Psychics: Rush! Deck #754590 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens
38 Main, incl. Ama Lilith x3, CAN:D x3, CAN:D LIVE x3 - Skill: Climax Omega. Created Sep 24, 2026 by YGO Mod.
Deck Psychics: Rush! Rush Duel Sevens
Created by: YGO Mod (20517634)
Created On: 09/24/2026
Climax Omega
Main Deck (38)
- Ama Lilith x3
- Amabear Lilith x1
- CAN:D x3
- CAN:D ALL x1
- CAN:D LIVE x3
- Ice Pop Bear x1
- Maginical Miracle x1
- Omega Guitarna the Shining Megastar x2
- Prima Guitarna the Shining Superstar x2
- Princess Omega the Shining Megastar x1
- Psypickupper x3
- Silent Assailant x3
- Fusion x2
- JAM:P Check! x2
- Pot of Greed x1
- Psychic Divergence x2
- Star Restart x3
- Shiny Shady x3
- Trap Hole x1
Couldn't load the deck
Deck — Deck Power Evaluation
Final Contextual Deck Power: 48/100 (±12 · Confidence: Low)
| Overall score | Value |
|---|---|
| Structural Deck Power | 52 |
| Going First | 46 |
| Going Second | 38 |
| Meta Power | provisional |
| Tournament Reliability | 45 |
- Primary strategy: Combo
- Secondary strategies: Blind-Second/OTK
- Format: rush-duel-sevens
Legality
Main 38 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.
Identity & game plan
- Win condition: One-turn OTK through a Fusion-style board built from the archetype core, as described in the guides (Inferred from guide text; no recorded boards); Gradual LP-inflation stall described in the guides (Inferred)
- Turn 1 (going first): Open on a core starter from the 3-copy core cards (about 0.35 per single 3-copy card in a 5-card hand, Inferred), extend, and build toward the OTK turn
- Turn 2 (going second): Six-card hand with a core starter; no hand traps or tech cards present, so the plan depends on converting on the next turn (Inferred)
- Recovery: Redundant core copies (29 archetype-core copies, group P(at least one in hand5) ≈ 0.9997, Inferred) provide rebuild routes, but card identities are unresolved, so route quality cannot be checked
- After siding: Not evaluable: the deck has no side deck (side_count 0)
Why it scores here
The deck's consistency is estimated from the Main Deck alone: 29 archetype-core copies give a near-certain chance (about 0.9997) that at least one is in an opening hand, and 15 of the 19 usage-stat core cards are present. Those numbers are Inferred, because all 19 passcodes failed to resolve, so the card identities, types and effects are unknown. The ceiling (D3, D9) follows the Vietnamese guides' description of a one-turn OTK with large LP gain, but no recorded boards exist to confirm it, and the guides also say the deck is inconsistent and hard to pilot. The median (D4) and interaction (D7) are scored low because the list has no hand traps, floodgates or tech cards and no combo data. No meta or tournament data was supplied, so Meta Power is null and the Final score rests on the Structural score plus Tournament Reliability. The score comes from consistency and the system's conversion potential, not from the archetype's popularity or from averaging card scores.
Dimension scores
| # | Dimension | Score | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Engine Accessibility & Consistency | 62 | Core-group P(≥1 in hand5) ≈ 0.9997 across 29 copies; single 3-copy cards ≈ 0.35 each; card identities unresolved (Inferred) |
| D2 | Opening-Hand Quality & Brick Management | 58 | Brick proxy from core-group draw odds ≈ 0.0003 full-miss; no conflict data available (Inferred) |
| D3 | Combo Conversion & Ceiling | 60 | Ceiling taken from guide text claiming one-turn OTK; no recorded boards to measure (Inferred from guide) |
| D4 | Combo Floor & Median Output | 45 | No parseable combos, so floor and median are unmeasured and scored conservatively (Provisional) |
| D5 | Interruption Resilience & Route Redundancy | 45 | Zero hand traps or tech cards, and no independent second line verified (Inferred) |
| D6 | Resource Economy, Recovery & Grind | 50 | Guides describe LP spend as the resource cost of the engine; no resource or recursion data (Inferred from guide) |
| D7 | End-Board & Interaction Quality | 35 | role_tag_counts all 0; no negation or removal text verified (Verified count, Inferred quality) |
| D8 | Going-Second & Board-Breaking Power | 40 | No hand traps, floodgates or removal on the going-second side (Inferred) |
| D9 | Offensive Pressure & Closing Power | 70 | Guide describes OTK-level closing power; no end-board or ATK data (Inferred from guide) |
| D10 | Main Deck Efficiency & Flexibility | 65 | 38 Main, 19 distinct, copy histogram 7/5/7 across 1-3 copies; legal size range (Verified count, Inferred efficiency) |
| D11 | Extra Deck Efficiency & Coverage | 50 | No Extra Deck in this format and none in the list; neutral score (Verified) |
| D12 | Side Deck Adaptability | 20 | No side deck (side_count 0), so no post-side adaptability (Verified) |
| D13 | Matchup Coverage & Format Fit | 50 | No tournament or meta data; archetype share unavailable (Provisional) |
| D14 | Pilotability & Error Tolerance | 35 | Guides say the deck is hard for newcomers and easy to misplay into a turn-after OTK; step count unknown (Inferred from guide) |
How the score was computed
Strategy profile: Combo profile as primary; secondary strategy noted but not blended. Structural ≈ 52, Going First ≈ 46, Going Second ≈ 38, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 45. Modifiers: No side deck (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional); Structural 51.6, TR 45, pre-modifier 50.2, final 48 after modifiers
Probability & combo summary
- Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 1 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ 0 (all Inferred)
- Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
- Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines
Strengths
- Core group is very likely to appear in opening hands (Inferred)
- Guides describe OTK and LP-gain closing power (Inferred from guide text)
- Legal size and copy limits with no restricted cards (Verified)
Weaknesses
- All 19 distinct passcodes are unresolved, so card roles cannot be checked (Verified gap)
- No interaction, hand traps or floodgates (Verified count)
- No side deck (Verified)
- No recorded boards, so the combo ceiling and median are unmeasured (Verified gap)
- Guides describe it as hard to pilot and prone to LP-related self-KO (Inferred)
Critical choke points
- Card identities unresolved, so whether the core is a single-card or multi-card gate is unknown
- Going-second answer to an established board is absent
Recommended changes
| Priority | Remove | Add | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unverified passcodes | Resolve the 19 unresolved passcodes (names, types, effects) and re-run evaluation | Without card identities, the role, consistency and ceiling scores are all Low-confidence estimates |
| 2 | Empty side deck | Add 3-6 side cards for the most common disruption in the format | A side deck gives a post-side plan that the current list lacks |
| 3 | No interaction slots | Add 1-2 hand traps or negates if the format allows them | Interaction density is near zero, which weakens the going-second score |
Evidence & confidence
- Verified: Legal size range 30–60 Main, 0 Extra, 0 Side; No banned or limited cards (restricted_cards empty); No side deck; 19 passcodes unresolved; No combo, tournament or meta data supplied
- Inferred: Core-group consistency ≈ 0.9997 from the hypergeometric proxy; Going-first and going-second plans; One-turn OTK ceiling and LP-based stall from guide text; Interaction and pilotability scores
- Provisional: Meta Power (null); Matchup fit (D13)
- Data gaps: All 19 passcodes unresolved to names or card text; no card roles can be confirmed No combos supplied, so floor, median and ceiling are text-only No tournament link, so meta-share and per-pilot records are absent No win-rate telemetry exists in YGOVN Meta Power is Provisional without a dated metagame sample Legality status is 'Legal with warning' but no size_warnings or violations were supplied to explain it Guide text calls the deck Fusion-based while the Extra Deck is empty; the relationship is unclear
Couldn't load the combos










