Magnet Warriors Deck #767429 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 3 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Magnet Warrior / Magna Warrior Extra Deck boards (Conduction Warrior Plasma Magnum, Tellusion, Nibiru, Fiendsmith's Desirae) built from the Magnet searcher chain; Fiendsmith link and fusion boards via Fiendsmith's Tract and Fiendsmith Engraver, with Lacrima as a backup finisher
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Magnet searcher (Beta / Magnet Bonding / Sigma Minus), chain Level 4 Magnet Warriors into Conduction Warrior Linear Magnum, and protect the board with Dominus Purge, Solemn and Ash/Ghost hand traps
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold 1-2 hand traps (Infinite Impermanence, Ghost Belle, Ash Blossom, Droll) and negate the opponent's first summon or search, then rebuild through Magnet Bonding and Duoterion
• Recovery: Recover via Magnet Warrior searchers and Mulcharmy draw effects, plus Dark Ruler No More and Lightning Storm to clear the opponent's field, then rebuild Level 4 Magnet Warriors from the Deck
• After siding: No Side Deck is registered, so there is no post-side plan; the list cannot be adjusted between games

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a system, not as an average of its cards. Its searcher density (17 searcher-text cards, about 86% chance of at least one in a 5-card opening hand) and the Magnet/Magna Warrior core (about 97% chance of at least one core card) give it a reasonably reliable opening, though the 21 tech slots and 12 hand traps raise brick and dead-card risk. Interaction is the strongest area: 20 negation-text and 17 removal-text cards, plus Dominus Purge, Solemn and Lightning Storm, give it a layered end-board. Going second is good because hand traps are present in about 79% of six-card hands. Closing power comes from the Extra Deck Magna/Conduction Warrior and Fiendsmith boards, and the lack of a Side Deck and missing combo or match data keep the score low. Popularity did not add points: the archetype core presence (75% of usage-core cards present) only confirms the list is real, and the score is capped because the list is illegal.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 57, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 65, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 50. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-4). Final formula: Pre-cap: 0.80*Structural(57) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(50) + modifiers(-4) = 51.6; Illegal cap applied (legality status Illegal, no normal Final Contextual score) → 35. Meta Power provisional/null.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.86 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense searcher and archetype-core density gives reliable access to the engine
• Layered interaction (negates, hand traps, Dominus Purge, Solemn, Lightning Storm)
• Strong Extra Deck closers across Link, Fusion and Xyz

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy counts on three cards (Ash Blossom, Fiendsmith Engraver, Fiendsmith's Tract)
• No Side Deck at all
• 21 tech and 12 hand-trap slots raise brick and dead-card risk
• No combo boards or tournament data to verify conversion

Critical choke points

• Magnet Bonding / Beta searcher chain into the Level 4 Magnet Warriors that enable Linear Magnum
• Single-copy Fiendsmith's Lacrima and Solemn Judgment as sole answers to some boards

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom 3 vs 2, Fiendsmith Engraver 2 vs 1, Fiendsmith's Tract 2 vs 1; Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 sizes; Side Deck is empty; Card text and archetype usage stats (core present 12 of 16)
• Inferred: Searcher and core-access probabilities (≈0.86 and ≈0.97); Hand-trap frequency in going-second hands (≈0.79); Interaction density and brick risk from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power (null, no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format-fit scoring (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first/second and matchup signals are Inferred Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample