Supreme King Deck #767641 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 32/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 5 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Boss pressure from K9-X Werewolf (3300 ATK), Odd-Eyes Pendulum Dragon of the Four Heavenly Dragons, and Dark Magician of Destruction (Inferred from card text; no combo data); Link/Xyz pressure from Exceed the Pendulum, Zenna's Deceiving Doll Maidens and K9-66X Jacks (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Pendulum-set and searcher chain (Horoscope Sorcerer, Performapal Skullcrobat Joker, K9-66b Lantern) into a K9 or Magician boss, with Mulcharmy draw as backup (Inferred, text-only)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold hand traps (Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Infinite Impermanence, Maxx C) to answer the opponent's first summon, then extend through Extra Deck links (Inferred)
• Recovery: Recover via searchers (21 searcher-text cards) and Mulcharmy draw effects; GY recursion is limited (Inferred)
• After siding: Not evaluable: side_count is 0, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

This list is Illegal in OCG: it runs four Forbidden cards, and Astrograph Sorcerer is run three times against a limit of one, so under the rubric it gets only a theoretical, structural-only read. The searcher density (21 searcher-text cards, about 92% to hit at least one in a 5-card hand) and the hand-trap suite (9 flagged) give the deck a plausible way to open and to answer the first summon, which is why it earns a mid-range engine and interaction score. Conversion and median output are not measurable here because no combos were supplied, so the ceiling and floor scores are Inferred from card text alone. The deck has no real Supreme King cards (zero exact-name copies; 70 off-archetype copies across K9, Magician, Mulcharmy, Odd-Eyes and others), so the archetype label earned no points and popularity or meta-share did not count. The score comes from the system's consistency, interaction, and boss options on paper, not from an average of card scores, and it has no side deck to recover after a loss.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange profile only; Toolbox noted as secondary and not blended. Structural ≈ 46.5, Going First ≈ 45, Going Second ≈ 50, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-12). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); Illegal list, so theoretical/structural-only with banlist modifier applied

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.92 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• 21 searcher-text cards give high opening access to the engine (Inferred)
• 9 hand traps and 18 negation-text cards give interaction on both turns (Inferred)
• Several 2500+ ATK bosses and Extra-Deck link/Xyz options (Verified stats)

Weaknesses

• Illegal in OCG: four Forbidden cards and Astrograph Sorcerer over copy limit (Verified)
• No real Supreme King cards; 70 off-archetype copies split across several sub-archetypes (Verified)
• No side deck; no post-side plan (Verified)
• Core archetype cards (Z-ARC, Gate Zero, Odd-Eyes Absolute Dragon, Vortex Dragon, Beyond the Pendulum) absent; core present 5/12 (Verified)

Critical choke points

• Astrograph Sorcerer over copy limit; legal list must cut two copies
• Forbidden K9-04 Noroi, Artifact Mjollnir, Charmer Quartet in Bloom and Saryuja Skull Dread must all be removed
• No side deck, so one lost game has no adaptation

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Illegal (4 Forbidden, Astrograph Sorcerer 3/1); 55 Main / 15 Extra / 0 Side; Archetype core present 5/12 (41.7%); Zero exact-name Supreme King copies
• Observed: Interaction card text density (18 negation, 20 removal) from card text scaffold
• Inferred: Opening-hand starter access ~0.92 (searcher group); Brick risk and route redundancy; Going-first/second plans from card text; Interaction quality
• Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated meta sample); Matchup and format fit (D13)
• Data gaps: Illegal list: cannot receive a normal final score No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry; going-first/second and matchup rates unknown Meta Power provisional without a dated metagame sample No side deck; post-side plan unevaluable No deck title (title null)