Simorgh Deck #768030 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 38/100 (±12 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Toolbox
• Secondary strategies: Midrange
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Floowandereeze Extra-Deck and Main-Deck beaters (Snowl, Empen, Raiza, Gustav Max) reached through Floowandereeze searches and Normal Summon chains; Off-archetype Xyz and Link beaters (Raidraptor - Ultimate Falcon, Mereologic Aggregator, Knightmare Unicorn) if the Floowandereeze line stalls
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Floowandereeze monster or Map/Adventure, search the next Floowandereeze engine piece, then Normal Summon into Empen or Snowl. Text-only inference; no recorded boards exist.
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ghost Belle, Ghost Ogre, Effect Veiler, Droll and Lock Bird to stop the opponent's first summon or effect, then rebuild through Floowandereeze searches. Inferred from card text.
• Recovery: Floowandereeze monsters banish themselves and return through their search effects, and Pot of Duality or Pot of Extravagance supply extra draws. Inferred from text.
• After siding: Not available: the deck has no side deck, so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The deck scores as a system: the Floowandereeze searchers and Normal Summon chains give a plausible opening engine (P(at least one of a 3-copy engine card in a 5-card opening hand) is about 0.34, and P(at least one searcher-text card) is about 0.97; both Inferred). Eight hand traps and about 29 removal-text cards give it real interaction density, but the 15 tech/Pot/Terraforming slots and 54 off-archetype copies dilute the engine. No recorded boards exist, so the ceiling and median are both text-only inference. Popularity and archetype usage did not earn points: the deck runs only one exact Simorgh card and only 2 of 25 archetype core cards, and the scores were not averaged from individual card scores. The Illegal status (three copies of Pot of Extravagance against a limit of two) and the empty side deck cap the final score well below a normal contextual read.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Toolbox primary; Midrange secondary, disclosed as a structural blend by inspection only. Structural ≈ 51, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 48, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-8); engine conflicts and off-archetype spread (-4). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers(-12); illegal list capped low, theoretical only

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher text (19 cards) gives high P(at least one searcher in hand)
• 8 hand traps and 6 negation-text cards give interaction at both going-first and going-second
• Several 2700-3500 ATK beaters across the Extra and Main Decks

Weaknesses

• Pot of Extravagance is over the OCG copy limit, so the list is illegal as built
• No side deck, so no post-side plan
• 15 tech and Pot-style slots plus 54 off-archetype copies reduce compactness
• No recorded combos or tournament data, so the score rests on text inference

Critical choke points

• Floowandereeze searchers (Robina, Eglen, Map, Adventure) are the only dependable engine starters
• Hand-trap coverage depends on 8 cards, which is thin against a full-brick hand

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 composition; Pot of Extravagance 3 copies vs Semi-Limited limit 2 (over limit); Card text and banlist status for all listed cards; Archetype spread and usage stats (2 of 25 core cards present)
• Inferred: Opening-hand engine probability (0.34 for 3-copy starter; 0.97 searcher-text group); Interaction density from negation and removal text; Going-first and going-second plans from card text; Dimension scores D1-D14
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); D13 matchup and format fit (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN; going-first, going-second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied deck title is null; evaluation relies on the archetype and card list only no side deck, so post-side performance cannot be evaluated