Cyber Dragon Deck #765359 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 44/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Midrange, Fusion/Xyz/Link extra-deck pressure
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Boss from the Extra Deck (Cyber End Dragon, Cyber Dragon Infinity, Super Dora, Heosvarog) after a Cyber Dragon Core / Cyber Emergency search chain; secondary is Power Bond / Polymerization or Future Fusion Nova converting the Machine board into one large monster.; Cyberdark Realm / Cyberdark Claw / Clockwork Night recursion into Xyz and Link pressure on the going-second board.
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Cyber Dragon Core to search a Cyber Emergency or Cybernetic Overflow, then build a Link or Xyz board with Clockwork Knight and Cyber Dragon Nova where the extra-deck cards are reachable (Inferred from card text).
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash Blossom or Maxx C to answer the opponent's first starter, then rebuild through Cyber Dragon Herz or Nachster and the Core/Emergency searches toward a single boss (Inferred).
• Recovery: Recur Cyber Dragon monsters from the GY via Cyber Dragon Nova, Cyberdark Claw and Cyber Dragon Nachster, and re-search Cyber Dragon Core and Cyberdark Realm (Inferred).
• After siding: None. The deck runs 0 side cards, so there is no post-side plan (Verified by list).

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens a searcher and starter chain: three Cyber Dragon Core, three Cyber Emergency and three Cyberdark Claw give a high probability of at least one live search in the opening five cards, although each starter is conditional. Its conversion ceiling comes from a strong Extra Deck of Link, Xyz and Fusion bosses, but no recorded boards exist, so median output and the ceiling are both inferred from card text rather than measured. Interaction is respectable on paper (four hand traps, Cybernetic Overflow, two negate-style effects), yet it is only four hand traps and no sideboard, so resilience and going-second breaking remain weak. The score comes from consistency, median output and interaction on the whole system; archetype popularity earned no points, and card scores were not averaged. Guide authors describe the deck as a meme or support build that bricks easily and mixes poorly with other engines, which is consistent with the 27 percent exact-name purity and the Mulcharmy pieces that conflict with a Cyber Dragon board.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: D13 dropped and remaining Combo weights re-normalised (sum 97) because meta is provisional. Structural ≈ 52, Going First ≈ 49, Going Second ≈ 45, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 42. Modifiers: engine conflicts (-4); no side deck (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta null/provisional): 0.80*52.3 + 0.20*42 - 6 = 44.2

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Four hand traps and multiple searchers give redundant starter access
• Strong Extra Deck boss density (4000, 3200, 2800 ATK options)
• Legal list with correct size and Maxx C at its limit

Weaknesses

• No sideboard
• Exact-name purity of 27 percent with Mulcharmy and other sub-archetype conflicts
• High brick and dead-card risk from conditional starters and singletons

Critical choke points

• Single Cyber Dragon Core or Cyber Emergency search line
• Ash Blossom and Maxx C as the only early disruption answers

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main 40, Extra 15, Side 0 are legal for master-duel; Maxx C is Limited and run at 1 of 1; Exact-name purity is 27.3 percent
• Inferred: Starter access and brick rate from hypergeometric and card text; Interaction quality from negation and removal text; Going-first and going-second plans from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power is null; D13 excluded from Structural; Guide claims that the deck is not meta-viable
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry; going-first, going-second and matchup rates are unknown usage_statistics in_this_deck flags are false for Extra Deck cards that the cards list shows as present (e.g. Clockwork Knight, Cyber Dragon Sieger, Cyber Eternity Dragon), so the 64 percent core coverage and missing_core list are unreliable and were not used Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample