Magnet Warrior Deck #759377 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 56/100 (±6 · Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Toolbox, Stun
• Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 60 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Magnet Warrior and Gem-Knight boss monsters (Zirconia, Block Dragon, Tellusion, Nibiru) attacking through a field the deck controls with Magnet Warrior and Magnet Bonding search lines; Extra Deck Link and Fusion finishers (Conduction Warrior Plasma Magnum, Gem-Knight Phantom Quartz) once the board is stable
• Turn 1 (going first): Open with Magnet Bonding or Duoterion to search a Magnet Warrior, Normal Summon Sigma Minus or Beta, then reach a Magnet Warrior or Gem-Knight Fusion line while holding hand traps (Ash Blossom, Infinite Impermanence, Ghost Ogre) for the opponent's first interaction
• Turn 2 (going second): Hold a hand trap (Ash Blossom, Droll & Lock Bird, Maxx C, Effect Veiler) to answer the opponent's starter, then rebuild through a searcher such as Gem-Armadillo or Gem-Knight Nepyrim on the next turn
• Recovery: Recycle through the graveyard with Magnet Warrior and Gem-Knight GY effects (Gem-Knight Fusion, Magnet Warrior Omega Plus) and rebuild the Extra Deck line from searchers
• After siding: No side deck is registered, so no post-side plan is available; the deck relies on its main-deck hand traps for every matchup

Why it scores here

The deck reliably opens its engine: the archetype core group has about a 97 percent chance of at least one card in a 5-card opening hand (Inferred from hypergeometric estimates), and 22 searcher-text cards give about a 91 percent chance of at least one searcher in hand. Redundant hand traps (14 cards, about 81 percent chance of one in a going-second 6-card hand) and several independent engines (Magnet Warrior, Gem-Knight, Mulcharmy, Bonding) keep the deck functional after a single disruption. Its ceiling is a Magnet Warrior or Gem-Knight boss line, but no recorded boards exist, so the combo floor, median, and conversion scores are text-based estimates only. Popularity of the archetype did not add points, and the score was built from the deck's system properties rather than from averaging individual card scores. The main deficits are the missing side deck, the fragmented sub-archetype composition, and the lack of any tournament or win-rate data, which keeps meta fit provisional.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange. Structural ≈ 62, Going First ≈ 64, Going Second ≈ 58, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 58. Modifiers: No side deck (-2); Sub-archetype fragmentation (-2); Limited-card exposure (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); 0.80*62.1 + 0.20*58 = 61.3, then -5 modifiers = 56.3, rounded to 56

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.97 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0.03 (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Redundant searchers and multiple independent engines (Magnet Warrior, Gem-Knight, Mulcharmy, Bonding)
• Fourteen hand traps give layered going-second interaction
• Boss monsters with 2500 to 3000 ATK provide closing power

Weaknesses

• No side deck, so no post-side adaptation
• Fragmented sub-archetype composition with 74 off-archetype copies
• Sixty-card main deck with 19 tech slots reduces compactness
• No recorded combos or win-rate telemetry to confirm the ceiling

Critical choke points

• Magnet Bonding and Duoterion are the main searchers; losing both to hand traps leaves the Magnet Warrior line dependent on Sigma Minus and Beta
• Limited and Semi-Limited hand traps (Maxx C, Crossout Designator, Droll & Lock Bird) are single-point interaction in many lines

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legal in master-duel with 60 main, 15 extra and 0 side cards; Maxx C and Crossout Designator are Limited at 1 copy each; Droll & Lock Bird is Semi-Limited at 2 copies; Card stats and text as listed in evidence (e.g. Block Dragon 2500/3000, Tellusion 2500/2500); Archetype core usage stats show 100 percent inclusion for several Magnet Warrior core cards
• Observed: Archetype usage stats show Magnet Warrior core cards are standard for this archetype
• Inferred: Opening-hand consistency about 0.97 for the archetype core group (hypergeometric estimate); Hand-trap coverage about 0.81 for a going-second 6-card hand; Structural and going-first and going-second estimates built from the rubric dimensions; Ceiling and median estimates based on text, not recorded boards
• Provisional: Meta power and matchup fit, since no dated metagame sample or tournament link is available
• Data gaps: No combos supplied, so combo floor, median and ceiling are text-based inference No tournament link, so archetype meta-share and per-pilot record are absent No win-rate telemetry (going-first or going-second split, matchup, brick or starter rates) Meta power is provisional without a dated metagame sample No side deck, so post-side performance cannot be assessed