Blue-Eyes Deck #757126 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 35/100 (±10 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo, Toolbox
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 60 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status under the rules at evaluation time: Illegal. 2 violation(s).

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Blue-Eyes White Dragon and Blue-Eyes extenders (Ultimate Dragon, Tyrant Dragon, Chaos MAX via Chaos Form) converting a searched BEWD engine into 3000 to 4500 ATK boards; Blue-Eyes Ultimate Spirit Dragon and Blue-Eyes Spirit Dragon as Synchro pressure with negation support
• Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Sage or Maiden of White, search a Tuner or BEWD via The White Stone of Legend, Wishes, or Melody, then extend into Blue-Eyes Alternative or Ultimate Dragon (Inferred from text; no recorded boards)
• Turn 2 (going second): Open hand traps (Ash, Droll, Effect Veiler, Infinite Impermanence, Nibiru) to blank the opponent's starter, then rebuild through the searchers (Inferred)
• Recovery: Searchers and GY-based extenders (Kaibaman, Dragon Spirit of White, Deep-Eyes) rebuild BEWD after a broken opening (Inferred)
• After siding: Not assessable: the export has zero side-deck cards, so no post-side plan exists

Why it scores here

This deck is illegal in TCG as built (Ash Blossom at 3 copies and Droll and Lock Bird at 2 copies exceed their limits), so the normal Final formula is suspended and the 35 is a capped structural-only read; the pre-cap value of about 45 is shown in the modifiers and is not the published score. Structurally it opens functional Blue-Eyes lines through several 3-copy searchers and a large Blue-Eyes core, which earns the engine accessibility and closing-power dimensions. Interaction density (hand traps, negation text, and Blue-Eyes Spirit and Ultimate Spirit negation) earns the endboard score, while the 14 hand traps and 14 tech cards also add brick and dead-card risk to D2. No recorded boards exist, so combo ceiling and floor are text-only Inferred estimates, and no popularity or meta-share was counted toward the score. The deck has no Side Deck, which caps side adaptability at a very low score and reduces tournament reliability.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Midrange primary with Combo ratio applied to D1 and D5 only, not a formal blend. Structural ≈ 59, Going First ≈ 60, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 48. Modifiers: Banlist exposure (-8); No side deck (-4). Final formula: Illegal list: normal Final formula suspended; Structural 59 and TR 48 give 0.80*59 + 0.20*48 = 57, with modifiers total -12 to about 45, then capped at 35 as a structural-only result for an illegal list

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.23 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Large Blue-Eyes core (23 copies) with redundant searchers gives high opening access to the engine
• Layered interaction: 14 hand traps plus negation and removal text across the Main and Extra decks
• High closing ceiling through 4000 to 4500 ATK extenders and double-piercing or multi-attack text

Weaknesses

• Illegal as built: copy limits exceeded on two cards
• No side deck at all, so no post-side plan
• 44% exact-name purity and 14 tech cards dilute the engine and raise brick risk
• No recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and median are unverified

Critical choke points

• Blue-Eyes White Dragon on the field or in the hand is the central choke point for most extenders
• Hand-trap timing for Ash and Droll is a single-turn dependency that does not recover if the hand is broken

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Legality: Ash Blossom 3 copies vs legal 2 (Semi-Limited); Droll and Lock Bird 2 copies vs legal 1 (Limited); Main 60 and Extra 15 meet TCG size rules; Side is 0; Archetype purity 44% exact-name; 42 off-archetype copies; Copy histogram 1x10, 2x7, 3x12 matches the list
• Inferred: Starter reliability and brick estimates from hypergeometric probabilities and card text; Ceiling read from card text (Chaos MAX, Ultimate Dragon); Interaction density from negation and removal text; Going-first and going-second plans from card text
• Provisional: Meta power and format fit (no dated meta sample); Tournament reliability
• Data gaps: No combos supplied: combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link: archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry: going-first, going-second, matchup, brick and OTK rates are Inferred or Unknown Side Deck is empty, so side adaptability cannot be scored Illegal copy counts make the probability table an upper bound