Eldlich Deck #768613 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 52/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo, Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Eldlich the Golden Lord and the Golden Land trap-monster engine lead into Fusion/Link/Xyz extra-deck boss pressure (Mad Golden Lord, Fallen Angel of the Golden Land, TY-PHON, Mereologic Aggregator).; Mad Golden Lord's control-steal effect and Elder Entity N'tss's on-field destruction, supported by board-breaking traps and spells (Raigeki, Torrential Tribute, Harpie's Feather Duster, Dogmatika Punishment).
• Turn 1 (going first): Open on Golden Land trap-monsters, Cursed Eldland, Delta of Invitation and Eldlich searchers to reach Eldlich the Golden Lord and an extra-deck boss, while keeping Solemn-family and Infinite Impermanence interaction up.
• Turn 2 (going second): Use a six-card hand to spend hand-traps and negations (Solemn Strike, Solemn Judgment, Solemn Accusation, Infinite Impermanence, Iron Thunder) on the opponent's first summon or activation, then rebuild the engine from the GY and banish zone.
• Recovery: Recover through Golden Lord's GY effect, Eldlixir and Golden Land traps that set cards from the Deck or banish zone after use, and Cursed Eldland's search effect.
• After siding: No side deck is run, so there is no post-side plan. Post-side adaptability is untested and scored as a gap.

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a connected Eldlich system: a Golden Lord and Golden Land trap-monster engine that repeatedly sets and recycles its own cards, backed by a dense interaction suite and a fusion/link extra-deck boss package. Starter access is good (P(at least one Golden Lord in a 5-card opening hand) ≈ 0.34, and six searcher-text cards give P ≈ 0.58), but the 37 level-0 spells and traps and only 18% exact-name archetype purity leave real brick and conflicting-plan risk. Interaction breadth and boss power (Mad Golden Lord 3800 ATK, TY-PHON 2900 ATK) lift the closing and endboard dimensions, while the absence of a side deck and of any recorded boards keeps consistency and matchup fit capped. Popularity and archetype usage were not credited, and no card scores were averaged into this result.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 57, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 56, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 52. Modifiers: no side deck (-3); limited/semi-limited staples in engine slots (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers = 0.80*57 + 0.20*52 - 4 ≈ 52

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense negation and removal suite (Solemn family, Infinite Impermanence, Iron Thunder, Skill Drain, Dogmatika Punishment)
• Strong extra-deck boss package with high ATK and steal/destruction effects
• Recursive Golden Land and Eldlixir trap engine that can refill from the Deck and banish zone

Weaknesses

• No side deck at all (0 slots)
• Low exact-name archetype purity (18.2%) with many off-archetype and situational cards
• Heavy LP costs on core interaction
• Probability and combo evidence are estimates, with no recorded boards

Critical choke points

• Eldlich the Golden Lord (3 copies) is the central starter and Mad Golden Lord and Fallen Angel require it
• Golden Land trap-monsters depend on the Golden Lord being on the field for their extra effects

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal status: 40 Main, 15 Extra, all Limited and Semi-Limited copy counts are within legal_copies; Card text and stats for the listed cards; Archetype purity 18.2% and copy histogram; Side deck count is 0
• Inferred: Starter density and engine accessibility from hypergeometric draw odds; Brick and conflict risk from composition; Interaction quality and board-breaking from card text; Pilotability from sequence complexity
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament link or archetype meta-share)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied, so combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent no win-rate telemetry for going-first/second, matchups or brick rates Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample no side deck, so post-side adaptability has no evidence