Greed Deck #765254 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Tempo
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Board pressure from Blitzclique-based and Branded/Mulcharmy-supported monsters (Whisker Blitzclique, Albion the Branded Dragon, Psychic End Punisher, Super Starslayer TY-PHON) converting a hand-trap-protected first board; Fusion and Synchro bosses through Ecclesia and Stardust routes; Pot of Sloth and Pot of Prosperity card advantage over long games
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Blitzclique searcher or starter (Emi, Grain, Crackle, Overvolt) and build a Thunder board while holding Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird and Nibiru as interaction
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the 6-card hand to present Ash Blossom, Droll, Nibiru and Solemn Accusation against the opponent's first summon or search, then extend through Mulcharmy draw effects
• Recovery: Mulcharmy Fuwalos and Mulcharmy Purulia draw cards once the board is empty; the searcher text (19 cards) is the main refill route
• After siding: No side deck is registered, so no post-side plan can be evaluated

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a system, not by averaging its cards. Its strongest feature is access: about 69% of 5-card openings contain at least one of the 11 archetype-core cards, and the 19 searcher-text cards give about 89% at least one search in hand (Inferred from hypergeometric estimates). Eight hand traps and thirteen negation-text cards give it a credible interaction layer, especially going second, where a 6-card hand has about a 63% chance of holding one. The list spans several sub-archetypes (Blitzclique 22 copies, Branded 6, Mulcharmy 6, Solemn 3, Ecclesia 2, plus generic staples) with only 5.7% exact-name Greed purity, so engine coherence is weaker than the Greed label suggests, and that drags down brick management and pilotability. The deck is Illegal as submitted (two cards run one copy over the TCG limit) and has no side deck, so the Final score is capped at a theoretical value. Popularity and archetype usage were not used to add points, because they only show that the list is real and accessible.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 58, Going First ≈ 55, Going Second ≈ 60, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 52. Modifiers: Copy-limit violations (-8); Banlist exposure (-2); No side deck (-2). Final formula: Illegal cap applied: 0.80*58 + 0.20*52 = 56.8, minus 12 modifiers = 44.8, capped to theoretical 35 because the list is Illegal (Meta provisional, null)