Magnet Warrior Deck #762170 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 60/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 43 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Magnet Warrior Rock/EARTH board built from searcher chains (Magnet Bonding, Beta, Sigma Minus, Mulcharmy) into Tellusion, Block Dragon, Conduction Warrior Plasma Magnum or Thunder King-level bodies; Fiendsmith's Lacrima and Fiendsmith Link/Fusion lines recovered from the GY, with Naturia Beast and Baronne de Fleur as extra-deck board presence
• Turn 1 (going first): Turn 1 search via Beta, Sigma Minus or Bonding into a Level 4 Magnet Warrior, backed by Ash Blossom and Droll for disruption, then convert into a Fusion or Link board
• Turn 2 (going second): Hand traps (Ash x3, Droll x2, Maxx C, Ghost Belle, Effect Veiler, Nibiru) to break the opponent's opening, then Sigma Minus negation and a Magnet Warrior body to re-establish the board
• Recovery: Duoterion, Fiendsmith's Tract and Magnet Warrior GY-revive effects reload the searcher chain after a hand trap or removal interrupt
• After siding: No side deck is run (0 of 15 side slots used), so there is no evidenced post-side plan

Why it scores here

The deck scores as a connected system, not as an average of its card scores. Its archetype core is very reliable to open: the probability of at least one archetype-core card in a 5-card hand is about 0.998, and about 0.90 for at least one of its 15 searchers (Inferred). Its nine hand traps and Droll-style lock pieces give it good interruption resilience and a real going-second plan (P(≥1 hand trap in a 6-card hand) ≈ 0.78, Inferred). Conversion depends on several engines (Magnet, Fiendsmith, Adamancipator, Bonding) sharing a Rock/EARTH frame, which keeps the ceiling high but dilutes the average line, and no recorded boards exist to measure the median. Usage statistics confirm the list is real and accessible, but popularity did not earn points on its own, and the absence of a side deck and of any tournament or win-rate data keeps the score moderate.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary, Toolbox secondary (not applied as a separate blend; Midrange weights used). Structural ≈ 64.7, Going First ≈ 64, Going Second ≈ 66, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 62. Modifiers: No side deck (-2); Engine conflicts (-2); Compactness (0). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Very high archetype-core access in the opening hand
• Nine hand traps and two Droll copies give strong interruption and going-second disruption
• Multiple searchers (Bonding, Beta, Sigma Minus, Duoterion) enable repeatable T1 setups
• Extra Deck covers Link, Fusion, Xyz and Synchro lines

Weaknesses

• 1.7% exact-archetype purity: engines (Fiendsmith, Adamancipator, Naturia, Bonding) compete for the same slots
• No side deck, so no post-side adaptability
• No recorded boards, so the combo floor and median cannot be measured
• Several core engine pieces sit in the Extra Deck, so opening access to them depends on the Extra Deck being live

Critical choke points

• Magnet Bonding and Beta as the T1 searcher chain
• Sigma Minus negation as the main hand-side interaction after the opponent's hand traps

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal in master-duel with 43 main, 15 extra, 0 side; Copy limits satisfied (Crossout 1/1, Maxx C 1/1, Droll 2/2); Hand-trap count 9 and searcher text count 15 from card text tags; Extra Deck breakdown: 7 Link, 3 Fusion, 3 Xyz, 2 Synchro
• Observed: 26 usage-statistics rows; archetype-standard core is present in the list
• Inferred: Opening-hand probabilities for core and searcher access; Going-second hand-trap disruption estimate; Ceiling and median output inferred from card text, with no recorded boards
• Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament link)
• Data gaps: no combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference no tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry (going-first/second, matchup, brick/starter rates) exists in YGOVN Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Evidence inconsistency: usage statistics.missing core cards lists Flux Ochsenfeld, Conduction Warrior Plasma Magnum, I:P Masquerena, Gallant Granite, Baronne de Fleur, S:P Little Knight and Naturia Beast as absent, but the cards array lists all of them in the Extra Deck (zone extra). The core-presence count appears to check the Main Deck only; core presence is therefore understated and was not used as a penalty. No side deck list supplied (0 side cards) deck title is null