DoomZ Deck #765003 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

41 Main, 15 Extra, incl. DoomZ VII Seven - Elara x3, Jupredo the Shademachine Power Patron x3, Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring x3. Created Oct 13, 2026 by YGO Mod.

Deck DoomZ Master Duel

Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)

Created On: 10/13/2026

 
 


Official AI Deck Power Analysis
MidrangeConfidence: MediumEvaluated Oct 21, 2026
61± 6/ 100
Power Score
Structural 64
Reliability 58
Going First 62
Going Second 66

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 61/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

Overall score Value
Structural Deck Power 64
Going First 62
Going Second 66
Meta Power provisional
Tournament Reliability 58
  • Primary strategy: Midrange
  • Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
  • Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 41 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

  • Win condition: Xyz chains from DoomZ starters into DoomZ XII Drastrius, DoomZ Break and Jupiter, closing with large Xyz boards and direct attacks; Equip-based Xyz pressure with DoomZ Command and Vidolium/Plundered Power Patron Plane recursion
  • Turn 1 (going first): Open a DoomZ or Power Patron starter (Power Patron DoomZ, DoomZ Change, DoomZ V Five, Medius), search the next DoomZ piece, and Xyz Summon a DoomZ Xyz monster while holding a hand trap (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence) for the opponent's first response
  • Turn 2 (going second): Use the six-card hand's hand traps (Ash Blossom, Droll and Lock Bird, Maxx C, Infinite Impermanence) to break the opponent's first Summon, then rebuild the board through DoomZ Raiders and Change recursion
  • Recovery: Recover from the graveyard via DoomZ Change and DoomZ Raiders, and use DoomZ Break or Drastea to rebuild a board after a single removal
  • After siding: No side deck (Master Duel). Post-disruption adaptation depends on re-searching a DoomZ starter; no post-side plan is available to evaluate

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens a functional DoomZ or Power Patron starter: the archetype core is present in 18 of 25 standard core cards, and the hypergeometric estimate gives roughly 0.94 for at least one searcher-text card in a 5-card opening hand. Its score comes from the system: consistent starter access, eight hand traps and two 3-copy Xyz-enabling interruptions that protect the first Summon, and recursion through DoomZ Change and Raiders that keeps the plan alive after a disruption. Output is credible but not spectacular, since no recorded boards exist and the Xyz ceiling (Jupiter, Drastrius) relies on a few one-of Extra Deck pieces that are absent from the top core list. Popularity was not credited: archetype usage confirms the list is real, not that it is strong. Card scores were not averaged, and Meta Power is left provisional because no dated metagame sample exists.

Dimension scores

# Dimension Score Evidence
D1 Engine Accessibility & Consistency 74 P(at least one searcher-text card in opening 5) ≈ 0.94; DoomZ core copies 32 with ≈0.9998 hand-5 presence; 18/25 core cards present (Inferred)
D2 Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management 60 8 hand traps and 10 tech cards add some dead-card risk; Mulcharmy Fuwalos and Super Polymerization are conditional (Inferred)
D3 Combo Conversion & Ceiling 68 No recorded boards; ceiling inferred from Drastea removal text and Xyz chains to Jupiter 3500 ATK (Inferred)
D4 Combo Floor & Median Output 55 No recorded boards, so median output is text-only and conservative (Inferred)
D5 Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy 70 Searcher-text density (17) and recursion via Change and Raiders keep multiple lines alive after one removal (Inferred)
D6 Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind 68 Recursion from GY through Change and Raiders plus Maxx C draw supports a long grind (Inferred)
D7 End-Board & Interaction Quality 70 Infinite Impermanence, Forbidden Crown, Ash Blossom, Drastea removal text and 2 Xyz negates give layered interaction (Inferred semantic read; hand-trap flags verified)
D8 Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power 72 Going-second hand-trap density (Droll, Maxx C, Ash, Imperm) challenges an established board; split not measured (Inferred)
D9 Offensive Pressure & Closing Power 68 Closing via Jupiter 3500, Drastrius 2700 and direct/piercing text; no end-board data to confirm (Inferred)
D10 Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility 58 41 Main with 22 distinct cards; exact-name archetype purity 39.3% with generic and Power Patron support (Verified counts, Inferred read)
D11 Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage 62 15 Extra slots, 13 Xyz plus 2 Fusion; Varudras and Drastrius-style Xyz are partly absent from the core list (Verified counts, Inferred)
D12 Side Deck Adaptability 35 No side deck in Master Duel, so there is no post-side plan to evaluate; scored at a low baseline (Provisional)
D13 Matchup Coverage & Format Fit 50 No tournament link and no archetype meta-share in the export (Provisional)
D14 Pilotability & Error Tolerance 45 Multi-step Xyz chains and equip-tracking choices create many decision points (Inferred)

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 64, Going First ≈ 62, Going Second ≈ 66, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 58. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-1); weak post-side plan (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

  • Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.94 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
  • Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
  • Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

  • Consistent starter access: archetype core and searcher text cover nearly every opening hand
  • Layered interaction: 8 hand traps, Forbidden Crown, Infinite Impermanence and Xyz negates
  • Recursion through DoomZ Change and Raiders keeps lines alive after disruption
  • Strong Xyz ceiling with Jupiter 3500 ATK and Drastrius 2700 ATK

Weaknesses

  • No recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and median are text-only inferences
  • Low exact-name archetype purity (39%) with off-archetype and generic filler
  • Single-copy Extra Deck pieces (Varudras, Jupiter, Sargas) are missing from the core list
  • No side deck, so no post-disruption adaptation beyond re-searching

Critical choke points

  • Single Drastea removal or early hand-trap loss on the first Summon
  • Dependence on DoomZ Xyz monsters remaining in the Extra Deck
Priority Remove Add Reason
1 Mulcharmy Fuwalos (x2) A DoomZ-named starter or Xyz enabler Mulcharmy is off-archetype and low-impact; a DoomZ piece raises starter density and purity (Inferred)

Evidence & confidence

  • Verified: Main 41 and Extra 15 are within Master Duel size rules; All restricted cards are legal at the copies run; Archetype core presence 18/25 and purity 39.3%
  • Inferred: Opening-hand starter access ≈0.94; Interaction density and going-second value; Xyz ceiling from card text
  • Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit (no dated metagame sample or tournament link)
  • Data gaps: No combos supplied; floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry; going-first/second and brick rates are Inferred Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Guides are two short Vietnamese snippets without structured sections

More Master Duel Info

DoomZ

DoomZ Breakdown

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
https://metaduelist.com/
Top