forbidden Deck #736237 — Yu-Gi-Oh! TCG

Deck — Deck Power Evaluation

Final Contextual Deck Power: 58/100 (Confidence: Medium)

• Primary strategy: Midrange
• Secondary strategies: Control, Fusion Toolbox
• Format: tcg

Legality

Main 56 / Extra 14 / Side 0 — status: Legal with warning.

Identity & game plan

• Win condition: Fusion Sumon Invoked Fusion Monsters to build interactive boards and convert advantage over multiple turns; Grind through disruption with multiple Aleister vectors and Fusion recursion; close via Fusion Monster beats
• Turn 1 (going first): Establish Magicaleltdown lock + one-two Invoked Fusion Monsters (Mechaba/Elysium) with negation/removal; protect with hand traps and Solemn Warning
• Turn 2 (going second): Use Ash/Ghost Belle/hand traps to disrupt opponent's setup; deploy Forbidden Droplet and Lightning Storm for board clear; establish Fusion foothold with Super Polymerization or Invocation
• Recovery: Aleister recursion vectors (Reminiscent, Gamma Sumon, Aiwass, Baybaron) enable repeated Fusion access after one interrupt; Magical Meltdown searchable via Terraforming reduces reliance on hand
• After siding: No side deck; rely on maindeck flexibility. Core plan unchanged post-game except opponent preps for Invoked sequencing

Why it scores here

This Invoked-hybrid deck reliably opens a Fusion engine via9 core Aleister vectors at P(≥1) ≈ 60%, supported by strong hand-trap density (13 copies, P≈ 81% going-second). The median board assembles one-to-two Fusion Monsters with negate/removal, bolstered by Magical Meltdown's protected search and Forbidden Droplet/Lightning Storm interaction. Recovery depth is solid—multiple Aleister recursion lines (Reminiscent, Baybarron, Gamma Summon) and GY Fusion reuse keep momentum after disruption. However, the deck's 56-card size and non-Forbidden generic filler (Santa Claws, fill tech) dilute consistency and brick risk; going-second board-break relies on drawing interaction pieces rather than a dedicated combo. Extra Deck is cohesive (11 Invoked Fusios, 3 Links), but no side deck forces maindeck inflexibility. The score reflects system-level consistency, resource regeneration, and interaction layering—not archetype popularity or card-by-card power.

Dimension scores

How the score was computed

Modifiers: none.