Solfachord Deck #768052 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Pendulum summon engine
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 43 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum-summoned Solfachord and Power Patron boards that feed Supreme King Z-ARC, Odd-Eyes Absolute Dragon and Nerva the Power Patron of Creation (Inferred from text; no recorded boards); Link and Synchro closers (Mediclius, Junora, Exceed the Pendulum) once the Pendulum zone is live (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Pendulum Summon off two Solfachord Pendulum scales, use Solfachord Happiness to add a second pair, and convert the resulting Extra Deck access into a Link or Synchro board (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Open with Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird or Maxx 'C' to break the opponent's first combo, then rebuild through Medius or Solfegia (Inferred)
• Recovery: Searchers (27 searcher-text cards) and Solfachord Happiness recover a Pendulum pair from the Deck after a hand-trap or board wipe (Inferred)
• After siding: None: the deck runs zero side cards, so there is no post-side plan (Verified from composition)

Why it scores here

This Solfachord list reliably opens a Pendulum pair: the archetype core is present in about 85% of opening 5-card hands and at least one searcher-text card in 99.6% (Inferred from hypergeometric odds). Its conversion ceiling rests on Pendulum-summoned Link and Synchro boards and on Supreme King Z-ARC, but no recorded boards exist, so the median and floor are scored conservatively and marked Inferred. Interaction is broad (four hand traps, roughly 20 negation-text cards, 29 removal-text cards), which lifts the endboard score without any recorded interaction data. The deck is scored as a system, not by averaging card scores, and popularity did not earn points: the archetype usage stats only confirm the core is standard. The score is capped at 30 because Varudras, a Forbidden card, is run in the Extra Deck, which makes the list illegal in OCG. The uncapped structural read is about 55, and the lack of a side deck and of any tournament or meta data keeps confidence Medium.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 55.5, Going First ≈ 58, Going Second ≈ 52, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 50. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-12); illegal_cap (-12). Final formula: 0.80*Structural(55.5) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(50) = 54.4; modifier -12 (banlist exposure, Forbidden card); illegal-deck cap applied to 30 (Meta Provisional)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.85 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Core Pendulum engine is accessible: the core is present in 85% of opening 5-card hands (Inferred)
• Dense interaction package: four hand traps plus negation and removal text across the Main Deck (Inferred)
• High-ATK closers (Z-ARC 4000, Nerva 3300, Junora 3100) and multiple Extra Deck routes (Inferred)

Weaknesses

• Varudras, the Forbidden card, makes the list illegal in OCG as built (Verified)
• Zero side deck: no post-side adaptability (Verified)
• Low exact-name purity (13.8%) suggests a mixed-archetype engine that may conflict (Verified composition, Inferred impact)

Critical choke points

• The Forbidden Varudras slot must be removed before the list can be played in OCG (Verified)
• Pendulum scale pairs: the engine depends on two Solfachord scales being live at once (Inferred)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 43, Extra 15, Side 0 are within the OCG size rules (40-60 Main, 0-15 Extra, 0-15 Side); Varudras is Forbidden in OCG and is run 1 copy, which makes the deck illegal; Copy histogram: 13 singletons, 6 doubles, 6 triples; Exact-name Solfachord purity is 13.8%
• Inferred: Opening-hand access to the core (0.852) and searchers (0.996); Interaction density from card text (about 20 negation, 29 removal); Going-second hand-trap probability 0.465; Midrange profile and weights used for the structural score
• Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit: no dated metagame sample and no tournament link
• Data gaps: no combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry; going-first, going-second and matchup rates are unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Side deck is empty, so post-side performance cannot be assessed