Magical Musket Deck #767629 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 12 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fiendsmith Extra Deck Fusion/Link pressure (Rextremende, Lacrima, Agnumday) and Magical Musket field-control backed by Mulcharmy draw; Ecclesia and the Dark Dragon Synchro beatdown; Caesar and Albion are present but illegal and cannot be counted on
• Turn 1 (going first): Open Fiendsmith or Musket starter, use Fiendsmith's Tract / Engraver for search, then hold Ash Blossom, Solemn Judgment and Red Reboot as interaction; no combo boards are recorded to confirm this line
• Turn 2 (going second): Use hand traps (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Maxx C, Droll & Lock Bird, Red Reboot) to break the opponent's first summon and then rebuild with Mulcharmy draw
• Recovery: Musket and Mulcharmy monsters recur through Magical Musket searchers and Mulcharmy draw effects; no recorded recovery sequence exists to verify this
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs zero side-deck cards

Why it scores here

This OCG list is illegal as submitted: Albion the Branded Dragon and D/D/D Wave High King Caesar are Forbidden and each is run once, so it does not receive a normal Final Contextual score and is capped low as a structural-only read. Structurally it has real interaction density, with 7 hand traps and 18 removal-text cards, and its Midrange shell can reach Fiendsmith and Musket starters, but the three archetype engines (Musket 13, Fiendsmith 11, Mulcharmy 6 of 55 main-deck copies, 19.4% exact-name purity) compete for hand space and do not form one connected engine. The 25% hypergeometric chance of a 3-copy starter in a 5-card opening hand is a Inferred consistency estimate, and no recorded boards exist to show what the deck converts into. The score comes from consistency, interaction and the system as a whole, not from averaging the card scores and not from archetype popularity, which the evidence does not measure. The empty side deck caps post-side adaptability near zero.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 43.2, Going First ≈ 42, Going Second ≈ 48, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 35. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-12). Final formula: Illegal cap: 0.80*Structural(43.2) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(35) = 41.6, then banlist-exposure modifier -12 = 29.6, rounded to 30; Meta provisional

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.25 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense hand-trap and negation coverage (7 hand traps, 11 negation-text cards)
• Multiple draw and search sources (Mulcharmy, Caspar, Doc, Pot of Sloth)
• Extra Deck covers Link, Fusion, Synchro and Xyz options

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: two Forbidden Extra Deck cards
• Three engines (Musket, Fiendsmith, Mulcharmy) share a 55-card main deck at 19.4% exact-name purity
• Empty side deck
• No recorded boards or matchup data to verify any combo claim

Critical choke points

• Single-copy Limited starters and interaction (Fiendsmith's Lacrima, Engraver, Tract) cannot be replaced once used
• Fiendsmith monster access depends on Tract or Engraver search, which are 1-copy cards

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 55, Extra 12, Side 0 counts vs OCG size rules (main 40-60, extra 0-15, side 0-15); Albion the Branded Dragon and D/D/D Wave High King Caesar are Forbidden and each run once; Ash Blossom and The Fallen & The Virtuous run at 2 copies, within Semi-Limited limit; Hypergeometric draw odds and card text from the evidence pack
• Observed: Usage stats: 60% of core cards present (15 of 25), with Fiendsmith's Requiem, Agnumday, Sequence and Max missing from core
• Inferred: Consistency and brick estimates from composition and probabilities; Interaction quality from card text; Going-second value from hand-trap density
• Provisional: Meta Power and format fit: no tournament_context or dated metagame sample
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchup, or brick/starter rates Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Side deck is empty, so no post-side evidence exists Deck title is null