Sinful Spoils Deck #762519 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±12 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo, Control
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 60 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 4 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Azamina and Mitsurugi Ritual/Fusion boards that convert through Saint Azamina, Moa Regina and Ame no Murakumo no Mitsurugi (Inferred from card text; no recorded boards); Diabellstar and Azamina recursion through WANTED and The Hallowed Azamina (Inferred)
• Turn 1 (going first): Open on Diabellstar or Mitsurugi starters, search via Mitsurugi/Azamina searchers, then Fusion or Ritual into a 3000+ ATK boss while holding Ash Blossom or Infinite Impermanence (Inferred)
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Droll and Lock Bird, Ash Blossom, Nibiru, Infinite Impermanence, Evenly Matched) to slow the opponent, then rebuild through Sinful Spoils recursion (Inferred)
• Recovery: WANTED and Deception of the Sinful Spoils recycle Spells from the GY; Azamina and Mitsurugi monsters return from GY (Inferred)
• After siding: Not evaluable: the deck runs 0 side cards, so no post-side plan exists

Why it scores here

The deck is scored as a system, not as an average of its card scores. Its consistency comes from a dense starter base (Diabellstar, Mitsurugi monsters and Azamina searchers) that is live in most opening hands (archetype core group P(open at least one in 5) about 0.93, Inferred). Interaction is the strongest part: 16 hand traps, Droll and Lock Bird, Ash Blossom, Nibiru and several negation spells give it good end-board and going-second control. Its closing power comes from 3000+ ATK Fusion, Ritual and Link bosses, and recursion through WANTED and Deception keeps it going after disruption. The deck is capped low because it is illegal: four cards exceed their copy limits and the list has no side deck, and no combo or tournament data exists, so the score is theoretical and structural only. Popularity of the archetype did not earn points.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Balanced. Structural ≈ 58, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 64, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: copy_limit_and_banlist_exposure (-12). Final formula: Structural 58 (Balanced). No metagame: 0.80*58 + 0.20*45 = 55.4; Illegal cap applied with banlist/copy-limit modifier of -12 and capped at 35 (theoretical/structural-only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.23 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense interaction package with 16 hand traps and multiple negation spells
• Archetype core is almost always present in opening hands (about 0.93)
• Multiple independent boss routes (Fusion, Ritual, Link) and GY recursion

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: four cards exceed copy limits and two are Limited
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptability
• Large off-archetype spread (71 copies) weakens engine coherence
• High pilot complexity across Ritual, Fusion and Azamina chains

Critical choke points

• Limited and Semi-Limited copy counts: legal build requires cutting 2 Ash Blossom, 1 Super Polymerization, 2 Mitsurugi Prayers and 2 WANTED
• Starter density around Diabellstar and Mitsurugi monsters for going-first access

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Deck is 60 main and 15 extra, within size rules; Four copy-limit violations and Limited/Semi-Limited statuses from legality; Archetype core composition and copy histogram from evidence
• Observed: Archetype spread and off-archetype counts from composition
• Inferred: Starter access and brick estimates from hypergeometric draws and card text; Interaction quality from card text; Going-first and going-second plans
• Provisional: Meta power and matchup fit (no dated metagame sample)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link; archetype meta-share and pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry; going-first/second and matchup signals are inferred no side deck; post-side evaluation impossible Meta Power provisional until a dated metagame sample is supplied