Cyber Dragon Deck #765784 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 45/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Tempo, Toolbox
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 41 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion, Link and Xyz boss monsters (Cyber End Dragon 4000 ATK, Chimeratech Rampage Dragon) plus Power Bond / Polymerization pressure; the guide evidence also describes an OTK route that spends LP.; Cyberdark and Mulcharmy sub-archetype value cards that add draw and recursion, not a separate finisher.
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Cyber Dragon Core (3 copies) to add a Cyber Spell/Trap, then extend through searchers and Cyber Dragon special summons. Per-card P(at least one Core in a 5-card opening) is about 0.33, so this line is not reliable on its own.
• Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand with a hand trap (Ash Blossom x3, Maxx C x1; P(at least one hand trap) about 0.48) to stop the opponent's first extension, then the same engine. The side plan is absent.
• Recovery: Searcher-heavy text (20 searcher-text cards, P(at least one searcher in hand) about 0.97) and Cyber Dragon Core / Cyberdark Claw recursion are the stated recovery routes. Recovery quality is Inferred from card text only.
• After siding: None. The deck runs 0 side-deck cards, so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The deck opens a functional plan on a moderate schedule: eight starter-class cards (3 Cyber Dragon Core, 2 Cyber Dragon, Nachster, Herz, Jormungardr) give about a 0.68 chance of at least one starter in a 5-card opening, and about 0.75 going second. Conversion is strong on paper because the Extra Deck carries several high-ATK finishers, but no recorded boards exist, so the ceiling is text-based and the median is unknown. Interaction is real but narrow: three Ash Blossom, one Maxx C, and a few negation and removal effects, with no way to check layering. Brick risk, a 25.5% exact-archetype purity with five off-archetype Mulcharmy cards and Cyberdark cards, and a zero-card side deck pull the score down. Popularity and archetype usage did not earn points, and card scores were not averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 55, Going First ≈ 54, Going Second ≈ 52, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 42. Modifiers: Engine conflicts (-3); Weak post-side plan (-2); Unrecoverable choke point (-2); Banlist exposure (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional; 0.80*55.3 + 0.20*42 - 8 = 44.7, rounded to 45)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.68 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Eight starter-class cards and about 0.68 to 0.75 starter access by hypergeometric estimate
• Multiple searchers (20 searcher-text cards) and redundant recovery routes
• Strong Extra Deck finishers (Cyber End Dragon 4000 ATK, Chimeratech Rampage, Super Dora 3200)
• Interaction density across three Ash Blossom, Maxx C and negation text

Weaknesses

• Zero side-deck cards, so no post-side adaptation
• Low archetype purity (25.5%) with five off-archetype Mulcharmy cards in the main deck
• 17 singleton slots raise brick rate and reduce consistency
• Only one hand trap in many hands, with weak recovery after it is used

Critical choke points

• Cyber Dragon Core and Cyber Dragon as the first-turn starters (P about 0.33 and 0.23 in a 5-card hand)
• Single hand trap in the going-second hand (P about 0.48 for at least one of four)

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 41, Extra 14, Side 0 all within master-duel size rules; Maxx C Limited with 1 of 1 copy run; all other cards Unlimited; Extra Deck breakdown: 6 fusion, 4 link, 4 xyz; Exact-name purity 25.5%; archetype_spread lists 12 sub-archetypes
• Observed: No recorded boards or combos exist to observe
• Inferred: Starter hypergeometric 0.68 (5) and 0.75 (6) from the 8 starter copies; Brick risk from singletons and hand-trap concentration; Interaction density and board-breaking read from card text; D1 through D14 scores
• Provisional: Meta Power is null; D13 matchup fit is Provisional with no dated meta sample
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; meta-share and pilot record absent Unresolved passcode 10443957 counted as main Usage stats mark Clockwork Knight, Cyber Dragon Nova, Cyber Eternity Dragon, Chimeratech Megafleet, Chimeratech Fortress, Heosvarog, Cyber Dragon Sieger and Sky Striker Ace - Azalea as in_this_deck:false with copies 0, yet all appear in the cards array in the Extra zone; the missing_core list is therefore unreliable No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick, OTK rates) Meta Power provisional without a dated metagame sample