Cyber Dragon Deck #756570 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Duel

Download YDK

Download EDO

Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)

Created On: 09/26/2026

Official AI Deck Power Analysis

ComboConfidence: Medium

53± 8/ 100

Power Score

Structural 57

Reliability 50

Going First 58

Going Second 55

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 53/100 (±8 · Confidence: Medium)

Overall score	Value
Structural Deck Power	57
Going First	58
Going Second	55
Meta Power	provisional
Tournament Reliability	50

Primary strategy: Combo
Secondary strategies: Tempo, Toolbox
Format: master-duel

Legality

Main 40 / Extra 15 / Side 0 — status: Legal.

Identity & game plan

Win condition: Cyber Dragon Infinity, Superdreadnought Rail Cannon Gustav Rocket and Cyber End Dragon attacking after a Machine-focused Fusion, Xyz or Link board is built; Cyber Dragon Nova and Chimeratech Rampage Dragon pressure with Power Bond or Future Fusion Nova boosts
Turn 1 (going first): Normal Summon Cyber Dragon Core to add a Cyber Spell/Trap (Cyber Emergency or Cyberdark Realm), then use Cyber Dragon or Cyber Dragon Nachster to bridge into a Link or Xyz line
Turn 2 (going second): Hold Ash Blossom and Droll and Lock Bird or Maxx C for the opponent's first search or summon, then rebuild with Cyber Dragon and Core
Recovery: Revive Cyber Dragon Nachster and Cyber Dragon Core from the GY, and use Cyberdark Claw or Cyberdark Wurm to rebuild the Cyber Dragon count
After siding: Not applicable: Master Duel has no side deck (side_count 0), so no post-side plan exists

Why it scores here

The deck's consistency rests on a dense searcher layer (about 98 percent chance of at least one searcher in an opening five-card hand, Inferred) and three copies each of Cyber Dragon Core, Cyber Emergency and Cyberdark Realm, which keep the first turns moving. Interaction is above average for a non-control engine: Ash Blossom, Droll and Lock Bird, Maxx C, Crossout Designator, Cybernetic Overflow and Regulus together cover hand traps, negation and removal. Closing power comes from high-ATK Machine boss monsters in the Extra Deck, but the engine is split across Cyber Dragon, Cyberdark, Train, Infinitrack, Sky Striker and Kashtira pieces, which lowers the odds of a clean line on every hand. Popularity and archetype usage stats confirm the list is real and accessible but did not earn points; the score is built from the system (consistency, interaction, closing) and was not averaged from card scores. No combo boards, win-rate telemetry or tournament data exist for this deck, so combo and matchup dimensions stay Inferred or Provisional.

Dimension scores

#	Dimension	Score	Evidence
D1	Engine Accessibility & Consistency	62	P(at least one Cyber Dragon Core in a 5-card opening hand) ≈ 0.34 with 3 copies; searcher-text group ≈ 0.98; bootstrap via Core, Emergency and Realm (Inferred)
D2	Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management	48	Four sub-archetypes plus generic staples in 40 cards; only 27.3 percent exact-name Cyber Dragon purity; Cyberdark Realm and Claw need Cyberdark monsters (Inferred)
D3	Combo Conversion & Ceiling	65	Guides describe a strong OTK ceiling with Machine-based Fusion and Link lines, but no recorded boards exist to measure it (Inferred semantic read)
D4	Combo Floor & Median Output	45	No recorded boards, so median output is unmeasured; scored near the midpoint with a wide band (Inferred, data gap)
D5	Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy	60	Six hand-trap-type cards plus recursion from Nachster, Core banish and Herz give several independent restart paths (Inferred)
D6	Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind	58	Cyberdark Claw, Mulcharmy Fuwalos and Cyberdark Wurm generate card flow, but Power Bond costs life and the engine spends many GY resources (Inferred)
D7	End-Board & Interaction Quality	70	Interaction density is high: Ash x3, Droll x2, Maxx C, Crossout Designator, Cybernetic Overflow, Regulus and Heosvarog negation/removal text (Inferred semantic read on verified card text)
D8	Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power	60	Two-card hand-trap cover (Droll x2, Ash x3) and Cybernetic Overflow banish-destroy give going-second answers, but the split is unmeasured (Inferred)
D9	Offensive Pressure & Closing Power	70	Cyber Dragon Infinity (2100 base, gains ATK per material), Gustav Rocket (5000 ATK) and Cyber End Dragon (4000 ATK) provide closing power (verified stats)
D10	Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility	50	Main is 40 of 40 slots with 25 distinct cards; off-archetype staples (Polymerization, Power Bond, Crossout, Clockwork Night, Outrigger Extension) reduce compactness (Inferred)
D11	Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage	45	15 of 15 Extra slots used across Fusion, Xyz and Link from four sub-archetypes; several Extra pieces (Azalea, Arise-Heart, Gustav Max) are not core to the Cyber Dragon engine (Inferred)
D12	Side Deck Adaptability	25	Master Duel has no side deck and this list runs 0 side cards, so no adaptability is possible (verified legality, Inferred scoring)
D13	Matchup Coverage & Format Fit	45	No tournament link or dated meta sample; archetype guides describe the deck as not strong enough for the current meta (archetype context, Provisional)
D14	Pilotability & Error Tolerance	40	Multiple Quick Effect windows and multi-step Fusion, Xyz and Link sequences create many decision points (Inferred)

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Combo. Structural ≈ 57, Going First ≈ 58, Going Second ≈ 55, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 50. Modifiers: No side deck in Master Duel (-2); Engine fragmentation across four sub-archetypes (-1). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability + ContextModifiers (Meta provisional)

Probability & combo summary

Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.34 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

Dense searcher layer (about 98 percent to find a searcher in an opening five)
Strong interaction suite across hand traps, negation and removal
High-ATK Extra Deck closers with verified stats

Weaknesses

Four sub-archetypes diluted to 27.3 percent exact-name purity
Engine conflicts between Cyberdark and Cyber Dragon pieces
Several Extra Deck cards outside the core engine

Critical choke points

Cyber Dragon Core is the main starter at 3 copies (about 34 percent to open one)
Machine-based Fusion or Link material requirement for the closers

Recommended changes

Priority	Remove	Add	Reason
1	Mulcharmy Fuwalos (1 copy)	Cyber Dragon (3rd copy)	Fuwalos needs an empty field to act; a third Cyber Dragon raises the main-line Machine material count and bridge access
2	Crossout Designator (1 copy)	Cyber Emergency or Cyber Dragon Herz (already at 3 and 1; consider a 2nd Herz only if a Cyber Dragon count is confirmed)	Reduces the off-archetype slot count and raises engine density; this is a judgement call, not a verified gap

Evidence & confidence

Verified: Main deck 40, Extra 15, Side 0 (Master Duel size rules 40-60 / 0-15 / 0-15); Restricted cards Maxx C (Limited, 1 run), Crossout Designator (Limited, 1 run) and Droll and Lock Bird (Semi-Limited, 2 run) are within legal limits; Card stats and text excerpts for all listed cards; Exact-name purity 27.3 percent
Observed: Usage statistics show the core Cyber Dragon list is archetype-standard (16 of 25 core cards present)
Inferred: Opening-hand probabilities (hypergeometric, Main Deck only); Interaction density and going-second answers from card text; Consistency, brick and resilience reads
Provisional: Meta Power (no dated metagame sample); Matchup and format fit (no tournament data; archetype guides only)
Data gaps: no combos supplied — combo floor/median/ceiling is text-only inference no tournament link — archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent no win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN (going-first/second, matchup, game-level, brick/starter/OTK rates) — those signals are Inferred or Unknown Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied

Show More Show Less

More Master Duel Info

Cyber Dragon Breakdown