the deck cannot be entered as-is
• Engine incoherence: archetype purity is 3.6% and the deck mixes Tenpai, Sangen, Bystial, Mulcharmy, Rose and Salamangreat without a single engine
• High tech and hand-trap density raises brick risk in hands without an opponent action to respond to
• Empty side deck: no post-side plan and no adaptability

Critical choke points

• Tenpai Dragon Paidra x3 is the only frequent starter; a hand without it or a Sangen search loses the engine
• Going second relies on a hand trap being drawn (94%) with no recorded follow-up in the same hand

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Baronne de Fleur is Forbidden in OCG and run once (illegal); Main 40 and Extra 15 are within size rules; 14 hand traps and 15 negation texts from role tags; Attack and DEF values for listed cards
• Observed: Copy histogram: 10 singletons, 9 doubles, 4 triples in the main deck
• Inferred: P(at least 1 Paidra in 5) = 0.34 and hand-trap P(at least 1 in 6) = 0.94; Engine conversion and recovery from text only, with no recorded boards
• Provisional: Format fit and matchup coverage (no tournament link or dated meta sample); Post-side plan (no side deck)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No side deck (0 cards), so post-side performance cannot be assessed No win-rate telemetry for going-first/second, matchups or brick rates Meta Power is Provisional with no dated metagame sample