Utopia Deck #763528 — Yu-Gi-Oh! OCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 30/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox, Xyz-engine
• Format: ocg

Legality

Main 56 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Xyz boss monsters from the Extra Deck (Number C104 Umbral Horror Masquerade, Masquerade V, Utopia Ray V, Number 39 Utopia Emissary) backed by 14 Xyz Monsters; Barian's Seventh Untopia and Umbral Horror searches feeding repeated Xyz Summons
• Turn 1 (going first): Search through Seventh Ascension, V Umbral Horror or Barian's Seventh Untopia, then go to a Masquerade or Number C Xyz line (Inferred from card text; no recorded combos)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Droll, Nibiru, Infinite Impermanence, Evenly Matched and Solemn Judgment to interrupt the opponent, then convert with Xyz or Fusion access (Inferred)
• Recovery: Rebuild through Umbral Horror and Mulcharmy draws, plus Gorgonic and Barian's searches (Inferred from text)
• After siding: None: the deck runs 0 side cards, so there is no post-side plan (Verified)

Why it scores here

The deck is Illegal: Ash Blossom & Joyous Spring is run 3 times against a limit of 2, and Droll & Lock Bird is run 2 times against a limit of 1. Under the rubric it does not get a normal Final Contextual score, so the 30 is a capped, theoretical, structural-only read. The structural read (about 50) rests on 14 hand traps, 17 searchers and 21 removal-text cards, which give roughly 85% odds of at least one searcher in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred). It is held back by a 1.4% exact-name archetype purity: the 70 off-archetype copies spread across Umbral Horror, Barian's, Mulcharmy, Seventh and Number, so the engine coherence is weak. There is no recorded combo data, so the floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference, and the deck has no side deck. The score comes from consistency, interaction and the Xyz boss ceiling on the system, not from averaging individual card scores or from archetype popularity.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 50, Going First ≈ 46, Going Second ≈ 54, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 42. Modifiers: Illegal copy-limit cap (-18); No side deck (0). Final formula: Uncapped 0.80*Structural(50) + 0.20*TournamentReliability(42) ≈ 48; Illegal cap applied to 30 (theoretical/structural-only, no normal Final Contextual score). Meta Power provisional.

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.85 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• 14 hand traps and 10 negation-text cards give strong going-second interaction
• 17 searchers make the opening hand likely to find an engine piece
• Xyz boss options at 2600–3000 ATK plus Extra Deck flexibility

Weaknesses

• Illegal copy counts (Ash Blossom 3/2, Droll 2/1)
• 1.4% exact-name archetype purity, so the engine is split across sub-archetypes
• Zero side deck, so no post-side plan
• Many spells and traps gated on specific sub-archetypes

Critical choke points

• The Extra Deck Xyz line needs a specific Umbral Horror, Number C, or Masquerade material, so a missing piece stalls the plan
• Solemn Judgment and Droll are Limited and fall to the same copy-limit check
• No side deck to adapt to a hate-heavy opponent

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: Ash Blossom x3 vs limit 2; Droll x2 vs limit 1; Main 56, Extra 15, Side 0, all within the OCG size rules; 14 hand traps, 17 searchers, 21 removal-text cards from role tags; Extra Deck: 14 Xyz, 1 Fusion; Exact-name archetype purity 1.4%
• Inferred: Consistency estimates (P ≥1 searcher 0.85; hand trap 0.84 going second); Going-first and going-second plans from card text; Interaction quality read from negation and removal text
• Provisional: Meta and matchup fit (D13) with no dated metagame sample; Tournament reliability
• Data gaps: No recorded combos: floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchup or brick rate Meta Power is provisional without a dated metagame sample Deck is Illegal, so the score is capped and theoretical