Tenpai Dragon Deck #767512 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG
58 Main, 15 Extra, incl. Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3, Nibiru, the Primal Being x3, Tenpai Dragon Paidra x3. Created Oct 20, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/20/2026
Main Deck (58)
- Bystial Magnamhut x1
- Droll & Lock Bird x1
- Fallen of the White Dragon x2
- Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3
- Mulcharmy Purulia x2
- Nibiru, the Primal Being x3
- Tenpai Dragon Fadra x1
- Tenpai Dragon Genroku x2
- Tenpai Dragon Paidra x3
- Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3
- Effect Veiler x3
- Fydraulis Harmonia x3
- Ghost Ogre & Snow Rabbit x2
- Incredible Ecclesia, the Virtuous x2
- Tenpai Dragon Chundra x1
- Witness of the Ancient x1
- Angelechy Endgame Problem x1
- Heat Wave x3
- Pot of Sloth x2
- Rainbow Bridge Bifrost x2
- Sangen Kaimen x1
- Sangen Summoning x1
- Terraforming x1
- Angelechy Disturbance x1
- Angelechy Opening to e4 x3
- Angelechy Verdict x2
- Gravity Collapse x3
- Infinite Impermanence x3
- Solemn Accusation x2
Extra Deck (15)
- Angelechy Bastion x1
- Angelechy Castellan x1
- Angelechy Destrier x1
- Angelechy Seneschal x2
- Angelechy Shatranga x2
- Despian Luluwalilith x1
- Enigmaster Packbit x1
- Glitch Clutch Nullgainer x1
- Sangenpai Transcendent Dragion x1
- Trident Dragion x1
- Angelechy Enlisted x1
- Golden Cloud Beast - Malong x1
- Sangenpai Bident Dragion x1
error
Couldn't load the deck
37± 10/ 100
Power Score
Structural
51
Reliability
40
Going First
48
Going Second
52
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 37/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 51 |
| Going First | 48 |
| Going Second | 52 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 40 |
- Primary strategy: Midrange
- Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
- Format: ocg
Legality
Main 58 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 1 violation(s).
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Synchro Summon 3000-ATK boss monsters (Angelechy Seneschal, Angelechy Shatranga, Trident Dragion) backed by Tenpai Dragon and Sangen board presence; Tenpai Dragon recursion through Fadra, Genroku and Chundra for repeated Synchro pressure
- Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Tenpai Dragon Paidra to search a Sangen spell, then build toward a Tuner plus non-Tuner Synchro; no going-first interaction outside the searchers and Terraforming
- Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Effect Veiler, Ghost Ogre and Droll & Lock Bird for the opponent's first activations, then Angelechy Opening to e4 or Synchro through the surviving board
- Recovery: Recover via Tenpai Dragon Genroku and Fadra Special Summons from the GY and Sangen Kaimen or Sangen Summoning searches
- After siding: Not applicable: the OCG deck has no side deck (Side Deck size 0)
Why it scores here
The deck is Illegal under the OCG copy limit (3 copies of Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring against a limit of 2), so it receives a low structural-only cap rather than a normal contextual score. Its strongest signal is interaction: 15 hand traps and 17 negation or removal texts give it broad answers to the opponent's first actions (Inferred from card text). The engine reliably appears in the opening hand (archetype core about 86% at least one in a 5-card hand, Inferred), but only 9.6% of main-deck copies are exact Tenpai Dragon names, so the engine is split across Angelechy, Mulcharmy, Sangen, Greed and generic cards. No combos were supplied, so the floor, median and ceiling scores are text-only inferences and carry wide uncertainty. Archetype popularity (core cards at 90%+ usage) confirms the list is real and accessible but earned no points; scores were computed on the system and not averaged from card scores.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 60 | Archetype core present in 5-card opening hand about 86% of the time (hypergeometric estimate, Inferred); 2-card starts depend on the split engine (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 45 | Many hand traps and situational cards (14 traps, 11 spells, 25 level-0 cards) raise dead-card risk in hand; no brick-rate measurement exists (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 50 | No recorded boards; ceiling is a text-based read of 3000-ATK Synchros and Angelechy column effects (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 40 | No recorded boards, so the median output is unmeasured; the split engine suggests a modest typical outcome (Inferred) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 60 | Several independent hand traps and two or more Synchro routes give redundancy after one interruption (Inferred from card text) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 50 | Recursion through Genroku, Fadra and Chundra and Sangen search effects offset spend, but there is no resource telemetry (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 75 | Interaction density is high: 17 negation or removal texts and 15 hand traps, with layered Spell/Trap answers (Inferred from text; flags verified) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 55 | Going-second interaction is strong through hand traps and Angelechy Opening to e4, but there is no going-second split data (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 55 | Several 3000-ATK Synchros and Nibiru-style pressure give closing power, but no end-board data exists (Inferred) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 40 | Only 9.6% exact archetype purity and 66 off-archetype copies over 58 cards reduce compactness and coherence (verified count, Inferred effect) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 60 | 15 Extra Deck Synchros with a mix of Angelechy, Sangen and generic threats, and 3 Synchro Tuners to fill access (verified composition, Inferred) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 10 | No side deck is allowed in this OCG format, so no post-side plan exists (verified) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 40 | No tournament link or dated meta sample; archetype share is unknown, so this is provisional |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 45 | Several column-based and conditional effects, plus Angelechy and Tenpai sequencing, raise decision load (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 51, Going First ≈ 48, Going Second ≈ 52, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Illegal copy limit (-12). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) = 48.8, then Illegal copy-limit modifier -12 -> 37 (structural-only cap)
Probability & combo summary
- Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.86 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
- Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
- Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines
Strengths
- Dense interaction: 15 hand traps and 17 negation or removal texts
- Archetype core (Tenpai Dragon Paidra, Fadra, Genroku, Chundra, Sangen support) is present in most opening hands
- Redundant Synchro routes to 3000-ATK boss monsters
Weaknesses
- Illegal under OCG copy limit (Ash Blossom 3 vs 2)
- Low archetype purity (9.6% exact name) with split engines
- No side deck, so no post-side adjustment
- No combo or tournament data to confirm conversion
Critical choke points
- Tenpai Dragon Paidra and Sangen searches as the opening engine
- Single Chundra copy as the Synchro-to-Tenpai bridge
- Going-first lines lean on Terraforming and the Sangen search chain
Recommended changes
| Priority | Remove | Add | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 copy of Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring | 1 copy of Tenpai Dragon Genroku (raises it from 2 to 3) | Restores the OCG copy limit and makes the core Tenpai engine more consistent, which is the main path to a legal and normal contextual score |
| 2 | 1 off-archetype tech card | 1 additional Sangen or Tenpai Dragon support card | Raises archetype purity above 9.6% and reduces dead-card risk; it does not need to replace an interaction card |
Evidence & confidence
- Verified: Main deck 58, Extra 15, Side 0 against OCG size rules; Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring: 3 copies vs legal 2 (Illegal); All other restricted cards at 1 copy within their limits; Exact archetype purity 9.6% (7 of 73 copies); Archetype core card inclusion from usage stats
- Inferred: At least one archetype core card in 5-card opening hand about 86% (hypergeometric); Interaction density is high from card text (negation and removal flags); Going-second strength from hand traps; Synchro boss pressure from ATK values and text
- Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament link)
- Data gaps: No combos supplied; floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot records absent No win-rate telemetry; going-first and going-second splits are Inferred Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Deck title is null
error
Couldn't load the combos
Menu
https://metaduelist.com/