Constellar Deck #763872 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Control
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 5 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz Summon a large LIGHT/DARK Xyz (Ptolemy, Masquerade, Delteros, Number C104) from the Extra Deck and attack or destroy through the opponent's board.; Constellar/Tellarknight searchers and Caduceus-style recursion to rebuild the Xyz board over several turns.
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon a Constellar or Tellarknight starter (Castor, Cygnian, Lyran, Caduceus) to search a second engine piece, then Stellarnova Bonds or a Tellarknight Xyz to reach a 2500+ ATK Xyz.
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Ghost Ogre, Ghost Belle or Droll in hand to answer the opponent's first activation, then use the surviving engine pieces to Xyz on the next turn.
• Recovery: Rebuild from the GY and banishment using Tellarknight Constellar Caduceus, Umbral Horror recursion and Stellarnova Bonds' search.
• After siding: Not applicable as built: the list runs zero Side Deck cards, so there is no post-side plan.

Why it scores here

The deck's Structural score comes from the system as a whole: the Constellar/Tellarknight searchers give a 97.7% chance of at least one core-archetype card in the opening 5, and the Extra Deck of 14 distinct Xyz monsters gives broad coverage of end-board options. Interaction is the second strength, with 9 hand traps, 16 negation-text cards and 20 removal-text cards, which supports a 67.7% chance of at least one hand trap in a going-second 6-card hand. The weak points are the 25.7% exact-archetype purity, a wide spread across unrelated sub-archetypes, and the complete absence of a side deck, which together lower main-deck efficiency and post-side adaptability. Popularity did not earn points: Constellar is a core archetype in the usage stats, but that only confirms the list is real. Scores were not averaged from individual card values. Because the list breaks OCG copy limits (Seventh Tachyon, Ash Blossom, Droll, and two Forbidden cards), the Final score is capped and the evaluation is theoretical only.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 63, Going First ≈ 64, Going Second ≈ 65, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 50. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-6); No side deck (-4). Final formula: Unrounded: 0.80*Structural(62.8) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(50) + modifiers(-10) = 50.2; Illegal cap applied, so the reported score is 30 (theoretical / structural-only, not a normal Final).

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.98 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Core-archetype access is near-certain in the opening hand (97.7% for at least one core card in 5).
• Interaction density is high, with 9 hand traps and 16 negation-text cards.
• Extra Deck has broad end-board coverage across Constellar, Stellarknight and Masquerade Xyz monsters.

Weaknesses

• Illegal under OCG copy limits on five cards.
• No side deck.
• Only 25.7% exact-archetype purity, with many off-archetype generics.

Critical choke points

• Reliance on Seventh Tachyon and Droll and their Limited status
• Single hand trap dependency going second (67.7% for at least one in 6)
• Xyz chains that need a Level 4 or 5 material to start

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status and five copy-limit violations under OCG banlist (legality); Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 sizes; Card texts and stats for 14 Xyz monsters; Core inclusion rates from usage statistics (Constellar Castor 93%, Tellarknight Altairan 93%, Mulcharmy Fuwalos 93%)
• Inferred: Hypergeometric consistency (P>=1 core in 5 = 0.977; hand-trap group 0.677 going second); Dimension scores built from card text and composition; Brick and interaction reads from text
• Provisional: Meta Power (null); D13 matchup and format fit (50); Tournament reliability (50)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference. No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and pilot match record are absent. No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN. Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample. Deck title is null.