DoomZ Deck #765071 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 60/100 (±7 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Midrange
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 42 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz Summon high-ATK DoomZ / Power Patron Xyz monsters (Jupiter, Varudras, AA-ZEUS, Drastrius, Break) from the Extra Deck and attack or destroy to close; Vidolium 5000 ATK Pendulum pressure and DoomZ Command equip recursion
• Turn 1 (going first): Open on a searcher or starter (Power Patron DoomZ, Elara, Drastea, Jupredo, Terminus) to add a DoomZ or Power Patron piece, then Xyz Summon while holding a hand trap for the opponent's response
• Turn 2 (going second): Use the 11 hand traps (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Effect Veiler, Ghost Mourner, Ghost Ogre, Maxx C) to stop the opponent's board, then rebuild the Xyz engine through the Deck
• Recovery: Recover via searchers (DoomZ Raiders, DoomZ Change, Amalthe) and Xyz materials/graveyard recursion (Medius, Power Patron Portal) after an interruption
• After siding: No side deck (0 cards); no post-side plan exists in this format, so the deck relies on its main-deck plans only

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens its DoomZ and Power Patron starters (3 copies each, plus searchers at P(>=1 in hand 5) about 0.95) and has redundant ways to rebuild its Xyz engine after disruption, which is what drives D1 and D5. Its 11 hand traps and 10 negation-text cards give it a credible stun and interaction layer for the going-second turn (D7, D8), while the 3000+ ATK Extra Deck Xyz monsters carry real closing power (D9). Its weaknesses are the 40% exact-name archetype purity, 16 generic cards and 3 Mulcharmy cards that dilute the engine, a thin going-first hand-trap brick risk, and no side deck or post-side plan, all of which hold the score down. No recorded boards exist, so the median and ceiling reads are text-based inference only. Archetype popularity and the usage-statistics core coverage did not earn points on their own; the score comes from the system's consistency, interaction and closing power, not from averaging card scores.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo primary (Stun-leaning interaction noted; no blend applied to weights). Structural ≈ 64.7, Going First ≈ 66, Going Second ≈ 68, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 60. Modifiers: Engine conflict / mixed sub-archetypes (-2); Weak post-side plan (-2); Banlist exposure (0). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); 0.80*64.7 + 0.20*60 = 63.8, then modifiers -4 = 59.8, rounded to 60

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.95 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Redundant starters at 3 copies each with a near-certain searcher group (P 0.95)
• Eleven hand traps and 10 negation-text cards give layered going-second interaction
• Extra Deck ceilings of 3000+ ATK with Vidolium 5000 ATK pressure

Weaknesses

• 40.4% exact-name archetype purity with 16 generic and 3 Mulcharmy cards diluting the engine
• Hand-trap bricks on going-first hands
• No side deck, so no post-side plan
• No recorded combos, so median and ceiling are unmeasured

Critical choke points

• The Power Patron DoomZ and Drastea starter lines (1 and 2 copies) carry the early engine; losing them to hand traps or early negation shifts the deck to searchers only
• Xyz Summon requires two or three matching materials, so one lost material can stall the closing turn

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal size: 42 main (40-60), 15 extra (0-15), 0 side; Maxx C at 1 copy, its Limited legal limit; Copy histogram 1:8, 2:5, 3:8 (21 distinct main)
• Observed: Usage stats: DoomZ core cards at 100% inclusion (Power Patron DoomZ, DoomZ Destruction, DoomZ Change, Ash Blossom, A.D.R.A.S.T.E.I.A.)
• Inferred: Hypergeometric starter and hand-trap probabilities; Strategy classification and functional roles from card text; Structural and final score derived from the rubric weights; Going-first and going-second power estimates
• Provisional: Meta Power is null (no dated metagame sample); Matchup fit (D13) is neutral; Tournament reliability relies on the text-only read
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates) Meta Power provisional without a dated sample usage_statistics missing_core flags Drastrius, Graflareio, Varudras, Break and Jupiter as absent although the deck runs them in the Extra Deck (copies 1-2); the in_this_deck flag appears to check only the Main Deck, so missing_core was not used as absence evidence No side deck in the export, so post-side plans cannot be measured