Wyrms : Rush! Deck #754208 — Yu-Gi-Oh! Rush Duel Sevens

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 40/100 (±12 · Confidence: Low)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Combo
• Format: rush-duel-sevens

Legality

Main 38 / Extra 0 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Unverified. The archetype's Vietnamese guides describe a Maximum-monster plus piercing/direct-damage OTK plan; no recorded boards confirm it.; None identified from the resolved list. Only 2 of 18 distinct cards are resolved, and both are Skill Cards.
• Turn 1 (going first): Unverified. Opening 5 has about a 35% chance of containing any given 3-copy card, so no single starter is reliable on turn 1.
• Turn 2 (going second): Unverified. The deck has no hand traps, negations or removal by text, so going second relies on a board the deck has not been shown to build.
• Recovery: Unverified. No recursion or float text was resolved from the card data.
• After siding: None. The Side Deck is empty (0 cards).

Why it scores here

The list is legal on copy limits and size, but 16 of its 18 distinct passcodes resolve to no card name or text, so the score rests mainly on the copy histogram, draw probabilities and the usage table. Consistency is limited: a 3-copy card has about a 35% chance of appearing in a 5-card opening hand, and the deck runs only 9 of the 19 archetype core cards in the usage statistics (47%), with 10 high-inclusion core cards absent. No recorded combos exist, so ceiling and median output are unmeasured and the archetype guides' OTK claims are not credited. Interaction is the weakest area: no hand traps, negations or removal were identified, and the Side Deck is empty. Popularity and the guides' Tier-1 wording earned no points, and no card scores were averaged into the deck score.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Strategy profile: Balanced (default; the strategy is unclear without combo data). Structural ≈ 42, Going First ≈ 40, Going Second ≈ 35, Meta = provisional, Tournament Reliability ≈ 40. Modifiers: Empty Side Deck (-2). Final formula: 0.80*Structural + 0.20*TournamentReliability (Meta provisional) + ContextModifiers = 0.80*42 + 0.20*40 - 2 = 39.6, rounded to 40

Probability & combo summary

• Opening a starter: P(≥1) ≈ 0.35 · key two-card combo ≈ — · full-brick estimate ≈ — (all Inferred)
• Combo output: best PowerIndex —, median —, board-per-starter —
• Turn order: 0 going-first lines vs 0 going-second lines

Strengths

• Legal size (38 cards) and copy limits; every distinct passcode that could be checked is Unlimited
• Nine different cards at 3 copies gives redundancy across several cards, if they prove to be engine pieces
• Archetype-matched list: 9 of 19 usage-core cards present, including the 100%-inclusion core cards
• Main Deck size within the format's range for flexibility

Weaknesses

• 16 of 18 distinct passcodes resolve to no name or text, so the list cannot be checked against card text
• No hand traps, negations or removal detected
• Empty Side Deck gives no post-side plan
• 10 high-inclusion usage-core cards absent (60-80% inclusion)
• No recorded combos, so ceiling and median output are unmeasured

Critical choke points

• Any single 3-copy card reaches opening hand only about 35% of the time going first
• Going second, no identified interaction is available to answer an established board

Recommended changes

Evidence & confidence

• Verified: Main deck size 38 is within the 30-60 rule for rush-duel-sevens; All 18 distinct passcodes that could be checked are Unlimited with 3 legal copies; No Extra or Side Deck cards are present; 9 of 19 usage-core cards are in the deck (47.4%)
• Inferred: Opening-hand probabilities for each card copy count (hypergeometric, Main Deck only); No hand traps or negation or removal present, from role flags and text checks; Consistency and brick estimates from copy histogram only
• Provisional: Meta-share and format fit (no dated meta sample; tournament context absent); Ceiling and median output (no combo boards)
• Data gaps: 16 of 18 distinct passcodes are unresolved (name, type and text all null), so card-level text checks are incomplete The export labels the deck 'Legal with warning', but size_warnings and violations are both empty, so the reason for the warning is not given No combos supplied; combo floor, median and ceiling are text-only inference No tournament link; archetype meta-share and per-pilot match record absent No win-rate telemetry for the format Meta Power is Provisional unless a dated metagame sample is supplied The archetype_core_group probability (0.9913) conflicts with archetype_purity (0 exact-name matches) and was not relied on Side Deck is empty, so post-side behavior is not evaluable