Blitzclique Deck #762370 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±8 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Stun, Toolbox
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 57 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Illegal. 1 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Thunder-chain board pressure from the Blitzclique monsters, closed by high-ATK Synchro and Fusion bosses (Chaos Angel, Psychic End Punisher, Albion, Mirrorjade, Rindbrumm) as the card text allows; theoretical, no recorded boards; Albaz Dragon fusion and Fallen of Albaz Extra Deck recursion, with the Ecclesia/Dogmatika Synchro package
• Turn 1 (going first): Open on Blitzclique searchers and removal-on-reveal (Surge, Grain, Crackle, Emi, Steppleader) to clear one target and Special Summon a Thunder monster, then extend into a Synchro or Fusion boss
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Solemn Warning and Solemn Judgment for the opponent's first Summon or search, then rebuild with Breakaway and Whisker Blitzclique
• Recovery: Breakaway, Blitzclique Return Stroke and Blitzclique Alternator recycle Thunder monsters from the GY and field; Pot of Prosperity and Droll add card flow
• After siding: Not evaluable: side_count is 0, so no post-side plan exists in the export

Why it scores here

This is a theoretical, structural-only read: the list is Illegal because The Fallen & The Virtuous is run 3 copies against a Semi-Limited limit of 2, so the final score is capped low and does not come from the normal formula. The structural profile reads Midrange with Stun and Toolbox support: the Blitzclique searchers and removal-on-reveal monsters, the Ash/Droll/Solemn hand-trap package, and the Synchro and Fusion bosses give a plausible interaction-heavy plan, with the archetype core present at about 99.9% in a five-card opening hand as a proxy (Inferred). Floor and median output are unmeasured because the export has no parseable boards, so the score rests on card text and probabilities, not on any recorded combo result. Archetype popularity and usage statistics confirm the list is real and accessible but add no power, and no card scores were averaged into the deck score. The deck runs no side deck, which removes any post-side plan and lowers Tournament Reliability.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 60.5, Going First ≈ 68, Going Second ≈ 66, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 52. Modifiers: illegal_list_cap (-17.8); no_side_deck (-3); banlist_exposure (-2); engine_split (-1). Final formula: No reliable metagame: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (-6) = 52.8, then capped at 35 because the list is Illegal (theoretical/structural-only)

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.9 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Dense interaction: 33 removal-text cards, 12 negation-text cards and 6 hand traps
• Searchers on 20 cards give high starter access (Inferred)
• Layered recovery through Breakaway, Return Stroke and Alternator

Weaknesses

• Illegal list: 3 copies of a Semi-Limited card
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Engine split across several archetypes (27.8% exact-name purity)
• No recorded boards to confirm the combo floor or ceiling

Critical choke points

• Thunder-monster count and the Breakaway/Return Stroke recycle loop
• Single-copy Synchro bosses (Chaos Angel, Psychic End Punisher, Three Champions) as the main closing pieces

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Illegal status: The Fallen & The Virtuous 3 copies vs 2 legal; Main 57, Extra 15, Side 0 counts and copy histogram; Banlist statuses of the restricted cards; Hypergeometric draw figures from the preprocessor
• Inferred: Starter access and brick estimates from probabilities and card text; Interaction density from text flags; Going-first and going-second strength reads
• Provisional: Meta Power and D13 matchup fit (no dated metagame sample)
• Data gaps: No parseable boards: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta share and pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry for going-first, going-second, matchups, brick or OTK rates Data inconsistency: usage_statistics marks Psychic End Punisher, Golden Cloud Beast, Albion the Branded Dragon and The Dragon that Devours the Dogma as in_this_deck=false, but the cards list includes them in the Extra Deck; the Extra Deck is taken as the cards list states Meta Power provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied No side deck in the export