Magician Girls Deck #768297 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Dark Magician-family boards (Dark Magician, Dark Magician Girl, The Dark Magicians) and Chaos-line fusion/synchro boss monsters (Master of Chaos, Chaos Angel) backed by Dark Burning Magic style board clears; Mulcharmy draw-and-grind plus Dark Paladin - Wave-Motion and Ekhajar pressure
• Turn 1 (going first): Search with Magician's Rod, Dark Magical Circle or Shining Sarcophagus, set up Dark Magician plus Dark Magician Girl, then extend into a fusion or synchro boss. Protect with Ash Blossom and Infinite Impermanence.
• Turn 2 (going second): Open a 6-card hand with 1 to 2 hand traps (Ash Blossom, Maxx C, Droll and Lock Bird, Nibiru) to break the opponent's first summon, then rebuild through Mulcharmy draws and Magician searches.
• Recovery: Mulcharmy Fuwalos and Purulia draw off summons, and Magician's Rod and Dark Magician Girl recur from the GY. This relies on the deck's searchers keeping the Magician line alive.
• After siding: No side deck is registered (side count 0), so there is no post-side plan. The deck cannot adapt between games.

Why it scores here

The list is illegal: four Forbidden cards are over the copy limit (Magicians' Souls x2, Charmer Quartet in Bloom, Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon, Baronne de Fleur), so it is capped and the score is theoretical and structural only. Scoring treats the deck as one system. The engine has real redundancy, with 14 searcher-text cards, 8 hand traps and 15 negation-text cards, and the boss monsters are strong. However, it splits across several sub-engines (Dark Magician, Mulcharmy, Chaos, Prophecy, Cyber, Fleur), which weakens its opening-hand consistency, and it has no side deck and no recorded boards. Popularity and card-level strength did not add points, and card scores were not averaged.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo profile (primary); Midrange recursion and interaction weight disclosed as a secondary read but not blended into the numbers. Structural ≈ 49.2, Going First ≈ 45, Going Second ≈ 48, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-7); Engine conflicts (-5). Final formula: Unweighted contextual = 0.80*Structural(49.2) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(40) = 47.4; modifiers -12 gives 35.4; Illegal cap (theoretical, structural-only) sets the final score to 30. Meta Power is null (Provisional).

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.78 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Searcher density (14 searcher-text cards) gives repeatable access to the Dark Magician core
• Layered interaction: 8 hand traps, Mind Mirror Force, Dark Burning Magic and Solemn Judgment
• High-ATK end-board options (Chaos Angel 3500, Master of Chaos 3000, Dark Magician 2500)

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: four Forbidden cards over the copy limit
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Low archetype purity: the engine is split across several sub-archetypes
• Several Extra Deck options depend on Forbidden or Limited cards

Critical choke points

• Dark Magician plus Dark Magician Girl must both be on the field for most of the boss routes
• Hand-trap count of 8 means a hand with no hand trap has no early interaction when going second

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Four Forbidden cards over the copy limit (legality check); Main 55 and Extra 15 are inside the OCG size rules; side 0 is allowed; 14 searcher-text cards, 8 hand traps, 15 negation-text cards (role counts); Extra Deck: 6 Fusion, 6 Link, 3 Synchro (composition)
• Inferred: P(at least one searcher in opening 5) ≈ 0.78 (hypergeometric); P(at least one hand trap in going-second 6) ≈ 0.63 (hypergeometric); Archetype core P(open) ≈ 0.32 (hypergeometric); Combo ceiling and floor estimated from card text only (no boards); Interaction layering read from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power and format fit (no dated metagame sample supplied)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link: archetype meta-share and pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry: going-first, going-second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied no side deck registered, so post-side performance is unscored