Egyptian God Deck #765628 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 20/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Stun
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Lunalight Fusion Monsters (Leo, Liger, Perfume, Sabre Dancers) backed by Lunalight recursion and Polymerization access; Lunalight Tiger / Wolf Pendulum and Link/Xyz follow-up (Mediclius, Dugares, Tiger King)
• Turn 1 (going first): Lunalight starter (Masquerade, Gold Leo, Black Sheep, Kaleido Chick) into a Lunalight Fusion via Heavy Polymerization or Super Polymerization; Ash Blossom / Droll & Lock Bird held for opposing Polymerization or searches
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom and Droll & Lock Bird (7 hand traps combined) to interrupt the opponent's board, then rebuild through Lunalight GY recursion
• Recovery: Lunalight monsters recycle from GY and banish (Yellow Marten, Silver Hound, Emerald Bird, Perfume Dancer) to re-enable Polymerization and Lunalight searches
• After siding: No side deck is run; no post-side plan can be evaluated

Why it scores here

The deck's real engine is the Lunalight core (26 of 55 main cards), which is reliably accessible: P(at least one Lunalight core card in a 5-card opening hand) is about 0.98 (Inferred), and Polymerization-type access from its six copies is about 0.45 per opening hand (Inferred). Its ceiling is high because a Lunalight Fusion Monster reaches 3000–3800 ATK with second attacks, and the deck carries seven or eight hand-trap and negation effects (Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Evenly Matched, Lunalight Silver Hound, Emerald Bird) that give it interaction on the system. Its weaknesses are brick risk from 13 tech cards and three Sphere Mode copies that need three Tributes, and the list has no recorded combos or win-rate data, so the median is inferred and kept low. The popularity of the Egyptian God label and the usage stats confirm the list is real, but they earned no points; the score comes from the system's consistency, median output, and interaction, not from averaging card scores. The list is Illegal because Number 41: Bagooska is Forbidden and run once, so the score is capped at a theoretical, structural-only 20.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo profile used as primary; Stun secondary only as a label, no weight blend. Structural ≈ 57.5, Going First ≈ 52, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: illegal_list_cap (-12). Final formula: Illegal list: theoretical/structural-only cap. Normal formula 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability would give about 55, but it is not reported because the list is Illegal; Structural 57.5 is shown for reference only

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.98 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Lunalight core is accessible and redundant (26 cards, ~0.98 P(≥1) in hand)
• Seven Lunalight fusion monsters give high-ATK closing power
• Seven hand-trap and negation effects provide interaction

Weaknesses

• Number 41: Bagooska is Forbidden and makes the list Illegal
• 13 tech slots and 3 Sphere Mode copies raise brick risk
• Archetype label (Egyptian God) does not match the real Lunalight engine (4.3% exact purity)
• No side deck and no combo or win-rate evidence

Critical choke points

• Polymerization access (6 copies) gates every Lunalight Fusion Summon
• Forbidden Bagooska must be removed before the list can be legal

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 within TCG size rules; Bagooska Forbidden, legal copies 0, run 1 (over limit); Copy limits met for all other Limited and Semi-Limited cards; Extra Deck breakdown: 9 fusion, 3 link, 3 xyz
• Inferred: P(≥1 Lunalight core in 5-card hand) ≈ 0.98; P(≥1 Polymerization-type in 5-card hand) ≈ 0.45; Brick risk from 13 tech cards and 3 Sphere Mode copies; Ceiling and interaction reads from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and D13 matchup fit; Going-first and going-second split (no data)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median, and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates) Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Side deck empty; post-side performance cannot be evaluated