Despia Deck #765686 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG
45 Main, 15 Extra, incl. Aluber the Jester of Despia x3, Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3, Branded Opening x3. Created Oct 14, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 10/14/2026
Main Deck (45)
- Aluber the Jester of Despia x3
- Bystial Druiswurm x1
- Bystial Magnamhut x1
- Despian Tragedy x1
- Dogmatika Ecclesia, the Virtuous x1
- Dogmatika Fleurdelis, the Knighted x1
- Dogmatika Maximus x1
- Fallen of Albaz x1
- Fallen of the White Dragon x2
- Springans Kitt x1
- The Bystial Lubellion x2
- Tri-Brigade Springans Kitt x1
- Dark Magician x1
- Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3
- Blazing Cartesia, the Virtuous x2
- Guiding Quem, the Virtuous x1
- Incredible Ecclesia, the Virtuous x1
- Branded Fusion x1
- Branded in High Spirits x2
- Branded Lost x1
- Branded Opening x3
- Branded Regained x1
- Called by the Grave x1
- Fusion Deployment x3
- Gold Sarcophagus x1
- Nadir Servant x3
- The Fallen & The Virtuous x3
- Branded Banishment x1
- Branded Retribution x1
Extra Deck (15)
- Albion the Branded Dragon x2
- Albion the Sanctifire Dragon x1
- Despian Proskenion x1
- Despian Quaeritis x1
- Granguignol the Dusk Dragon x1
- Lubellion the Searing Dragon x1
- Masquerade the Blazing Dragon x1
- Mirrorjade the Iceblade Dragon x1
- Red-Eyes Dark Dragoon x1
- Rindbrumm the Striking Dragon x1
- The Dragon that Devours the Dogma x1
- Titaniklad the Ash Dragon x1
- Despian Luluwalilith x1
- Ecclesia and the Dark Dragon x1
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 61 |
| Going First | 60 |
| Going Second | 60 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 45 |
- Primary strategy: Combo
- Secondary strategies: Midrange, Toolbox
- Format: tcg
Legality
Main 45 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 3 violation(s).
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: Fusion Summon high-ATK Albaz/Branded Fusion Monsters (Albion, Titaniklad, Granguignol, Dragon that Devours the Dogma) from Fallen of Albaz-based fusion lines, then close with 2500-3200 ATK boards.; Hand-trap-protected board with Synchro/Tuner access (Ecclesia and the Dark Dragon, Despian Luluwalilith) and direct damage from Fusion effects.
- Turn 1 (going first): Turn 1 Branded Opening or Nadir Servant into a Fallen of the White Dragon / Fallen of Albaz starter, then Branded Fusion or Fallen-based Fusion Summon into a 2500+ ATK fusion while protecting with Ash Blossom.
- Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Called by the Grave and Branded Retribution to disrupt the opponent's Fusion/Synchro setup, then recover through Fallen-based fusion and GY recursion.
- Recovery: Recover from interruption via Branded Regained, Fallen of Albaz GY-to-hand searches, Despian Tragedy and Branded Banishment from the GY.
- After siding: No side deck is registered, so no post-side plan can be evaluated; this is a structural gap.
Why it scores here
The deck opens reliably: the archetype core group has an estimated 0.99 chance of at least one piece in a 5-card opening hand, and redundant starters (Fallen of the White Dragon, Branded Opening, Aluber, Nadir Servant) give several independent first-turn routes (Inferred). Its ceiling is high because the Extra Deck holds several 2500 to 3200 ATK Fusion boards and Branded Fusion/Albion chains, but no recorded boards exist, so conversion is a textual read only (Inferred). Interaction is dense, with three Ash Blossom copies, Branded Retribution, Called by the Grave and Branded Lost, which supports going-second play and recovery (Inferred). Popularity and archetype usage confirm the list is a real, accessible build but did not earn points by themselves, and card scores were not averaged. The score is capped low because the list is illegal in TCG (three cards over their copy limits) and there is no side deck or win-rate data.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 72 | P(core group >=1 in hand5) ~0.99; redundant Fallen-of-Albaz starters across 2-3 copies each (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 60 | 21 zero-level non-monster slots and many conditional Extra-Deck-enabling spells raise brick risk moderately (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 70 | High textual ceiling via Albion/Titaniklad/Granguignol chains; no recorded boards to measure PowerIndex (Inferred) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 55 | No combos supplied, so floor and median are not measurable; kept near neutral (Provisional) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 62 | Three hand traps plus Branded Retribution and Branded Lost give alternate routes after one disruption (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 60 | GY recursion via Fallen of Albaz, Despian Tragedy, Branded Banishment and Branded Regained; no resource telemetry (Inferred) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 70 | 10 negation-text cards, 3 hand traps and 13 removal-text cards; layering is strong but Ash Blossom is over the copy limit (Inferred, text-based) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 60 | Hand-trap and Called by the Grave density supports going-second play; no going-second win data (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 68 | Multiple 2500 to 3200 ATK Fusion bodies and direct-damage text give closing power (Inferred) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 45 | Only 15% exact-archetype purity with 51 off-archetype copies across Bystial, Albaz Dragon, Dogmatika, Springans and Dark Magician (verified from composition) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 55 | 13 Fusion and 2 Synchro Extra-Deck slots, several of which compete for the same materials (Inferred) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 20 | No side deck registered in a best-of-3 format (verified, side_count 0) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 50 | No tournament or meta-share data, so format fit is neutral (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 45 | Multi-step fusion lines with many decision points and hand-trap timing (Inferred) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Combo primary, no secondary weights applied. Structural ≈ 61, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 60, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-4); engine_conflicts (-3); no_side_deck (-2). Final formula: Illegal list: theoretical/structural-only. Unconstrained no-meta Final = 0.80*61 + 0.20*45 + modifiers(-9) = 49; capped to 35 for the illegal copy-limit violations.
Couldn't load the combos
