Power Patron Deck #763042 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 53/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Combo
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 41 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Pendulum-enabled Level 10 and Xyz/Link pressure (Jupiter/Nerva-style boards are absent here; the list leans on Vidolium 5000 ATK, DoomZ Drastrius/Graflareio, Accesscode Talker and Junoldo/Jupredo pendulum recursion); DoomZ Break/Graflareio Xyz chains through Power Patron DoomZ and DoomZ Raiders searches
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with a DoomZ or Power Patron starter (Change, Mulcharmy, Jupredo, Nervedo), search or summon an Xyz/Link enabler, then keep Ash Blossom and Maxx C up for the opponent's first Special Summon or activation
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand-trap first (Ash, Maxx C, Ghost Ogre, Impasto), then rebuild a board through Medius/Vandalism searches and Xyz extension from the Extra Deck
• Recovery: Recover from GY through Medius the Pure, DoomZ Change and Terminus searches, and Pendulum recursion via Junoldo and Jupredo
• After siding: Not applicable: Master Duel has no Side Deck in this export (side_count 0), so post-side adaptation is limited to Extra Deck and in-game choices

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens into its Power Patron/DoomZ core: the 21-copy archetype core has about a 98% chance of at least one card in a 5-card opening hand, though any single starter (3 copies) is only about 33% likely. Its interaction suite (5 hand traps, 9 negation-text cards, Ash Blossom, Maxx C, Ghost Ogre, Artmage Impasto) gives it reasonable end-board and going-second answers. Conversion is the weak point: no recorded boards exist, so ceiling and median are text-based inference and the median is held down by the low exact-archetype purity (16%) and the mix of DoomZ, Artmage and Power Patron engines. Popularity and archetype usage confirm the list is real and accessible but did not add points, and no card scores were averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 56.5, Going First ≈ 57, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 50. Modifiers: engine_conflict (-2); no_combo_evidence (0). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional; no dated metagame sample)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.33 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Archetype core is 21 copies and about 98% likely to appear in a 5-card opening hand
• Five hand traps and nine negation-text cards give layered interaction
• Extra Deck is well-stocked with Xyz/Link/Fusion options, including Vidolium and DoomZ Drastrius for closing

Weaknesses

• Exact-name archetype purity is only 16%; 47 off-archetype copies weaken engine coherence
• No recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and median cannot be verified
• Individual starters are 3-copy cards at about 33% in hand, so the engine depends on multi-card bootstraps

Critical choke points

• Starter access: a single 3-copy starter in hand is about 33% likely, so the opening relies on the archetype core rather than one named card
• Extra Deck dependence on Xyz and Link summons for most closing lines

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Legal, 41 Main / 15 Extra / 0 Side, no violations; Crossout Designator and Maxx C are Limited with 1 copy run, within limit; Archetype core group: 21 copies, about 0.98 chance of at least one in a 5-card opening hand; Exact-name archetype purity 16.1%
• Inferred: Starter-live probabilities and hand-trap coverage from hypergeometric estimates; Strategy classification as Combo with Stun/Toolbox secondaries; Pendulum/Xyz engine conflict modifier
• Provisional: Meta Power is null; tournament reliability and meta fit rely on no dated sample; Side Deck score is neutral because Master Duel has no Side Deck in this export
• Data gaps: no combos supplied (total_combos 0); combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry; going-first/second, matchup and brick rates are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied Master Duel export has no Side Deck, so D12 cannot use post-side data