Borrel Deck #767993 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 43/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Tempo
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 54 / Extra 16 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Borrel Link-5 boards (Borrelend Dragon, Borrelshroud Dragon, Borrelsword Dragon) and Rokket recursion that keeps Extra Deck summons flowing; Bystial Dis Pater and Draco Berserker of the Tenyi as Synchro pressure with Bystial Magnamhut and Bystial Druiswurm as Limited recursion pieces
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with Rokket Loader, Rokket Tracer, Quick Launch or Boot Sector Launch to reach Rokket link material, then Link-up into a Borrel boss
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre and Snow Rabbit, Droll and Lock Bird, Infinite Impermanence) to stop the opponent's first real play, then rebuild the board through Rokket searchers
• Recovery: Rokket Recharger, Absorouter Dragon and Rokket Detonator re-summon from the GY and Borrel Regenerator recurs a Rokket from the GY
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no Side Deck, so no post-side plan exists in the evidence

Why it scores here

This is a theoretical, structural-only read: the list is illegal (Ash Blossom at 3 copies against a limit of 2, and 16 Extra Deck cards against a maximum of 15), so the score is capped and does not reflect a normal Final Contextual value. The system reads as a Rokket and Borrel Midrange shell: 21 archetype-core copies give about a 92.5 percent chance of at least one core card in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred), and the Rokket searchers and recursion carry the engine past one disruption. Interaction is dense, with 12 hand traps and 14 negation-text cards, which supports the going-second plan. The score does not come from Borrel being a popular archetype, and it does not come from averaging card scores. No combo boards, tournament data, or side deck exist, so floor, median, and meta are unmeasured, and the Extra Deck overflow and a diffuse archetype spread (Rokket 20, generic 22, exact Borrel 9) lower the confidence further.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 57.2, Going First ≈ 58, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: illegal list (copy limit and Extra Deck size) (-12); no side deck (0). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) = 54.8, then illegal-list modifier -12 = 42.8, rounded to 43; theoretical/structural-only because the deck is Illegal

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.93 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.08 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense Rokket engine with 21 core copies and about 92.5 percent opening-hand access (Inferred)
• Heavy hand-trap and negation density (12 hand traps, 14 negation-text cards) supports going second (Inferred)
• Link-5 Borrel bosses with 3500 ATK and negation text give a high closing ceiling (Verified stats)

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: Ash Blossom over its Semi-Limited limit and 16 Extra Deck cards against a maximum of 15
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation is evidenced
• Diffuse archetype purity (exact Borrel name 12.9 percent), with generic and off-archetype slots diluting the engine

Critical choke points

• Legality: the list cannot be played as-is until the Ash Blossom and Extra Deck overflow are fixed
• The Rokket link material chain: many lines depend on a Rokket monster being in hand or on the field

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom copies 3 vs legal 2; Extra Deck size 16 vs maximum 15; Main Deck size 54 within 40 to 60; Archetype breakdown: exact Borrel purity 12.9 percent; Card stats and banlist status for all 46 distinct cards
• Inferred: Opening-hand starter access of about 0.925 for the core group; Midrange strategy classification and going-second hand-trap plan; Dimension scores D1 to D9 and D11 to D14 (text-based, no boards)
• Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit (D13), with no dated metagame sample; Tournament Reliability, with no tournament link or post-side data
• Data gaps: no combos supplied, so combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent no win-rate telemetry (going-first, going-second, matchup, brick and OTK rates) no Side Deck in the list, so best-of-3 adaptation cannot be scored Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample deck title is null