Odd-Eyes Deck #763591 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 38/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Stun
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 55 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Extra Deck Odd-Eyes Dragons (Rebellion Dragon Overlord, Raging Dragon, Absolute Dragon) built through Pendulum and Xyz/Link summons; Odd-Eyes Vortex Dragon and Link/Synchro Dragons for board pressure
• Turn 1 (going first): Set Pendulum scales with Performapal Skullcrobat Joker and Odd-Eyes Revolution Dragon, then convert into Extra Deck Dragons; hold Ash Blossom and Effect Veiler for the opponent's first activations
• Turn 2 (going second): Use a six-card hand to present hand traps (Infinite Impermanence, Ghost Ogre & Snow Rabbit, Effect Veiler) against the opponent's starter, then rebuild through Pendulum searchers
• Recovery: Pendulum searchers (Performapal Odd-Eyes Seer, Astrograph Sorcerer, Horoscope Sorcerer) and Pendulum recursion from the Graveyard rebuild the Pendulum Zones after disruption
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs no Side Deck, so there is no post-side plan

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens its Pendulum and Odd-Eyes starters, with about a 72% chance of at least one archetype-core card in a five-card opening hand (Inferred), and it has many ways to answer disruption through 14 hand traps and 24 negation-text cards. Its interaction is the strongest part of the system, and it is backed by the Extra Deck Dragons' 2800–3000 ATK for closing pressure. The score is held down by the illegal list: two Forbidden cards and two over-limit copies make the deck unplayable as built, so the evaluation is theoretical and structural only. No recorded boards exist, so combo floor and ceiling are text-only inference, and no side deck means no post-side plan. The score was reached by weighing consistency, interaction, and closing power on the whole system, not by averaging card scores or counting popularity.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary with Toolbox weighting, disclosed for context only; the structural score uses the Midrange profile. Structural ≈ 51, Going First ≈ 50, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 44. Modifiers: banlist_exposure (-8); engine_conflict_sprawl (-4). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) = 49.6, then context modifiers -12 = 38; illegal-list cap applied, theoretical/structural only

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.72 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense interaction: 14 hand traps and 24 negation-text cards
• Searcher density (26 cards) supports rebuilding after disruption
• Full Extra Deck with high-ATK Odd-Eyes Dragons for closing pressure

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: two Forbidden cards and two over-limit copies
• No side deck and no post-side plan
• Very low archetype purity; engine spread across sub-archetypes
• No recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and floor are unverified

Critical choke points

• Pendulum Zone setup: most engine lines need specific Pendulum scales to be live
• Dependence on Odd-Eyes core cards being present in the opening hand

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality status Illegal with four copy-limit violations (two Forbidden); Extra Deck composition 7 Link, 5 Xyz, 2 Synchro, 1 Fusion; Side Deck count 0; Exact-name purity 21.4%; 5 of 16 usage-core cards present
• Inferred: Opening-hand starter probability ≈ 0.72; Going-second hand-trap coverage ≈ 0.84; Interaction density and resilience estimates from card text
• Provisional: Meta Power and matchup fit (no dated metagame sample); Floor and median output (no recorded boards)
• Data gaps: No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot record absent No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Archetype spread contains a malformed value ('| supports_archetypes Power Patron'), which is a data-quality issue