Tellarknight Deck #764180 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Xyz
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 53 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz boss from the Extra Deck (Constellar Ptolemy Omega7, Stellarknight Constellar Diamond, Constellar Pleiades) built off Tellarknight/Constellar Xyz materials; Hand-trap-protected Xyz beatdown with Tellarknight Altairan and Satellarknight Unukalhai as board pieces
• Turn 1 (going first): Open a Level 4 Constellar starter (Castor or Cygnian) and search a Tellarknight/Constellar monster or Spell, then Xyz Summon while protecting the engine with hand traps (theoretical, no combo data)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Ghost Belle, Droll and Dominus Purge to stop the opponent's first engine play, then rebuild from the Graveyard with Caduceus or Stellarnova Bonds (theoretical)
• Recovery: Use Constellar Caduceus and Tellarknight Cygnian searches plus Mulcharmy draw to refill hand after a broken opening
• After siding: Not applicable: the deck has no Side Deck, so no post-side plan exists

Why it scores here

The deck is Illegal in OCG: three Seventh Tachyon, three Ash Blossom, two Droll & Lock Bird and a Forbidden Triple Tactics Talent exceed their copy limits, so this is a theoretical, structural-only read capped low and not a normal Final score. Its strongest structural feature is end-board interaction: about 23 negation-text and 20 removal-text cards, 15 hand traps and several Quick Effect responses give it a high going-second board-breaking profile. The engine is a Tellarknight/Constellar Xyz chain whose starter density is modest (about 26% for any three-copy starter in a five-card opening hand, per the hypergeometric estimate), so consistency is middling, and no recorded boards were supplied, so the combo ceiling and median are text-only inferences. The score comes from consistency, interaction and going-second strength on the system, not from the archetype's popularity or from averaging card scores; there is no side deck and no meta sample, which holds back the resilience and matchup dimensions.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 55, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 62, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 42. Modifiers: banlist exposure (-12); illegal cap (-5). Final formula: Structural 55 (Combo profile) -> no meta: 0.80*55 + 0.20*42 = 52.4; modifiers -12 (banlist exposure) = 40; illegal cap applied: min(40, 35) = 35; theoretical structural-only

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.26 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense interaction: 15 hand traps, many negation and removal responses, strong going-second hand coverage
• Xyz finisher pool with 2700-ATK bosses and recursion via Caduceus and Stellarnova Bonds

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: copy-limit and Forbidden violations must be fixed before any legal play
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Dispersed engine: 64 off-archetype copies across several related families reduce coherence

Critical choke points

• Starter density: three-copy Level 4 starters give about a 26% chance of being in a five-card opening hand
• Hand-trap dependence: many hands hold only reactive cards and need a Constellar starter to convert

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Illegal, four copy-limit violations (Seventh Tachyon, Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Triple Tactics Talent); Main Deck 53 and Extra Deck 15 are within OCG size rules; Side Deck 0 is within 0-15; Card text and stats from the evidence pack (e.g. Ptolemy Omega7 2700 ATK); Composition: 28 distinct main, 14 distinct extra, archetype purity 5.9%
• Inferred: Starter probabilities (about 26% for a three-copy starter in hand5; about 66% for a searcher); Going-second hand-trap coverage ≈ 0.88; Structural and dimension scores; Functional roles and turn plans
• Provisional: Meta Power (null) and matchup fit (D13); Tournament reliability assumed from consistency and the missing side deck
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first/second, matchups or brick rate Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Usage-statistics inconsistency: 11 of the missing_core entries (e.g. Tellarknight Constellar Caduceus, Stellarknight Constellar Diamond, Constellar Pleiades, Exstellarknight Ptolemy Omega7, Tellarknight Ptolemaeus, Constellar Ptolemy M7, Stellarknight Delteros, Eclipse Twins, both Number F0, Tellarknight Constellar Delteros) are reported as not in this deck, yet the cards array lists them in the Extra Deck. core_present_pct (56) is therefore unreliable and was not used Deck title is null, so the deck is identified by id and archetype only