Therions Deck #767443 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

55 Main, 14 Extra, incl. Cyber Dragon Core x3, Cyberdark Claw x3, K9-17 Izuna x3. Created Oct 20, 2026 by YGO Mod.

Deck Therions OCG

Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)

Created On: 10/20/2026

 
 


Official AI Deck Power Analysis
MidrangeConfidence: Low
34± 10/ 100
Power Score
Structural 47
Reliability 40
Going First 45
Going Second 55

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 34/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

Overall score Value
Structural Deck Power 47
Going First 45
Going Second 55
Meta Power provisional
Tournament Reliability 40
  • Primary strategy: Midrange
  • Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Stun
  • Format: ocg

Legality

Main 56 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

  • Win condition: Extra-Deck boss monsters (K9-X "Werewolf", K9-X "Ripper/M", Divine Arsenal AA-ZEUS, Chimeratech Rampage Dragon) backed by Cyber Dragon / K9 / Cyberdark support, with no recorded line to confirm conversion.; Hand-trap and negation-driven disruption (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Ghost Belle, Effect Veiler, Droll & Lock Bird) that stalls the opponent while the board is built.
  • Turn 1 (going first): Open with searchers (Cyber Dragon Core, Cyberdark Realm, K9-66b Lantern, Clockwork Night) to reach a Cyber Dragon or K9 Xyz route; the first Normal Summon is the main unknown because the list has no starter-specific structure beyond the shared core.
  • Turn 2 (going second): Hold hand traps (19 hand-trap-tagged cards, about 93% to have one in a 6-card going-second hand per the hypergeometric estimate) to negate the opponent's first engine play, then build into an Extra-Deck boss.
  • Recovery: Recover through Mulcharmy draw effects, Cyberdark Claw and Clockwork Knight recursion and the K9 Quick-Play searches; the recovery path exists in text but is not verified on any recorded board.
  • After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has zero Side Deck cards, so there is no post-side plan to assess.

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a system: it is built from several sub-archetypes (Cyber Dragon, K9, Cyberdark, Mulcharmy, Therion) with only 0 cards in the exact Therions name, so its engine coherence is limited (D1 40). Its strength is interaction, with 19 hand-trap-tagged cards and 16 negation-text cards that give a strong going-second disruption profile (D7 62, D8 60), and a searcher density that makes the core reachable (D6 55). Its weaknesses are the absence of any recorded combo (D3 and D4 rest on text inference only), the absence of a Side Deck (D12 10) and an Illegal list that puts two cards over their OCG limit. The score does not come from Therions being a popular archetype and does not come from averaging individual card scores. Because the list is Illegal, it receives no normal Final Contextual score: it is capped low and the result is structural and theoretical only.

Dimension scores

# Dimension Score Evidence
D1 Engine Accessibility & Consistency 40 P(at least one of the 9 archetype-core copies in a 5-card opener) is about 0.60; the engine is split across five sub-archetypes with no exact-name core (Inferred)
D2 Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management 45 Hand-trap and generic density (19 hand-trap-tagged, 31 generic copies) limits dead hands, but 17 singletons and sub-archetype mismatch raise brick risk (Inferred)
D3 Combo Conversion & Ceiling 40 No parseable boards exist (total_combos 0); the ceiling is inferred only from text such as Cyber Dragon Nova and K9-X Werewolf (Inferred)
D4 Combo Floor & Median Output 35 No combo evidence, so the median output cannot be measured; any figure is a text-level guess (Inferred)
D5 Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy 50 Multiple hand traps and negations give disruption resilience, but there is no recorded second independent line (Inferred)
D6 Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind 55 Searcher text is present in 20 cards with P(at least one searcher in a 5-card opener) about 0.90 (Inferred)
D7 End-Board & Interaction Quality 62 16 negation-text and 13 removal-text cards, with layered boss-level removal in the Extra Deck (Inferred semantic)
D8 Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power 60 Hand-trap group reaches about 0.93 in a going-second 6-card hand; no win-rate telemetry exists (Inferred)
D9 Offensive Pressure & Closing Power 55 Extra Deck threats reach 3000 to 3300 ATK (K9-X Werewolf, K9-X Ripper/M, Divine Arsenal AA-ZEUS) (Verified stat, Inferred closing)
D10 Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility 50 56-card Main with 30 distinct cards and 17 singletons; the 40 to 60 size rule is met but copy balance is off (Verified structure, Inferred flexibility)
D11 Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage 45 14 Extra Deck cards across Fusion, Synchro, Xyz and Link with no shared route, so each slot is only partly used (Inferred)
D12 Side Deck Adaptability 10 No Side Deck is present (side_count 0), so post-side adaptability is effectively unscored (Verified structure)
D13 Matchup Coverage & Format Fit 40 No tournament link, so archetype share and matchup data are absent; the score is provisional (Provisional)
D14 Pilotability & Error Tolerance 35 Three or more engines and multiple decision trees for each starter make the deck demanding for a new pilot (Inferred)

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary; no secondary weight applied. Structural ≈ 47, Going First ≈ 45, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Illegal copy-limit violation (-8); No Side Deck (-2); Multi-engine fragmentation (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); Illegal list, so the result is capped low and labelled structural/theoretical only

Probability & combo summary

  • Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.6 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.4 (all Inferred)
  • Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
  • Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

  • Dense hand-trap and negation suite (19 hand-trap-tagged, 16 negation-text) gives strong going-second disruption.
  • Searcher density (20 searcher-text cards, about 0.90 at least one in a 5-card opener) makes the core reachable.
  • Extra Deck carries high-ATK closers (K9-X Werewolf 3300, K9-X Ripper/M 3100, Divine Arsenal AA-ZEUS 3000).

Weaknesses

  • Illegal list: Ash Blossom and K9-17 Izuna each over the copy limit.
  • No recorded combos, so the ceiling and median are inferred from text only.
  • Five sub-archetypes compete for one Main Deck, reducing engine coherence.
  • No Side Deck, so there is no post-side adaptation.

Critical choke points

  • Legality: the list cannot be played in the OCG format until two copies of each over-limit card are removed.
  • Engine starter: the archetype-core group is only about 0.60 to appear in a 5-card opener.
  • Extra Deck dependence on K9 and Cyber Dragon Xyz routes.
Priority Remove Add Reason
1 One copy each of Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring and K9-17 Izuna (one of the three copies of each) No replacement required; a legal 2-copy list is the minimum change This makes the list legal. Without it no normal Final Contextual score can apply.
2 One or two singleton off-plan generics A Side Deck of 10 to 15 cards covering the main hand-trap and negation gaps A zero-card Side Deck gives no post-side plan (D12 10), and a Side Deck is the cheapest way to raise it.
3 Off-archetype singletons that do not feed the K9 or Cyber Dragon route Additional copies of the dominant sub-archetype core (for example K9 searchers) Engine coherence (D1) and brick management (D2) are both limited by the spread across five sub-archetypes.

Evidence & confidence

  • Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring and K9-17 Izuna each run 3 copies against an OCG limit of 2.; Main 56, Extra 14, Side 0, all within the OCG size rules except the zero-card Side Deck.; Extra Deck threat stats (K9-X Werewolf 3300 ATK, K9-X Ripper/M 3100 ATK, Divine Arsenal AA-ZEUS 3000 ATK).
  • Inferred: D1 engine consistency: P(at least one core copy in a 5-card opener) about 0.60.; D7 and D8 interaction and going-second strength, from hand-trap and negation text plus hypergeometric odds.; D6 searcher reach: P(at least one searcher in a 5-card opener) about 0.90.
  • Provisional: Meta Power is null because no dated metagame sample exists.; D13 matchup and format fit, since no tournament link is present.; Tournament Reliability (40) rests on text inference and no win-rate telemetry.
  • Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference. No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent. One CardIDList passcode could not be resolved to a card (counted as Main). No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick and starter rates) exists in YGOVN. Meta Power is provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied. Deck title is null, and there are no guides for the archetype.

More OCG Info

Therions

Therions Breakdown

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
https://metaduelist.com/
Top