DoomZ Deck #764861 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 60/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo, Toolbox
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz pressure from DoomZ and Power Patron Xyz monsters (Drastea 2400 ATK, Jupiter 3500 ATK, Vidolium 5000 ATK via Power Patron) converting a board the deck has already disrupted.; Equip-based Xyz chains (Amalthe, Seven - Elara, Power Patron DoomZ, DoomZ Destruction) that keep producing Xyz bodies from the Extra Deck.
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a searcher such as DoomZ Change, DoomZ Raiders or Jupredo to fetch a DoomZ or Power Patron starter, then go to a Level 4 or Level 8 Xyz line while holding Ash Blossom or Ghost Ogre for the opponent's first responses.
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre and Maxx C for the opponent's first activation, then use Drastea or Regulus to answer the first board and rebuild through DoomZ searchers and Mulcharmy draw.
• Recovery: Recover from the GY with Medius (GY banish-and-revive), DoomZ Change (GY add) and Raiders, then rebuild a Xyz from Level 4 DoomZ bodies.
• After siding: Not applicable: the deck runs no Side Deck in Master Duel, so there is no post-side plan to evaluate.

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a connected Midrange system, not as an average of its card scores. Its strongest reliable feature is access: with 18 searcher-text cards, P(at least one searcher in an opening 5) is about 0.96, so the DoomZ engine is usually reachable on turn 1 or 2. Interaction is layered (Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Maxx C, Regulus, Drastea, Destruction), which lifts the end-board and resilience dimensions. Conversion and median output could not be measured because no recorded boards exist, so those scores are text-based Inferred estimates held near the middle. Weaknesses are the 58% off-archetype spread across Power Patron, Mulcharmy, Change, Branded and Ecclesia cards, the low-synergy Extra Deck singletons, and the absence of a Side Deck. Archetype popularity and 100% inclusion of core cards earned no points, and no meta or tournament data was used.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 64.3, Going First ≈ 67, Going Second ≈ 63, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 60. Modifiers: engine_conflicts (-2); banlist_exposure (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers(-3) = 0.80*64.31 + 0.20*60 - 3 = 60.45 -> 60

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Reliable searcher access (P ≈ 0.96 of at least one searcher in hand, Inferred)
• Layered interaction: Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Maxx C, Regulus, Drastrius and Destruction
• Several high-ATK closers from the Extra Deck (Vidolium 5000, Jupiter 3500, Drastea 2400)
• Recursion from the GY (Medius, Change, Raiders) supports long rounds

Weaknesses

• Only 41.8% exact archetype purity; 32 off-archetype main copies blur the engine
• Extra Deck contains low-synergy singletons (Clockwork Knight, Number F0, Ecclesia, Albion, Sargas)
• No recorded boards, so conversion and median output are unmeasured
• No Side Deck, so no post-side plan

Critical choke points

• Turn-1 searcher or starter being hand-trapped by Ash Blossom or Ghost Ogre before the Xyz line is live
• Dependence on the Power Patron Xyz (Jupiter, Vidolium) lines for the highest-ceiling closes

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal under BanMasterDuel with 40 main / 15 extra / 0 side inside size rules; Maxx C is Limited at 1 copy and The Fallen & The Virtuous is Semi-Limited at 2 copies, both within limits; Main deck copy histogram: 7 three-copy, 5 two-copy, 9 one-copy cards; Extra Deck: 15 cards across 11 distinct entries, matching the cards list
• Observed: Core inclusion percentages from usage_statistics (archetype-level, not deck-level win data)
• Inferred: Starter access ≈ 0.34 (3-copy starter, going first) and ≈ 0.96 (searcher text group); Hand-trap probability ≈ 0.65 going second; Interaction density and endboard quality from card text; Conversion ceiling and median from text only (no boards)
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament_context); Side-deck adaptability (no Side Deck in this format list)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference (combos_evidence.total_combos = 0) No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates); those signals are Inferred Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Data conflict: usage_statistics marks DoomZ XIII Over - Graflareio, DoomZ Break - Diactorus, Jupiter, DoomZ XII End - Drastrius, Gigantic Sargas and Springans Merrymaker as in_this_deck=false, while the cards list runs them (2/2/2/2/1/1 copies). The cards list was treated as authoritative because its zone counts sum to 15 Extra Deck cards archetype_core_group proxy (P open = 1) is trivially saturated with 34 core copies and was not used No Side Deck in this list, so side adaptability is not evaluable