Wyrms : Rush! Deck #762340 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 39/100 (±12 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Unclear (balanced profile; guide-claimed OTK unverified)
• Secondary strategies: OTK (guide claim only, unverified)
• Format: rush-duel-sevens

Legality

Main 37 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Unknown: 19 of 20 distinct cards are unresolved, so the finisher cannot be identified; guide snippets claim an OTK route through Maximum-type bosses and fusion-style plays (unverified); Unknown
• Turn 1 (going first): Unknown: no resolved starter or combo data
• Turn 2 (going second): Unknown: no hand-trap, negation or removal text detected
• Recovery: Unknown: no recursion or search text resolved (1 searcher-text card only)
• After siding: None: side deck is empty

Why it scores here

The deck is a legal 37-card main deck with no Extra or Side Deck, and it contains all 17 archetype-core cards from the usage statistics, so it is a real, accessible build. Its structure cannot be scored with confidence because 19 of 20 passcodes did not resolve to card text, and there are no recorded boards, so the floor, median and ceiling are all provisional. The evidence shows no hand traps, negation or removal text, and an empty side deck, which holds the interaction, resilience and post-side scores low. Popularity and the guide's Tier-1 claim did not earn points, and no card scores were averaged into the deck score. The final score is a low-confidence structural read that should be revised after re-export with resolved card names.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: balanced. Structural ≈ 41, Going First ≈ 38, Going Second ≈ 35, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: no side deck (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers = 0.80*41 + 0.20*40 - 2 ≈ 39

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ — · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• All 17 usage-core cards are present (100% core presence)
• Main deck size is within the 30–60 rule
• No illegal or over-limit cards detected

Weaknesses

• 19 of 20 distinct passcodes unresolved, so card text cannot be verified
• No hand traps, negation or removal text detected
• Empty side deck gives no post-side plan
• No recorded boards, so combo output is unmeasured

Critical choke points

• Starter identity unknown: no resolved text to identify which cards open the engine
• Single searcher-text card is the only detected search route

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main deck 37 cards within the 30–60 size rule; All 17 usage-core cards present; Copy histogram: 11×1, 1×2, 8×3
• Inferred: P(≥1 of a 3-copy card in a 5-card opening hand) ≈ 0.36 (hypergeometric); Brick and interaction estimates from role tags only
• Provisional: Meta position and Tier-1 claim from guide snippets; Combo floor, median and ceiling
• Data gaps: 19 of 20 distinct passcodes unresolved (name, type and text null) No recorded boards, so combo floor, median and ceiling are unmeasured No tournament link, so meta-share and match record are absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick and starter rates) Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied