Exosister Deck #766533 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

40 Main, 15 Extra, incl. Exosister Elis x3, Exosister Martha x3, Mulcharmy Fuwalos x3. Created Oct 18, 2026 by YGO Mod.

Deck Exosister Master Duel

Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)

Created On: 10/18/2026

 
 


Official AI Deck Power Analysis
MidrangeConfidence: MediumEvaluated Oct 20, 2026
59± 7/ 100
Power Score
Structural 64
Reliability 58
Going First 66
Going Second 67

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 59/100 (±7 · Confidence: Medium)

Overall score Value
Structural Deck Power 63.7
Going First 66
Going Second 67
Meta Power provisional
Tournament Reliability 57.7
  • Primary strategy: Midrange
  • Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
  • Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

  • Win condition: Level 4 Exosister summons feeding Xyz boards (Magnifica, Karmael, Mikailis, Kaspitell) that attack and banish; Tiras and TY-PHON as backup Xyz bodies; Ecclesia and Albion as off-archetype extra-deck options
  • Turn 1 (going first): Search Exosister Betrayal or Pax, summon Level 4 Exosisters (Elis, Martha, Stella, Irene, Sophia), then Xyz Summon a Mikailis or Karmael
  • Turn 2 (going second): Hold hand traps (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Ghost Ogre, Droll, Maxx C, Effect Veiler) to answer the opponent's first board, then build the Exosister Xyz board
  • Recovery: Re-search with Pax, Betrayal and Irene; keep Ash and Ghost Ogre in hand as the recovery resource
  • After siding: No side deck in this list (side 0); no post-side plan can be evaluated

Why it scores here

The score comes from how the Exosister system opens and converts on the board, not from averaging card powers or from the archetype's popularity. Four 3-copy starters (Elis, Martha, Betrayal, Pax) give about a 34% chance each of appearing in a 5-card opening hand, and the 9 searcher-text cards lift the chance of at least one search to about 74% (Inferred). The 12 hand traps and 8 negation-text cards give strong interaction on the opponent's turn, which is the deck's main going-second strength. Its ceiling is Xyz boards with 2500 to 2900 ATK and banish or destroy effects, but there is no recorded combo data, so median output and ceiling are text-only estimates. The deck has no side deck, 27 off-archetype copies (about 49%), and its Extra Deck Xyz access depends on the opponent moving cards out of a graveyard, so it scores below its interaction strength. Popularity and usage stats confirm the list is real and accessible; they did not add points.

Dimension scores

# Dimension Score Evidence
D1 Engine Accessibility & Consistency 70 P(at least 1 of 3 copies of Elis, Martha, Betrayal or Pax in a 5-card hand) = 0.338; P(at least 1 searcher) = 0.742; Exosister core present (Inferred)
D2 Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management 58 12 hand traps and 13 tech cards can be dead without an opponent action; summon conditions on Martha and Elis add bricks (Inferred)
D3 Combo Conversion & Ceiling 66 Ceiling from Magnifica, Kaspitell, Karmael and Mikailis Xyz effects; no recorded boards to confirm (Inferred, text-only)
D4 Combo Floor & Median Output 55 No recorded boards, so floor and median are not measured; rely on starter diversity across 5 Level 4 Exosisters (Inferred)
D5 Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy 66 Several independent starters (Elis, Martha, Stella, Irene, Sophia) and hand traps give alternate routes after one disruption (Inferred)
D6 Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind 62 Pax costs 800 LP and Returnia 800 LP; Betrayal discards 1; Pax and Betrayal re-search, and Elis and Stella gain LP (Inferred)
D7 End-Board & Interaction Quality 76 Magnifica banish, Gibrine and Kaspitell negation, Ghost Ogre and Ash interaction, and Tiras destroy; 8 negation-text and 5 removal-text cards (Inferred)
D8 Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power 70 Hand traps give about a 90% chance of at least one on the opponent's turn when going second (Inferred); Ghost Ogre, Returnia and Tiras break boards (Inferred)
D9 Offensive Pressure & Closing Power 70 Magnifica 2800 ATK with a second attack in Battle Phase, TY-PHON 2900, Mikailis 2500, Karmael 2600 (Verified stats, Inferred closing power)
D10 Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility 58 40 main cards in 20 distinct names; 27 off-archetype copies with exact-name purity 50.9% (Verified counts); some splash (Mulcharmy, Branded, Ecclesia) (Inferred)
D11 Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage 62 13 Xyz plus Synchro and Fusion; 6 Exosister Xyz are core with Tiras and TY-PHON as generic backup (Verified composition, Inferred value)
D12 Side Deck Adaptability 35 Side count 0 in a Master Duel list with a 0 to 15 side allowance; no post-side plan exists (Verified count, no performance data)
D13 Matchup Coverage & Format Fit 50 No tournament link and no dated meta sample, so this is Provisional and set to a neutral 50 (Provisional)
D14 Pilotability & Error Tolerance 55 Multi-step Xyz summon conditions and hand-trap timing across two turns make this moderately demanding for the pilot (Inferred)

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 63.7, Going First ≈ 66, Going Second ≈ 67, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 57.7. Modifiers: Engine conflicts and splash (-2); Banlist exposure (-1). Final formula: Structural = sum(weight x score, D13 excluded) / 95 (meta-neutral, renormalised); Final = 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

  • Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
  • Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
  • Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

  • Four 3-copy starters and 9 searcher-text cards make the engine reliable on turn 1 and 2
  • 12 hand traps plus 8 negation-text cards give strong going-second interaction
  • Several Xyz finishers with 2500 to 2900 ATK and banish or destroy effects

Weaknesses

  • No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
  • Exosister Xyz access depends on the opponent moving cards out of a graveyard
  • Off-archetype splash (Mulcharmy, Branded, Ecclesia) dilutes the engine

Critical choke points

  • Level 4 Exosister summons: several Xyz routes need specific Level 4 Exosisters on the field
  • Martha's summon condition (no monsters or only Xyz on the field) limits its use
Priority Remove Add Reason
1 Mulcharmy Purulia (1 copy) Exosister Vadis (missing core card at 92.3% usage, per usage stats; Inferred, not checked against card text) Replaces an off-archetype splash with a core archetype card; the usage stats suggest the list is missing a standard card
2 Ghost Mourner & Moonlit Chill (1 copy) Consider a second Exosister Sophia or Irene if the Level 4 count is short Reduces the non-archetype count; the deck's engine depends on Level 4 Exosisters (Inferred)

Evidence & confidence

  • Verified: Legal in Master Duel: 40 main (within 40 to 60), 15 extra (within 0 to 15), 0 side (within 0 to 15); Restricted cards within legal copies: Maxx C 1/1 Limited; Droll and Fallen 2/2 Semi-Limited; Hypergeometric draw numbers recomputed and consistent (0.3376 for 3 copies in 5 cards)
  • Observed: Usage stats show the archetype core present in this list (flags undercount Extra Deck core, see data gaps)
  • Inferred: Starter reliability and brick risk from hypergeometric odds and card text; Interaction density and going-second strength from role hints and card text; Ceiling and floor estimates from Xyz card text (no recorded boards)
  • Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit: no dated metagame sample or tournament link
  • Data gaps: Deck title is null No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record are absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchup or brick rates Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample usage_statistics in_this_deck flags read false for Magnifica, Karmael, Mikailis, Gibrine, Asophiel and Kaspitell, which are present in the cards list; core coverage (52%) is understated, closer to 80% of named core cards present archetype_core_group reports 29 copies while archetype_spread reports 28 exact-name Exosister copies; the difference is unexplained No side deck in the list, so the side-deck dimension is scored on composition only

More Master Duel Info

Exosister

Exosister Breakdown

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
https://metaduelist.com/
Top